Lexical effects on compensation for coarticulation: The ghost of Christmash past

Cognitive Science

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 285-298

  Magnuson, James S ^a   McMurray, Bob ^b   Tanenhaus, Michael K ^b   Aslin, Richard N ^b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Language understanding; Neural networks; Psychology

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037346973     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0364-0213(03)00004-1     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Cairns, P., Shillcock, R., Chater, N., & Levy, J. P. (1995). Bottom-up connectionist modeling of speech. In J. P. Levy & D. Bairaktaris (Eds.), Connectionist models of memory and language (pp. 289-310). London, England: UCL Press Limited.
2. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (revised edition). New York: Academic Press.
3. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
4. Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1979). Monitoring sentence comprehension. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett (pp. 113-134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Elman, J. L., & McClelland, J. L. (1988). Cognitive penetration of the mechanisms of perception: Compensation for coarticulation of lexically restored phonemes. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 143-165.
6. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Fox, R. A. (1984). Effect of lexical status on phonetic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 526-540.
8. Francis, W. N., & Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
9. Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (1996). Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Ganong,W. F. (1980). Phonetic categorization in auditory perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 110-125.
11. Harris, Z. S. (1955). From phoneme to morpheme. Language, 31, 190-222.
12. Kingsbury, P., Strassel, S., McLemore, C., & McIntyre, R. (1997a). CALLHOME American English transcripts, LDC97T14. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.
13. Kingsbury, P., Strassel, S., McLemore, C., & McIntyre, R. (1997b). CALLHOME American English lexicon (PRONLEX), LDC97L20. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.
14. Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1-36.
15. McClelland, J. L. (1987). The case for interactionism in language processing. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 3-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. McClelland, J. L. (1996). Integration of information: Reflections on the theme of attention and performance XVI. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI. Information integration in perception and communication (pp. 633-656). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Mann, V. A., & Repp, B. H. (1981). Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69, 548-558.
18. McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
19. McQueen, J. M. (1991). The influence of the lexicon on phonetic categorization: Stimulus quality in word-final ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 433-443.
20. Norris, D. (1993). Bottom-up connectionist models of 'interact'. In G. T. M. Altmann & R. Shillcock (Eds.), Cognitive models of speech processing: The second Sperlonga meeting (pp. 211-234). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 299-370.
22. Pitt, M. A. (1995). The locus of the lexical shift in phoneme identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1037-1052.
23. Pitt, M. A., & McQueen, J. M. (1998). Is compensation for coarticulation mediated by the lexicon? Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 347-370.
24. Pitt, M. A., & Samuel, A. G. (1995). Lexical and sublexical feedback in auditory word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 149-188.
25. Repp, B. H. (1981). Perceptual equivalence of two kinds of ambiguous speech stimuli. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 12-14.
26. Repp, B. H., & Mann, V. A. (1981). Perceptual assessment of fricative-stop coarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69, 1154-1163.
27. Repp, B. H., & Mann, V. A. (1982). Fricative-stop coarticulation: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71, 1562-1567.
28. Samuel, A. G. (1981). Phonemic restoration: Insights from a new methodology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 474-494.
29. Samuel, A. G. (1996). Does lexical information influence the perceptual restoration of phonemes? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 28-51.
30. Samuel, A. G. (1997). Lexical activation produces potent phonemic percepts. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 97-127.
31. Samuel, A. G. (2001). Knowing a word affects the fundamental perception of the sounds within it. Psychological Science, 12, 348-351.
32. Samuel, A. G., & Pitt, M. A. (2003). Lexical activation (and other factors) can mediate compensation for coarticulation. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 416-434.
33. Shillcock, R. C., Lindsey, G., Levy, J., & Chater, N. (1992). A phonologically motivated input representation for the modeling of auditory word perception in continuous speech. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 408-413). Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Shipman, D. W., & Zue, V. W. (1982). Properties of large lexicons: Implications for advanced isolated word recognition systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (pp. 546-549). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
35. Svartvik, J., & Quirk, R. (1980). A corpus of English conversation. Lund: Gleerup.
36. Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 374-408.
37. Warren, R. M. (1970). Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds. Science, 167, 392-393.
38. Warren, R. M., & Warren, R. P. (1970). Auditory illusions and confusions. Scientific American, 223, 30-36.