Speech perception as categorization

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 72, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1218-1227

  Holt, Lori L ^a   Lotto, Andrew J ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPREHENSION; HUMAN; INFANT; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LINGUISTICS; NEWBORN; PHONETICS; REVIEW; SEMANTICS; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COMPREHENSION; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 77957684020     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.5.1218     Document Type: Review

References (148)

1. Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Chicago: Aldine.
2. Beale, J.M., & Keil, F.C. (1995). Categorical effects in the perception of faces. Cognition, 57, 217-239.
3. Best, C.T. (1994). The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. In J.C. Goodman & H.C. Nusbaum (Eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp. 167-224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Best, C.T., & Strange, W. (1992). Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 305-330.
5. Bimler, D., & Kirkland, J. (2001). Categorical perception of facial expressions of emotion: Evidence from multidimensional scaling. Cognition & Emotion, 15, 633-658.
6. Blumstein, S.E. (1995). The neurobiology of the sound structure of language. In M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 915-929). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Blumstein, S.E., & Stevens, K.N. (1981). Phonetic features and acoustic invariance in speech. Cognition, 10, 25-32.
8. Borsky, S., Tuller, B., & Shapiro, L.P. (1998). "How to milk a coat": The effects of semantic and acoustic information on phoneme categorization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 2670-2676.
9. Bradlow, A.R., Nygaard, L.C., & Pisoni, D.B. (1999). Effects of talker, rate, and amplitude variation on recognition memory for spoken words. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 206-219.
10. Bradlow, A.R., & Pisoni, D.B. (1999). Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: Talker-, listener- and item-related factors. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2074-2085.
11. Brady, S.A., & Darwin, C.J. (1978). Range effect in the perception of voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63, 1556-1558.
12. Carney, A.E., Widin, G.P., & Viemeister, N.F. (1977). Noncategorical perception of stop consonants differing in VOT. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62, 961-970.
13. Cohen, H., & Lefebvre, C. (2005). Handbook of categorization in cognitive science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
14. Colin, C., & Radeau, M. (2003). Les illusions McGurk dans la parole: 25 ans de recherches [The McGurk illusions in speech: 25 years of research]. L'Année Psychologique, 103, 497-542. [With summary in English] doi:10.3406/psy.2003.29649.
15. Connine, C.M. (1987). Constraints on interactive processes in auditory word recognition: The role of sentence context. Journal of Memory & Language, 16, 527-538. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(87)90138-0.
16. Cooper, F.S., Delattre, P.C., Liberman, A.M., Borst, J.M., & Gerstman, L.J. (1952). Some experiments on the perception of synthetic speech sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24, 597-606.
17. Damper, R.I., & Harnad, S.R. (2000). Neural network models of categorical perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 843-867.
18. Davis, M.H., Johnsrude, I.S., Hervais-Adelman, A., Taylor, K., & McGettigan, C. (2005). Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: Evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 222-241.
19. Diehl, R.L., & Lindblom, B. (2004). Explaining the structure of feature and phoneme inventories. In S. Greenberg, W. Ainsworth, A. Popper, & R. Fay (Eds.), Speech processing in the auditory system (pp. 101-162). New York: Springer.
20. Diehl, R.L., Lotto, A.J., & Holt, L.L. (2004). Speech perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 149-179.
21. Dupoux, E., & Green, K. (1997). Perceptual adjustment to highly compressed speech: Effects of talker and rate changes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 914-927.
22. Fant, G. (1966). A note on vocal tract size factors and non-uniform F-pattern scalings. (Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Project Status Report No. 4, pp. 22-30). Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology.
23. Flege, J.E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233-277). Baltimore: York Press.
24. Flege, J.E., Yeni-Komshian, G.H., & Liu, S. (1999). Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory & Language, 41, 78-104.
25. Francis, A.L., Baldwin, K., & Nusbaum, H.C. (2000). Effects of training on attention to acoustic cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1668-1680.
26. Francis, A.L., & Nusbaum, H.C. (2002). Selective attention and the acquisition of new phonetic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 349-366.
27. Frankish, C. (2008). Precategorical acoustic storage and the perception of speech. Journal of Memory & Language, 58, 815-836.
28. Fu, Q.-J., & Galvin, J.J., III (2003). The effects of short-term training for spectrally mismatched noise-band speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 1065-1072.
29. Galantucci, B., Fowler, C.A., & Turvey, M.T. (2006). The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 361-377.
30. Gay, T. (1978). Effect of speaking rate on vowel formant movements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63, 223-230.
31. Goldinger, S.D. (1996). Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1166-1183.
32. Goldinger, S.D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251-279.
33. Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Barresi, B. (2001). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
34. Goto, H. (1971). Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds "L" and "R." Neuropsychologia, 9, 317-323.
35. Goudbeek, M., Smits, R., Swingley, D., & Cutler, A. (2005). Acquiring auditory and phonetic categories. In H. Cohen & C. Lefebvre (Eds.), Handbook of categorization in cognitive science (pp. 497-514). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
36. Goudbeek, M., Swingley, D., & Smits, R. (2009). Supervised and unsupervised learning of multidimensional acoustic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 1913-1933.
37. Greenspan, S.L., Nusbaum, H.C., & Pisoni, D.B. (1988). Perceptual learning of synthetic speech produced by rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 421-433.
38. Guenther, F.H., Husain, F.T., Cohen, M.A., & Shinn-Cunningham, B.G. (1999). Effects of categorization and discrimination training on auditory perceptual space. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2900-2912.
39. Harnad, S. (1987). Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Harnsberger, J.D. (2001). On the relationship between identification and discrimination of non-native nasal consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 489-503.
41. Hawkins, S. (2003). Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding. Journal of Phonetics, 31, 373-405.
42. Hervais-Adelman, A., Davis, M.H., Johnsrude, I.S., & Carlyon, R.P. (2008). Perceptual learning of noise vocoded words: Effects of feedback and lexicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 34, 460-474.
43. Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007). The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 393-402.
44. Hillenbrand, J., Getty, L.A., Clark, M.J., & Wheeler, K. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3099-3111.
45. Holt, L.L. (2005). Temporally nonadjacent nonlinguistic sounds affect speech categorization. Psychological Science, 16, 305-312.
46. Holt, L.L., & Lotto, A.J. (2006). Cue weighting in auditory categorization: Implications for first and second language acquisition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 3059-3071.
47. Holt, L.L., & Lotto, A.J. (2008). Speech perception within an auditory cognitive science framework. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 42-46.
48. Holt, L.L., Lotto, A.J., & Diehl, R.L. (2004). Auditory discontinuities interact with categorization: Implications for speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 1763-1773.
49. Holt, L.L., Lotto, A.J., & Kluender, K.R. (1998). Incorporating principles of general learning in theories of language acquisition. In M.C. Gruber, D. Higgins, K.S. Olson, & T. Wysocki (Eds.), Chicago Linguistic Society-Vol. 34: The panels (pp. 253-268). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
50. House, A.S., & Fairbanks, G. (1953). The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 105-113.
51. Houtgast, T., & Steeneken, H.J.M. (1973). The modulation transfer function in room acoustics as a predictor of speech intelligibility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54, 557.
52. Ingvalson, E.M. (2008). Predicting F3 usage in /r-l/ perception and production by native Japanese speakers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University.
53. Iverson, P., & Kuhl, P.K. (1995). Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 553-562.
54. Iverson, P., Kuhl, P.K., Akahane-Yamada, R., Diesch, E., Tohkura, Y., Kettermann, A., & Siebert, C. (2003). A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes. Cognition, 87, B47-B57.
55. Jakobson, R.C., Fant, G.M., & Halle, M. (1952). Preliminaries to speech analysis: The distinctive features and their correlates (Tech. Rep. No. 13). Cambridge, MA: MIT, Acoustics Laboratory.
56. Johnson, K. (1997). Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In K. Johnson & J.W. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 145-165). San Diego: Academic Press.
57. Kent, R.D., & Minifie, F.D. (1977). Coarticulation in recent speech production models. Journal of Phonetics, 5, 115-133.
58. Klatt, D.H., & Klatt, L.C. (1990). Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 820-857.
59. Kluender, K.R. (1994). Speech perception as a tractable problem in cognitive science. In M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 173-217). San Diego: Academic Press.
60. Kluender, K.R., Lotto, A.J., & Holt, L.L. (2005). Contributions of nonhuman animal models to understanding human speech perception. In S. Greenberg & W. Ainsworth (Eds.), Listening to speech: An auditory perspective (pp. 203-220). New York: Oxford University Press.
61. Krumhansl, C.L. (1991). Music psychology: Tonal structures in perception and memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 277-303.
62. Kuhl, P.K. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a "perceptual magnet effect" for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 93-107.
63. Kuhl, P.K. (2000). Language, mind, and brain: Experience alters perception. In M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed., pp. 99-115). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64. Kuhl, P.K. (2004). Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 831-843.
65. Kuhl, P.K. (2007). Is speech learning "gated" by the social brain? Developmental Science, 10, 110-120.
66. Kuhl, P.K., Conboy, B.T., Coffey-Corina, S., Padden, D., Rivera-Gaxiola, M., & Nelson, T. (2008). Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: New data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 979-1000.
67. Kuhl, P.K., Williams, K.A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K.N., & Lindblom, B. (1992). Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science, 255, 606-608.
68. Ladefoged, P., & Broadbent, D.E. (1957). Information conveyed by vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 98-104.
69. Ladefoged, P., & Maddieson, I. (1996). The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford: Blackwell.
70. Lenneberg, E.H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.
71. Lewicki, M.S. (2002). Efficient coding of natural sounds. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 356-363.
72. Liberman, A.M. (1957). Some results of research on speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 117-123.
73. Liberman, A.M. (1996). Speech: A special code. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
74. Liberman, A.M., Cooper, F.S., Shankweiler, D.P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431-461.
75. Liberman, A.M., Delattre, P.C., & Cooper, F.S. (1952). The role of selected stimulus-variables in the perception of the unvoiced stop consonants. American Journal of Psychology, 65, 497-516.
76. Liberman, A.M., Harris, K.S., Hoffman, H.S., & Griffith, B.C. (1957). The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 358-368.
77. Lindblom, B. (1986). Phonetic universals in vowel systems. In J.J. Ohala & J.J. Jaeger (Eds.), Experimental phonology (pp. 13-44). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
78. Lippmann, R.P. (1996). Accurate consonant perception without midfrequency speech energy. IEEE Transactions on Speech & Audio Processing, 4, 66.
79. Lisker, L. (1986). "Voicing" in English: A catalogue of acoustic features signaling /b/ versus /p/ in trochees. Language & Speech, 29, 3-11.
80. Lisker, L., & Abramson, A.S. (1964). A cross-linguistic study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384-422.
81. Livingston, K.R., Andrews, J.K., & Harnad, S. (1998). Categorical perception effects induced by category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 732-753.
82. Logan, J.S., Lively, S.E., & Pisoni, D.B. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 874-886.
83. Lotto, A.J., & Holt, L.L. (2000). The illusion of the phoneme. In S.J. Billings, J.P. Boyle, & A.M. Griffith (Eds.), Chicago Linguistic Society-Vol. 35: The panels (pp. 191-204). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
84. Lotto, A.J., & Kluender, K.R. (1998). General contrast effects in speech perception: Effect of preceding liquid on stop consonant identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 602-619.
85. Lotto, A.J., Sato, M., & Diehl, R.L. (2004). Mapping the task for the second language learner: The case of Japanese acquisition of /r/ and /l/. In J. Slifka, S. Manuel, & M. Matthies (Eds.), From sound to sense: 50+ years of discoveries in speech communication [Online conference proceedings]. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
86. Maddox, W.T., Molis, M.R., & Diehl, R.L. (2002). Generalizing a neuropsychological model of visual categorization to auditory categorization of vowels. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 584-597.
87. Magnuson, J.S., McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M.K., & Aslin, R.N. (2003). Lexical effects on compensation for coarticulation: The ghost of Christmash past. Cognitive Science, 27, 285-298.
88. Mann, V.A. (1980). Influence of preceding liquid on stop-consonant perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 407-412.
89. Mann, V.A., & Repp, B.H. (1980). Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [∫]-[s] distinction. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 213-228.
90. Massaro, D.W. (1987). Categorical partition: A fuzzy-logical model of categorization behavior. In S. Harnad (Ed.), Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition (pp. 254-283). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
91. Massaro, D.W. (1998). Perceiving talking faces: From speech perception to a behavioral principle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
92. McCandliss, B.D., Fiez, J.A., Protopapas, A., Conway, M., & Mc-Clelland, J.L. (2002). Success and failure in teaching the [r]-[l] contrast to Japanese adults: Tests of a Hebbian model of plasticity and stabilization in spoken language perception. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 89-108.
93. McClelland, J.L. (2001). Failures to learn and their remediation: A Hebbian account. In J.L. McClelland & R.S. Siegler (Eds.), Mechanisms of cognitive development: Behavioral and neural perspectives (pp. 97-122). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
94. McClelland, J.L., & Elman, J.L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
95. McClelland, J.L., Mirman, D., & Holt, L.L. (2006). Are there interactive processes in speech perception? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 363-369.
96. McMurray, B., Aslin, R.N., Tanenhaus, M.K., Spivey, M.J., & Subik, D. (2008). Gradient sensitivity to within-category variation in words and syllables. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 34, 1609-1631.
97. McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M.K., & Aslin, R.N. (2002). Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access. Cognition, 86, B33-B42.
98. Miceli, G., Gainotti, G., Caltagirone, C., & Masullo, C. (1980). Some aspects of phonological impairment in aphasia. Brain & Language, 11, 159-169.
99. Miller, J.L., & Baer, T. (1983). Some effects of speaking rate on the production of /b/ and /w/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73, 1751-1755.
100. Miller, J.L., & Liberman, A.M. (1979). Some effects of later-occurring information on the perception of stop consonant and semivowel. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 457-465.
101. Mirman, D., Holt, L.L., & McClelland, J.L. (2004). Categorization and discrimination of nonspeech sounds: Differences between steadystate and rapidly-changing acoustic cues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 1198-1207.
102. Mirman, D., McClelland, J.L., Holt, L.L., & Magnuson, J.S. (2008). Effects of attention on the strength of lexical influences on speech perception: Behavioral experiments and computational mechanisms. Cognitive Science, 32, 398-417.
103. Miyawaki, K., Strange, W., Verbrugge, R., Liberman, A.M., Jenkins, J.J., & Fujimura, O. (1975). An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of /r/ and /l/ by native speakers of Japanese and English. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 331-340.
104. Näätänen, R., Lehtokoski, A., Lennes, M., Cheour, M., Huotilainen, M., Iivonen, A., et al. (1997). Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature, 385, 432-434.
105. Näätänen, R., & Winkler, I. (1999). The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 826-859.
106. Nearey, T.M. (1990). The segment as a unit of speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 18, 347-373.
107. Nittrouer, S. (2004). The role of temporal and dynamic signal components in the perception of syllable-final stop voicing by children and adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 1777-1790.
108. Norris, D., McQueen, J.M., & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 299-370.
109. Nygaard, L.C., & Pisoni, D.B. (1998). Talker-specific learning in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 355-376.
110. Oden, G.C., & Massaro, D.W. (1978). Integration of featural information in speech perception. Psychological Review, 85, 172-191.
111. Öhman, S.E.G. (1966). Coarticulation in VCV utterances: Spectrographic measurements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 39, 151-168.
112. Pallier, C., Sebastian-Gallés, N., Dupoux, E., Christophe, A., & Mehler, J. (1998). Perceptual adjustment to time-compressed speech: A cross-linguistic study. Memory & Cognition, 26, 844-851.
113. Palmieri, T.J., & Gauthier, I. (2004). Visual object understanding. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 291-303.
114. Peterson, G.E., & Barney, H.L. (1952). Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24, 175-184.
115. Pisoni, D.B. (1973). Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels. Perception & Psychophysics, 13, 253-260.
116. Pisoni, D.B. (1977). Identification and discrimination of the relative onset time of two component tones: Implications for voicing perception in stops. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 1352-1361.
117. Pitt, M.A., & McQueen, J.M. (1998). Is compensation for coarticulation mediated by the lexicon? Journal of Memory & Language, 39, 347-370.
118. Remez, R.E., Rubin, P.E., Pisoni, D.B., & Carrell, T.D. (1981). Speech perception without traditional speech cues. Science, 212, 947-950.
119. Repp, B.H. (1982). Phonetic trading relations and context effects: New experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 81-110.
120. Repp, B.H., & Liberman, A.M. (1987). Phonetic category boundaries are flexible. In S. Harnad (Ed.), Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition (pp. 89-112). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
121. Rosen, S.M. (1979). Range and frequency effects in consonant categorization. Journal of Phonetics, 7, 393-402.
122. Rosenblum, L.D. (2005). Primacy of multimodal speech perception. In D.B. Pisoni & R.E. Remez (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 51-78). Oxford: Blackwell.
123. Saberi, K., & Perrott, D.R. (1999). Cognitive restoration of reversed speech. Nature, 398, 760.
124. Samuel, A.G. (1977). The effect of discrimination training on speech perception: Noncategorical perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 321-330.
125. Samuel, A.G. (1982). Phonetic prototypes. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 307-314.
126. Samuel, A.G., & Pitt, M.A. (2003). Lexical activation (and other factors) can mediate compensation for coarticulation. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 416-434.
127. Shannon, R.V., Zeng, F.-G., Kamath, V., Wygonski, J., & Ekelid, M. (1995). Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science, 270, 303-304.
128. Sharma, A., & Dorman, M.F. (2000). Neurophysiologic correlates of cross-language phonetic perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2697-2703.
129. Slevc, L.R., & Miyake, A. (2006). Individual differences in secondlanguage proficiency: Does musical ability matter? Psychological Science, 17, 675-681.
130. Smith, E.C., & Lewicki, M.S. (2006). Efficient auditory coding. Nature, 439, 978-982.
131. Spivey, M. (2007). The continuity of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
132. Steinschneider, M., Volkov, I.O., Fishman, Y.I., Oya, H., Arezzo, J.C., & Howard, M.A., III (2005). Intracortical responses in human and monkey primary auditory cortex support a temporal processing mechanism for encoding of the voice onset time phonetic parameter. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 170-186.
133. Stevens, K.N. (2000). Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
134. Stewart, M.E., & Ota, M. (2008). Lexical effects on speech perception in individuals with "autistic" traits. Cognition, 109, 157-162.
135. Studdert-Kennedy, M., Liberman, A.M., Harris, K.S., & Cooper, F.S. (1970). Motor theory of speech perception: A reply to Lane's critical review. Psychological Review, 77, 234-249.
136. Summerfield, Q. (1981). Articulatory rate and perceptual constancy in phonetic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 1074-1095.
137. Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161-204.
138. Volaitis, L.E., & Miller, J.L. (1992). Phonetic prototypes: Influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 723-735.
139. Wade, T., & Holt, L.L. (2005a). Incidental categorization of spectrally complex non-invariant auditory stimuli in a computer game task. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 2618-2633.
140. Wade, T., & Holt, L.L. (2005b). Perceptual effects of preceding nonspeech rate on temporal properties of speech categories. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 939-950.
141. Walley, A.C. (2005). Speech perception in childhood. In D.B. Pisoni & R.E. Remez (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 449-468). Oxford: Blackwell.
142. Werker, J.F. (1994). Cross-language speech perception: Development change does not involve loss. In J.C. Goodman & H.C. Nusbaum (Eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp. 93-120). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
143. Werker, J.F., & Tees, R.C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior & Development, 7, 49-63.
144. Werker, J.F., & Tees, R.C. (1999). Influences on infant speech processing: Toward a new synthesis. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 509-535.
145. Wilson, B., & Dorman, M.F. (2007). The surprising performance of present-day cochlear implants. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 54, 969-972.
146. Winkler, I., Kujala, T., Tiitinen, H., Sivonen, P., Alku, P., Lehtokoski, A., et al. (1999). Brain responses reveal the learning of foreign language phonemes. Psychophysiology, 36, 638-642.
147. Wolfe, J.M., Kluender, K.R., Levi, D.M., Bartoshuk, L.M., Herz, R.S., Klatzky, R.L., et al. (2008). Sensation and perception (2nd ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
148. Zhang, Y., Kuhl, P.K., Imada, T., Kotani, M., & Pruitt, J. (2001). Brain plasticity in behavioral and neuromagnetic measures: A perceptual training study [Abstract]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 2687.