Advantages of spoken language interaction in dialogue-based intelligent tutoring systems

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3220, Issue , 2004, Pages 390-400

  Pon Barry, Heather ^a   Clark, Brady ^a   Schultz, Karl ^a   Bratt, Elizabeth Owen ^a   Peters, Stanley ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; INTELLIGENT VEHICLE HIGHWAY SYSTEMS; SCAFFOLDS; SPEECH PROCESSING;

DIALOGUE SYSTEMS; DISFLUENCIES; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; SPEECH INTERFACE; SPOKEN LANGUAGES;

SPEECH RECOGNITION;

EID: 35048812563     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_37     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Belvin, R., Burns, R., & Hein, C. (2001). Development of the HRL Route Navigation Dialogue System. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Human Language Technology Research, Paper H01-1016
2. Bhatt, K. (2004). Classifying student hedges and affect in human tutoring sessions for the CIRCSIM-Tutor intelligent tutoring system. Unpublished M.S. Thesis, Illinois Institute of Technology.
3. Bloom, B.S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective one-on-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13, 4-16.
4. Brennan, S. E., & Williams, M. (1995). The feeling of another's knowing: Prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 383-398.
5. Bulitko, V., & Wilkins., D. C. (1999). Automated instructor assistant for ship damage control. In Proceedings of AAAI-99.
6. Chi, M.T.H., Siler, S., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R.G. (2001). Learning from tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25:471-533.
7. Clark, B., Lemon, O., Gruenstein, A., Bratt, E., Fry, J., Peters, S., Pon-Barry, H., Schultz, K., Thomsen-Gray, Z., & Treeratpituk, P. (In press). A General Purpose Architecture for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In Natural, Intelligent and Effective Interaction in Multimodal Dialogue Systems. Edited by Niels Ole Bernsen, Laila Dybkjaer, and Jan van Kuppevelt. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
8. Clark, H.H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: University Press.
9. Cohen, P.A., Kulik, J.A., & Kulik, C.C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 237-248.
10. Transcripts of face-to-face and keyboard-to-keyboard tutorial dialogues, between physiology professors and first-year students at Rush Medical College (received from M. Evens).
11. Evens, M., & Michael, J. (Unpublished manuscript). One-on-One Tutoring by Humans and Machines. Computer Science Department, Illinois Institute of Technology.
12. Fox, B. (1993). Human Tutorial Dialogue. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Graesscr, A.C., Person, N.K., & Magliano J. P. (1995). Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring sessions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 1-28.
14. Grasso, M.A., & Finin, T.W. (1997). Task Integration in Multimodal Speech Recognition Environments. Crossroads, 3(3), 19-22.
15. Gruenstein, A. (2002). Conversational Interfaces: A Domain-Independent Architecture for Task-Oriented Dialogues. Unpublished M.S. Thesis, Stanford University.
16. Hausmann, R. & Chi, M.T.H. (2002). Can a computer interface support self-explaining? Cognitive Technology, 7(1), 4-15.
17. Hauptmann, A.G. & Rudnicky, A.I. (1988). Talking to Computers: An Empirical Investigation. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 28(6), 583-604
18. Heffernan, N. T. (2001). Intelligent Tutoring Systems have Forgotten the Tutor: Adding a Cognitive Model of Human Tutors. Dissertation. Computer Science Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University. Technical Report CMU-CS-01-127.
19. Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J.R., Hadley, W.H., & Mark, M. A. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30-43.
20. Lemon, O., Gruenstein, A., & Peters, S. (2002). Collaborative activities and multitasking in dialogue systems. In C. Gardent (Ed.), Traitement Automatique des Langues (TAL, special issue on dialogue), 43(2), 131-154.
21. Litman, D., & Forbes, K. (2003). Recognizing Emotions from Student Speech in Tutoring Dialogues. In Proc. of the IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop (ASRU).
22. Person, N.K., Graesser, A.C., Bautista, L., Mathews, E., & the Tutoring Reasearch Group. (2001). Evaluating student learning gains in two versions of AutoTutor. In J. D. Moore, C. L. Redfield, & W. L. Johnson (Eds.) Proceedings of Artificial intelligence in education: AI-ED in the wired and wireless future, 286-293.
23. Person, N.K., & Graesser, A.C. (2003). Fourteen facts about human tutoring: Food for thought for ITS developers. In Proceedings of the AIED 2003 Workshop on Tutorial Dialogue Systems: With a View Towards the Classroom.
24. Rosé, C., Jordan, P., Ringenberg, M., Siler, S., VanLehn, K., & Weinstein, A. (2001). Interactive Conceptual Tutoring in Atlas-Andes. In Proc. of AI in Education 2001.
25. Rosé, C.P., Litman, D., Bhembe, D., Forbes, K., Silliman, S., Srivastava, R., & VanLehn, K. (2003). A Comparison on Tutor and Student Behavior in Speech Versus Text Based Tutoring. In Proc. of the HLT-NAACL 03 Workshop on Educational Applications of NLP.
26. Smith, V. L., & Clark, H. H. (1993). On the course of answering questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 25-38.
27. Xu, W. & Rudnicky, A. (2000). Language modeling for dialog system. In Proceedings of ICSLP 2000. Paper B1-06.