Perceptual effects of preceding nonspeech rate on temporal properties of speech categories

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 67, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 939-950

  Wade, Travis ^a,b   Holt, Lori L ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PositScience   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28844472841     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193621     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. AINSWORTH, W. A. (1974). The influence of precursive sequences on the perception of synthesized vowels. Language & Speech, 17, 103-109.
2. ALLEN, J. S., & MILLER, J. L. (2001). Contextual influences on the internal structure of phonetic categories: A distinction between lexical status and speaking rate. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 798-810.
3. BEDDOR, P. S., HARNSBERGER, J. D., & LINDEMANN, S. (2002). Languagespecific patterns of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: Acoustic structures and their perceptual correlates. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 591-627.
4. BREGMAN, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. DENT, M. L., BRITTAN-POWELL, E. F., DOOLING, R. J., & PIERCE, A. (1997). Perception of synthetic /ba/-/wa/ speech continuum by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 1891-1897.
6. DIEHL, R. L., & WALSH, M. A. (1989). An auditory basis for the stimuluslength effect in the perception of stops and glides. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 2154-2164.
7. EGGERMONT, J. J. (2001). Between sound and perception: Reviewing the search for a neural code. Hearing Research, 157, 1-42.
8. EIMAS, P. D., & MILLER, J. L. (1980). Discrimination of information for manner of articulation by young infants. Infant Behavior & Development, 3, 367-375.
9. FINNEY, D. J. (1971). Probit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. FOWLER, C. A. (1980). Coarticulation and theories of extrinsic timing. Journal of Phonetics, 8, 113-133.
11. FOWLER, C. A. (1990). Sound-producing sources as objects of perception: Rate normalization and nonspeech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 1236-1249.
12. FOWLER. C. A. (1992). Vowel duration and closure duration in voiced and unvoiced stops: There are no contrast effects here. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 143-165.
13. FUJISAKI, H., NAKAMURA, K., & IMOTO, T. (1975). Auditory perception of duration of speech and non-speech stimuli. In G. Fant & M. Tatham (Eds.), Auditory analysis and perception of speech (pp. 197-219). London: Academic Press.
14. GAY, T. (1978). Effect of speaking rate on vowel formant movements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63, 223-230.
15. GOLDSTONE, S., BOARDMAN, W. K., & LHAMON, W. T. (1959). Intersensory comparisons of temporal judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 243-248.
16. GOLDSTONE, S., LHAMON, W. T., & BOARDMAN, W. K. (1957). The time sense: Anchor effects and apparent duration. Journal of Psychology, 44, 145-153.
17. GORDON. P. C. (1988). Induction of rate-dependent processing by coarse-grained aspects of speech. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 137-146.
18. HILLENBRAND. J. M., & GAYVERT, R. T. (2005). Open source software for experiment design and control. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 48, 45-60.
19. HOLT, L. L. (2005). Temporally nonadjacent nonlinguistic sounds affect speech categorization. Psychological Science, 16, 305-312.
20. HOLT, L. L., & KLUENDER, K. R. (2000). General auditory processes contribute to perceptual accommodation of coarticulation. Phonetica, 57, 170-180.
21. KIDD, G. (1989). Articulatory-rate context effects in phoneme identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 736-748.
22. KLATT, D. H. (1980). Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 971-995.
23. KLUENDER, K. R., COADY, J. A., & KIEFTE, M. (2003). Sensitivity to change in perception of speech. Speech Communication, 41, 59-69.
24. LEWICKI, M. S. (2002). Efficient coding of natural sounds. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 356-363.
25. LOTTO, A. J., & KLUENDER, K. R. (1998). General contrast effects in speech perception: Effect of preceding liquid on stop consonant identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 602-619.
26. LOTTO, A. J., KLUENDER, K. R., & HOLT, L. L. (1997). Perceptual compensation for coarticulation by Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 1134-1140.
27. MACK, M., & BLUMSTEIN, S. (1983). Further evidence of acoustic invariance in speech production: The stop-glide contrast. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73, 1739-1750.
28. MILLER, J. L. (1981 ). Effects of speaking rate on segmental distinctions. In P. D. Eimas & J. L. Miller (Eds.), Perspectives on the study of speech (pp. 39-74). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. MILLER, J. L. (1987). Rate-dependent processing in speech perception. In A. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psvchology of language (pp. 119-157). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. MILLER. J. L., & BAER, T. (1983). Some effects of speaking rate on the production of [b] and [w]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73, 1751-1755.
31. MILLER, J. L., GREEN, K. P., & REEVES, A. (1986). Speaking rate and segments: A look at the relation between speech production and speech perception for the voicing contrast. Phonetica, 43, 106-115.
32. MILLER, J. L., & LIBERMAN, A. M. (1979). Some effects of later-occurring information on the perception of stop consonant and semivowel. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 457-465.
33. MILLER, J. L., O'ROURKE, T. B., & VOLAITIS, L. E. (1997). Internal structure of phonetic categories: Effects of speaking rate. Phonetica, 54, 121-137.
34. MILLER. J. L., & VOLAITIS, L. E. (1989a). Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 505-512.
35. MILLER. J. L., & VOLAITIS, L. E. (1989b). Internal structure of phonetic categories: Effects of speaking rate. Phonetica, 54, 121-137.
36. MILLER, J. L., & WAYLAND, S. C. (1993). Limits on the limitations of context-conditioned effects in the perception of [b] and [w]. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 205-210.
37. MOORE, B. C. J., & GLASBERG. B. R. (1983). Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 74, 750-753.
38. NEWMAN, R. S., & SAWUSCH, J. R. (1996). Perceptual normalization for speaking rate: Effects of temporal distance. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 540-560.
39. OLLER, D. K., EILERS, R. E., MISKIEL, E., BURNS, R., & URBANO, R. (1991). The stop/glide boundary shift: Modelling perceptual data. Phonetica, 48, 32-56.
40. PICKETT, J., & DECKER, L. (1960). Time factors in perception of a double consonant. Language & Speech, 32, 693-703.
41. PIND, J. (1995). Speaking rate, voice-onset time, and quantity: The search for higher-order invariants for two Icelandic speech cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 291-304.
42. PISONI, D. B., CARRELL, T. D., & GANS, S. J. (1983). Perception of the duration of rapid spectrum changes in speech and nonspeech signals. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 314-322.
43. PORT, R. (1981). Linguistic timing factors in combination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69, 262-274.
44. PURVES, D., & LOTTO, R. B. (2002). Why we see what we do: An empirical theory of vision. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
45. SCHWAB. E. C., SAWUSCH, J. R., & NUSBAUM, H. C. (1981). The role of second formant transitions in the stop-semivowel distinction. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 121-128.
46. SHINN, P. C., & BLUMSTEIN, S. E. (1984), On the role of the amplitude envelope for the perception of [b] and [w]: Further support for a theory of acoustic invariance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75, 1243-1252.
47. SHINN, P. C., BLUMSTEIN, S. E., & JONGMAN, A. (1985). Limitations of context conditioned effects in the perception of [b] and [w]. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 397-407.
48. SINNOTT, J. M., BROWN, C. H., & BORNEMAN, M. A. (1998). Effects of syllable duration on stop-glide identification in syllable-initial and syllable-final position by humans and monkeys. Perception & Psycho-physics, 60, 1032-1043.
49. SUMMERFIELD, Q. (1975). Aerodynamics versus mechanics in the control of voicing onset in consonant-vowel syllables. In Speech perception (No. 4). Belfast: Queen's University, Department of Psychology.
50. SUMMERFIELD, Q. (1981). Articulatory rate and perceptual constancy in phonetic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 1074-1095.
51. UTMAN, J. (1998). Effects of local speaking rate context on the perception of voice-onset time in initial stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 1640-1653.
52. WALKER, J. T., & IRION, A. L. (1979). Two new contingent aftereffects: Perceived auditory duration contingent on pitch and on temporal order. Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 241-244.
53. WALKER, J. T., IRION, A. L., & GORDON, D. G. (1981). Simple and contingent aftereffects of perceived duration in vision and audition. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 475-486.
54. WAYLAND, S. C., MILLER, J. L., & VOLAITIS, L. E. (1994). The influence of sentential speaking rate and the internal structure of phonetic categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 2694-2701.