Speech perception

Annual Review of Psychology

Volumn 55, Issue , 2004, Pages 149-179

  Diehl, Randy L ^a   Lotto, Andrew J ^b   Holt, Lori L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b BOYS TOWN NATIONAL RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory pattern recognition; Categorical perception; Perceptual learning; Phonetic context effects; Speech production

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; REVIEW; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME;

HUMANS; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 1842433604     PISSN: 00664308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142028     Document Type: Article

References (145)

1. Abramson AS, Lisker L. 1970. Discriminability along the voicing continuum: cross language tests. In Proc. Int. Congr. Phonet. Sci., 6th, Prague, 1967, pp. 569-73. Prague: Academia
2. Aslin RN, Pisoni DB, Hennessy BL, Perey AJ. 1981. Discrimination of voice onset time by human infants: new findings and implications for the effects of early experience. Child Dev. 52:1135-45
3. Atal BS, Hanauer SL. 1971. Speech analysis and synthesis by linear prediction of the speech wave. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 50:637-55
4. Best CT. 1993. Emergence of language-specific constraints in perception of non-native speech: a window on early phono-logical development. In Developmental Neurocognition: Speech and Face Processing in the First Year of Life, ed. B de Boysson-Bardies, S de Schonen, P Jusczyk, P MacNeilage, J Morton, pp. 289-304. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Acad.
5. Best CT. 1995. A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research, ed. W Strange, pp. 171-206. Baltimore, MD: New York Press
6. Best CT, McRoberts GW, Sithole NM. 1988. Examination of perceptual reorganization for normative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 14:345-60
7. Brunswik E. 1956. Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
8. Chomsky N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
9. Delattre PC, Liberman AM, Cooper FS. 1951. Voyelles synthétiques à deux formants et voyelles cardinales. Le Maitre Phon. 96:30-37
10. Delattre PC, Liberman AM, Cooper FS. 1955. Acoustic loci and transitional cues for consonants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 27:769-73
11. Delattre PC, Liberman AM, Cooper FS. 1964. Formant transitions and loci as acoustic correlates of place of articulation in American fricatives. Stud. Linguist. 18:104-21
12. Delattre PC, Liberman AM, Cooper FS, Gerstman LJ. 1952. An experimental study of the acoustic determinants of vowel color. Word 8:195-210
13. de Sa VR, Ballard DH. 1998. Category learning through multimodal sensing. Neurol. Cornput. 10:1097-117
14. Diehl RL. 1987. Auditory constraints on speech perception. In The Psychophysics of Speech Perception, ed. MEH Schouten, 39:210-19. Dordrecht: Martimus-Nihboff
15. Diehl RL. 1991. The role of phonetics within the study of language. Phonetica 48:120-34
16. Diehl, RL, Kluender KR. 1987. On the categorization of speech sounds. In Categorical Perception, ed. S Harnad, pp. 226-53. London: Cambridge Univ. Press
17. Diehl RL, Kluender KR. 1989a. On the objects of speech perception. Ecol. Psychol. 2:121-44
18. Diehl RL, Kluender KR. 1989b. Reply to commentators. Ecol. Psychol. 1:195-225
19. Diehl RL, Lindblom B, Creeger CP. 2003. Increasing realism of auditory representations yields further insights into vowel phonetics. In Proc. Int. Congr. Phon. Sci., 15th, Barcelona. 2:1381-84. Adelaide: Causal Publications
20. Diehl RL, Molis MR. 1995. Effects of fundamental frequency on medial [voice] judgments. Phonetica 52:188-95
21. Diehl RL, Molis MR, Castleman WA. 2001. Adaptive design of sound systems: some auditory considerations. In The Role of Perceptual Phenomena in Phonological Theory, ed. K Johnson, E Hume, pp. 123-39. San Diego: Academic
22. Diehl RL, Souther AF, Convis CL. 1980. Conditions on rate normalization in speech perception. Percept. Psychophys. 27:435-43
23. Diehl RL, Walsh MA. 1989. An auditory basis for the stimulus-length effect in the perception of stops and glides. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85:2154-64
24. Diehl RL, Walsh MA, Kluender KR. 1991. On the interpretability of speech/nonspeech comparisons: a reply to Fowler. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89:2905-9
25. Dooling RJ, Best CT, Brown SD. 1995. Discrimination of synthetic full-formant and sinewave /ra-la/ continua by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97:1839-46
26. Eilers RE. 1977. Context-sensitive perception of naturally produced stop and fricative consonants by infants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61:1321-36
27. Eimas PD. 1974. Auditory and linguistic processing of cues for place of articulation by infants. Percept. Psychophys. 16:513-21
28. Eimas PD. 1991. Comment: some effects of language acquisition on speech perception. In Modularity and the Motor Theory of Speech Perception, ed. IG Mattingly, M Studdert-Kennedy, pp. 111-16. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
29. Eimas PD, Siqueland ER, Jusczyk P, Vigorito J. 1971. Speech perception in infants. Science 171:303-6
30. Elman JL, Diehl RL, Buchwald SE. 1977. Perceptual switching in bilinguals. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 62:971-74
31. Elman JL, McClelland JL. 1988. Cognitive penetration of the mechanisms of perception: compensation for coarticulation of lexically restored phonemes. J. Mem. Lang. 27:143-65
32. Fowler CA. 1980. Coarticulation and theories of extrinsic timing. J. Phon. 8:113-33
33. Fowler CA. 1981. Production and perception of coarticulation among stressed and unstressed vowels. J. Speech Hear. Res. 24:127-39
34. Fowler CA. 1984. Segmentation of coarticulated speech in perception. Percept. Psychophys. 36:359-68
35. Fowler CA. 1986. An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective. J. Phon. 14:3-28
36. Fowler CA. 1989. Real objects of speech perception: a commentary on Diehl and Kluender. Ecol. Psychol. 1:145-60
37. Fowler CA. 1990. Sound-producing sources as objects of perception: rate normalization and nonspeech perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88:1236-49
38. Fowler CA. 1991. Auditory perception is not special: We see the world, we feel the world, we hear the world. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89: 2910-15
39. Fowler CA. 1992. Vowel duration and closure duration in voiced and unvoiced stops: There are no contrast effects here. J. Phon. 20:143-65
40. Fowler CA. 1994. Speech perception: direct realist theory. In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. RE Asher, pp. 4199-203. Oxford: Pergamon
41. Fowler CA. 1996. Listeners do hear sounds, not tongues. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99:1730-41
42. Fowler CA, Best CT, McRoberts GW. 1990. Young infants' perception of liquid coarticulatory influences on following stop consonants. Percept. Psychophys. 48:559-70
43. Fowler CA, Brown JM, Mann VA. 2000. Contrast effects do not underlie effects of preceding liquids on stop-consonant identification by humans. J. Exp. Psychol: Hum. Percept. Perform. 26:877-88
44. Fowler CA, Dekle D. 1991. Listening with eye and hand: crossmodal contributions to speech perception. J. Exp. Psychol: Hum. Percept. Perform. 17:816-28
45. Fowler CA, Rosenblum LD. 1991. The perception of phonetic gestures. In Modularity and the Motor Theory of Speech Perception, ed. IG Mattingly, M Studdert-Kennedy, pp. 33-59. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum
46. Fowler CA, Smith MR. 1986. Speech perception as "vector analysis": an approach to the problems of invariance and segmentation. In Invariance and Variability in Speech Processes, ed. JS Perkell, DH Klatt, pp. 123-39. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
47. Frieda EM, Walley AC, Flege JE, Sloane ME. 1999. Adults' perception of native and nonnative vowels: implications for the perceptual magnet effect. Percept. Psychophys. 61:561-77
48. Gibson JJ. 1966. The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
49. Gibson JJ. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
50. Gordon C, Webb DL, Wolpert S. 1992. One cannot hear the shape of a drum. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 27:134-38
51. Grantham DW. 1995. Spatial hearing and related phenomena. In Hearing, ed. B Moore, pp. 297-345. San Diego, CA: Academic
52. Guenther FH, Husain FT, Cohen MA, ShinnCunningham BG. 1999. Effects of categorization and discrimination training on au ditory perceptual space. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106:2900-12
53. Hammarberg R. 1976. The metaphysics of coarticulation. J. Phon. 4:353-63
54. Hirsh IJ. 1959. Auditory perception of temporal order. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 31:759-67
55. Hirsh IJ, Sherrick CE. 1961. Perceived order in different sense modalities. J. Exp. Psychol. 62:423-32
56. Holt LL. 1999. Auditory constraints on speech perception: an examination of spectral contrast. PhD thesis. Univ. Wis. 132 pp.
57. Holt LL, Lotto AJ, Diehl RL. 2003. Perceptual discontinuities and categorization: Implications for speech perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113:2255
58. Holt LL, Lotto AJ, Kluender KR. 1998. Incorporating principles of general learning in theories of language acquisition. In Chicago Linguistic Society: The Panels, ed. M Gruber, CD Higgins, KS Olson, T Wysocki, 34:253-68. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguist. Soc.
59. Holt LL, Lotto AJ, Kluender KR. 2000. Neighboring spectral content influences vowel identification. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108:710-22
60. Holt LL, Lotto AJ, Kluender KR. 2001. Influence of fundamental frequency on stopconsonant voicing perception: a case of learned covariation or auditory enhancement? J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109:764-74
61. Johnson K, Flemming E, Wright R. 1993. The hyperspace effect: phonetic targets are hyperarticulated. Language 69:505-28
62. Jusczyk PW. 1993. From general to language-specific capacities: the WRAPSA model of how speech perception develops. J. Phon. 21:3-28
63. Jusczyk PW. 1997. The Discovery of Spoken Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
64. Jusczyk PW, Pisoni DB, Walley A, Murray J. 1980. Discrimination of relative onset time of two-component tones by infants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67:262-70
65. Kingston J, Diehl RL. 1994. Phonetic knowledge. Language 70:419-54
66. Kingston J, Diehl RL. 1995. Intermediate properties in the perception of distinctive feature values. In Phonology and Phonetics: Papers in Laboratory Phonology, ed. B Connell, A Arvaniti, 4:7-27. London: Cambridge Univ. Press
67. Kluender KR. 1994. Speech perception as a tractable problem in cognitive science. In Handbook of Psycholinguistics, ed. MA Gernsbacher, pp. 173-217. San Diego, CA: Academic
68. Kluender KR, Diehl RL, Killeen PR. 1987. Japanese quail can learn phonetic categories. Science 237:1195-97
69. Kluender KR, Lotto AJ, Holt LL, Bloedel SL. 1998. Role of experience for language-specific functional mappings of vowel sounds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104:3568-82
70. Krakow RA, Beddor PS, Goldstein LM, Fowler CA. 1988. Coarticulatory influences on the perceived height of nasal vowels. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83:1146-58
71. Kuhl PK. 1981. Discrimination of speech by nonhuman animals: basic auditory sensitivities conducive to the perception of speech-sound categories. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95:340-49
72. Kuhl PK. 1986. Theoretical contributions of tests on animals to the special mechanisms debate in speech. J. Exp. Biol. 45:233-65
73. Kuhl PK. 1991. Human adults and human infants show a "perceptual magnet effect" for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Percept. Psychophys. 50:93-107
74. Kuhl PK. 1992. Speech prototypes: studies on the nature, function, ontogeny and phylogeny of the "centers" of speech categories. In Speech Perception, Production and Linguistic Structure, ed. Y Tohkura, E Vatikiotis-Bateson, Y Sagisaka, pp. 239-64. Tokyo, Jpn: Ohmsha
75. Kuhl PK. 1993. Innate predispositions and the effects of experience in speech perception: the native language magnet theory. In Developmental Neurocognition: Speech and Face Processing in the First Year of Life, ed. B de Boysson-Bardies, S de Schonen, P Jusczyk, P MacNeilage, J Morton, pp. 259-74. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Acad.
76. Kuhl PK. 2000. Language, mind, and the brain: Experience alters perception. In The New Cognitive Neurosciences, ed. MS Gazzaniga, pp. 99-115. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
77. Kuhl PK, Miller JD. 1975. Speech perception by the chinchilla: voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants. Science 190:69-72
78. Kuhl PK, Miller JD. 1978. Speech perception by the chinchilla: identification functions for synthetic VOT stimuli. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63:905-17
79. Kuhl PK, Padden DM. 1982. Enhanced discriminability at the phonetic boundaries for the voicing feature in macaques. Percept. Psychophys. 32:542-50
80. Kuhl PK, Padden DM. 1983. Enhanced discriminability at the phonetic boundaries for the place feature in macaques. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 73:1003-10
81. Ladefoged P, DeClerk J, Lindau M, Papcun G. 1972. An auditory-motor theory of speech production. UCLA Work. Pap. Phon. 22:48-75
82. Lane H. 1965. The motor theory of speech perception: a critical review. Psychol. Rev. 72:275-309
83. Lasky RE, Syrdal-Lasky A, Klein RE. 1975. VOT discrimination by four to six and a half month old infants from Spanish environments. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 20:215-25
84. Liberman AM. 1957. Some results of research on speech perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 29:117-23
85. Liberman AM. 1996. Introduction: some assumptions about speech and how they changed. In Speech: A Special Code. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
86. Liberman AM, Cooper FS, Shankweiler DP, Studdert-Kennedy M. 1967. Perception of the speech code. Psychol. Rev. 74:431-61
87. Liberman AM, Delattre P, Cooper FS. 1952. The role of selected stimulus-variables in the perception of the unvoiced stop consonants. Am. J. Psychol. 65:497-516
88. Liberman AM, Delattre PC, Cooper FS, Gerstman LJ. 1954. The role of consonant-vowel transitions in the stop and nasal consonants. Psychol. Monogr. 68:1-13
89. Liberman AM, Delattre PC, Gerstman LJ, Cooper FS. 1956. Tempo of frequency change as a cue for distinguishing classes of speech sounds. J. Exp. Psychol. 52:127-37
90. Liberman AM, Harris K, Eimas P, Lisker L, Bastian J. 1961a. An effect of learning on speech perception: the discrimination of durations of silence with and without phonemic significance. Lang. Speech 4:175-95
91. Liberman AM, Harris KS, Hoffman HS, Griffith BC. 1957. The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. J. Exp. Psychol. 54:358-68
92. Liberman AM, Harris KS, Kinney JA, Lane H. 1961b. The discrimination of relative onset-time of the components of certain speech and nonspeech patterns. J. Exp. Psychol. 61:379-88
93. Liberman AM, Mattingly IG. 1985. The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 21:1-36
94. Liberman AM, Mattingly IG, Turvey MT. 1972. Language codes and memory codes. In Coding Processes in Human Memory, ed. AW Melton, E Martin, pp. 307-34. Washington, DC: Winston
95. Liljencrants J, Lindblom B. 1972. Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: the role of perceptual contrast. Language 48:839-62
96. Lindau M. 1985. The story of /r/. In Phonetic Linguistics, ed. V Fromkin, pp. 157-68. Orlando, FL: Academic
97. Lindblom BEF, Studdert-Kennedy M. 1967. On the role of formant transitions in vowel recognition. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 42:830-43
98. Lisker L, Abramson AS. 1964. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: acoustical measurements. Word 20:384-422
99. Lisker L, Abramson AS. 1970. The voicing dimension: some experiments in comparative phonetics. In Proc. Int. Congr. Phon. Sci., 6th, Prague, 1967, pp. 563-67. Prague: Academia
100. Lively SE, Pisoni DB. 1997. On prototypes and phonetic categories: a critical assessment of the perceptual magnet effect in speech per ception. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 23:1665-19
101. Lotto AJ. 2000. Language acquisition as complex category formation. Phonetica 57:189-96
102. Lotto AJ, Kluender KR. 1998. General contrast effects of speech perception: effect of preceding liquid on stop consonant identification. Percept. Psychophys. 60:602-19
103. Lotto AJ, Kluender KR, Holt LL. 1997. Perceptual compensation for coarticulation by Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102:1134-40
104. Lotto AJ, Kluender KR, Holt LL. 1998. Theperceptual magnet effect depolarized. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103:3648-55
105. Maddieson I. 1984. Patterns of Sound. London: Cambridge Univ. Press
106. Magnuson JS, McMurray B, Tanenhaus MK, Aslin RN. 2003. Lexical effects on compensation for coarticulation: the ghost of Christmash past. Cogn. Sci. 27:285-98
107. Mann VA. 1980. Influence of preceding liquid on stop-consonant perception. Percept. Psychophys. 28:407-12
108. Mann VA. 1986. Distinguishing universal and language-dependent levels of speech perception: evidence from Japanese listeners' perception of English "1" and "r". Cognition 24:169-96
109. Mann VA, Repp BH. 1981. Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 69:548-58
110. Massaro DW. 1987. Speech Perception by Ear and Eye: A Paradigm for Psychological Inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
111. Massaro DW, Oden GC. 1980. Evaluation and integration of acoustic features in speech perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67:996-1013
112. Mattingly IG, Liberman AM, Syrdal AK, Halwes T. 1971. Discrimination in speech and nonspeech modes. Cogn. Psychol. 2:131-57
113. Maye J, Werker JF, Gerken L. 2002. Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition 82:B101-11
114. McGowan RS. 1994. Recovering articulatory movement from formant frequency trajectories using task dynamics and a genetic algorithm: preliminary results. Speech Commun. 14:19-49
115. McGurk H, MacDonald J. 1976. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 264:746-47
116. Miller JD, Wier CC, Pastore RE, Kelly WJ, Dooling RJ. 1976. Discrimination and labeling of noise-buzz sequences with varying noise-lead times: an example of categorical perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 60:410-17
117. Miller JL. 1987. Rate-dependent processing in speech perception. In Progress in the Psychology of Language, ed. Ellis, pp. 119-57. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
118. Miller JL, Eimas PD. 1983. Studies on the categorization of speech by infants. Cognition 12:135-65
119. Miller JL, Liberman AM. 1979. Some effects of later-occurring information on the perception of stop consonant and semivowel. Percept. Psychophys. 25:457-65
120. Nearey TM. 1980. On the physical interpretation of vowel quality: cinefluorographic and acoustic evidence. J. Phon. 8:213-41
121. Nearey TM. 1989. Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85:2088-113
122. Nearey TM. 1990. The segment as a unit of speech perception. J. Phon. 18:347-73
123. Nearey TM, Hogan J. 1986. Phonological contrast in experimental phonetics: relating distributions of production data to perceptual categorization curves. In Experimental Phonology, ed. JJ Ohala, J Jaeger, pp. 141-61. New York: Academic
124. Ohala JJ. 1985. Around flat. In Phonetic Linguistics: Essays in Honor of Peter Ladefoged, ed. VA Fromkin, pp. 223-41. Orlando, FL: Academic
125. Ohala JJ. 1996. Speech perception is hearing sounds, not tongues. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99: 1718-25
126. Pastore RE. 1981. Possible psychoacoustic factors in speech perception. In Perspectives on the Study of Speech, ed. PD Eimas, JL Miller, pp. 165-205. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
127. Pegg JE, Werker JF. 1997. Adult and infant per ception of two English phones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102:3742-53
128. Pisoni DB. 1977. Identification and discrimination of the relative onset time of two component tones: implications for voicing perception in stops. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61:1352-61
129. Repp BH. 1981. On levels of description in speech research. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 69: 1462-64
130. Riordan CJ. 1977. Control of vocal-tract length in speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 62:998-1002
131. Rosch EH. 1978. Principles of categorization. In Cognition and Categorization, ed. E Rosch, B Lloyd, pp. 28-48. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
132. Samuel AG, Pitt MA. 2003. Lexical activation (and other factors) can mediate compensation for coarticulation. J. Mem. Long. 48: 416-34
133. Simos PG, Diehl RL, Breier JI, Molis MR, Zouridakis G, Papanicolaou AC. 1998. MEG correlates of categorical perception of a voice onset time continuum in humans. Cogn. Brain Res. 7:215-19
134. Sinex DG, McDonald LP, Mott JB. 1991. Neural correlates of nonmonotonic temporal acuity for voice onset time. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90:2441-49
135. Sparks DW, Kuhl P, Edmonds AE, Gray GP. 1978. Investigating the MESA (Multipoint Electrotactile Speech Aid): the transmission of segmental features of speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63:246-57
136. Stephens JD, Holt LL. 2002. Are context effects in speech perception modulated by visual information? 43rd Annu. Meet. Psychon. Soc., Kansas City, MO.
137. Stevens KN, Klatt DH. 1974. Role of formant transitions in the voiced-voiceless distinction for stops. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 55:653-59
138. Summerfield Q. 1981. On articulatory rate and perceptual constancy in phonetic perception. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 7:1074-95
139. Sussman HM, Fruchter D, Hilbert J, Sirosh J. 1998. Linear correlates in the speech signal: the orderly output constraint. Behav. Brain Sci. 21:241-99
140. Sussman JE, Lauckner -Morano VJ. 1995. Further tests of the "perceptual magnet effect" in the perception of [i]: identification and change-no-change discrimination. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97:539-52
141. Ullman S. 1984. Maximizing rigidity: the incremental recovery of 3-D structure from rigid and nonrigid motion. Perception 13:255-74
142. Werker JF, Gilbert JHV, Humphrey K, Tees RC. 1981. Developmental aspects of cross-language speech perception. Child Dev. 52:349-53
143. Werker JF, Tees RC. 1984. Cross-language speech perception: evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behav. Dev. 7:49-63
144. Werner LA, Bargones JY. 1992. Psychoacoustic development of human infants. In Advances in Infancy Research, ed. C Rovee-Collier, L Lipsitt, 7:103-45. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
145. Williams L. 1977. The perception of stop consonant voicing by Spanish-English bilinguals. Percept. Psychophys. 21:289-97