Laterally attached kinetochores recruit the checkpoint protein Bub1, but satisfy the spindle checkpoint

Cell Cycle

Volumn 9, Issue 17, 2010, Pages 3619-3628

  Shimogawa, Michelle M ^a,b   Wargacki, Megan M ^a   Muller, Eric G ^a   Davis, Trisha N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Biorientation; DAM1 765; Kinetochore microtubule attachments; Spindle assembly checkpoint

Indexed keywords

CELL PROTEIN; COHESIN; MICROTUBULE ASSOCIATED PROTEIN; NOCODAZOLE; PROTEIN BIK1; PROTEIN BUB1; PROTEIN CIN8; PROTEIN KIP3; PROTEIN STU2; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE ARREST; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS SPINDLE; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY;

EID: 77956400468     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.9.17.12907     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Campbell MS, Chan GK, Yen TJ. Mitotic checkpoint proteins HsMAD1 and HsMAD2 are associated with nuclear pore complexes in interphase. J Cell Sci 2001; 114:953-63.
2. Iouk T, Kerscher O, Scott RJ, Basrai MA, Wozniak RW. The yeast nuclear pore complex functionally interacts with components of the spindle assembly checkpoint. J Cell Biol 2002; 159:807-19. (Pubitemid 36008363)
3. Scott RJ, Cairo LV, Van de Vosse DW, Wozniak RW. The nuclear export factor Xpo1p targets Mad1p to kinetochores in yeast. J Cell Biol 2009; 184:21-9.
4. Howell BJ, McEwen BF, Canman JC, Hoffman DB, Farrar EM, Rieder CL, et al. Cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin drives kinetochore protein transport to the spindle poles and has a role in mitotic spindle checkpoint inactivation. J Cell Biol 2001; 155:1159-72.
5. Waters JC, Chen RH, Murray AW, Salmon ED. Localization of Mad2 to kinetochores depends on microtubule attachment, not tension. J Cell Biol 1998; 141:1181-91.
6. Gillett ES, Espelin CW, Sorger PK. Spindle checkpoint proteins and chromosome-microtubule attachment in budding yeast. J Cell Biol 2004; 164:535-46.
7. Biggins S, Murray AW. The budding yeast protein kinase Ipl1/Aurora allows the absence of tension to activate the spindle checkpoint. Genes Dev 2001; 15:3118-29. (Pubitemid 33115676)
8. Stern BM, Murray AW. Lack of tension at kinetochores activates the spindle checkpoint in budding yeast. Curr Biol 2001; 11:1462-7.
9. Sandall S, Severin F, McLeod IX, Yates JR, 3rd, Oegema K, Hyman A, et al. A Bir1-Sli15 complex connects centromeres to microtubules and is required to sense kinetochore tension. Cell 2006; 127:1179-91. (Pubitemid 44894521)
10. Nakajima Y, Tyers RG, Wong CC, Yates JR, 3rd, Drubin DG, Barnes G. Nbl1p: a Borealin/Dasra/CSC-1-like protein essential for Aurora/Ipl1 complex function and integrity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 2009; 20:1772-84.
11. Jeyaprakash AA, Klein UR, Lindner D, Ebert J, Nigg EA, Conti E. Structure of a Survivin-Borealin-INCENP core complex reveals how chromosomal passengers travel together. Cell 2007; 131:271-85. (Pubitemid 47576137)
12. Kang J, Cheeseman IM, Kallstrom G, Velmurugan S, Barnes G, Chan CS. Functional cooperation of Dam1, Ipl1 and the inner centromere protein (INCENP)-related protein Sli15 during chromosome segregation. J Cell Biol 2001; 155:763-74. (Pubitemid 34286229)
13. Shimogawa MM, Widlund PO, Riffle M, Ess M, Davis TN. Bir1 is required for the tension checkpoint. Mol Biol Cell 2009; 20:915-23.
14. Kim JH, Kang JS, Chan CS. Sli15 associates with the ipl1 protein kinase to promote proper chromosome segregation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 1999; 145:1381-94.
15. Dewar H, Tanaka K, Nasmyth K, Tanaka TU. Tension between two kinetochores suffices for their bi-orientation on the mitotic spindle. Nature 2004; 428:93-7. (Pubitemid 38332364)
16. Lampson MA, Renduchitala K, Khodjakov A, Kapoor TM. Correcting improper chromosome-spindle attachments during cell division. Nat Cell Biol 2004; 6:232-7. (Pubitemid 38344361)
17. Tanaka TU, Rachidi N, Janke C, Pereira G, Galova M, Schiebel E, et al. Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Aurora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome biorientation by altering kinetochore-spindle pole connections. Cell 2002; 108:317-29. (Pubitemid 34178397)
18. Skoufias DA, Andreassen PR, Lacroix FB, Wilson L, Margolis RL. Mammalian mad2 and bub1/bubR1 recognize distinct spindle-attachment and kinetochore-tension checkpoints. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98:4492-7. (Pubitemid 32295004)
19. Taylor SS, Hussein D, Wang Y, Elderkin S, Morrow CJ. Kinetochore localisation and phosphorylation of the mitotic checkpoint components Bub1 and BubR1 are differentially regulated by spindle events in human cells. J Cell Sci 2001; 114:4385-95. (Pubitemid 34082859)
20. Taylor SS, McKeon F. Kinetochore localization of murine Bub1 is required for normal mitotic timing and checkpoint response to spindle damage. Cell 1997; 89:727-35. (Pubitemid 27516175)
21. Taylor SS, Ha E, McKeon F. The human homologue of Bub3 is required for kinetochore localization of Bub1 and a Mad3/Bub1-related protein kinase. J Cell Biol 1998; 142:1-11. (Pubitemid 28341135)
22. Basu J, Bousbaa H, Logarinho E, Li Z, Williams BC, Lopes C, et al. Mutations in the essential spindle checkpoint gene bub1 cause chromosome missegregation and fail to block apoptosis in Drosophila. J Cell Biol 1999; 146:13-28. (Pubitemid 29349961)
23. Jablonski SA, Chan GK, Cooke CA, Earnshaw WC, Yen TJ. The hBUB1 and hBUBR1 kinases sequentially assemble onto kinetochores during prophase with hBUBR1 concentrating at the kinetochore plates in mitosis. Chromosoma 1998; 107:386-96.
24. Meraldi P, Sorger PK. A dual role for Bub1 in the spindle checkpoint and chromosome congression. EMBO J 2005; 24:1621-33. (Pubitemid 40646451)
25. Logarinho E, Resende T, Torres C, Bousbaa H. The human spindle assembly checkpoint protein Bub3 is required for the establishment of efficient kinetochore- microtubule attachments. Mol Biol Cell 2008; 19:1798-813. (Pubitemid 351805130)
26. Tanaka K, Mukae N, Dewar H, van Breugel M, James EK, Prescott AR, et al. Molecular mechanisms of kinetochore capture by spindle microtubules. Nature 2005; 434:987-94.
27. Shimogawa MM, Graczyk B, Gardner MK, Francis SE, White EA, Ess M, et al. Mps1 phosphorylation of Dam1 couples kinetochores to microtubule plus ends at metaphase. Curr Biol 2006; 16:1489-501. (Pubitemid 44142997)
28. O'Toole ET, Winey M, McIntosh JR. High-voltage electron tomography of spindle pole bodies and early mitotic spindles in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 1999; 10:2017-31.
29. Pearson CG, Yeh E, Gardner M, Odde D, Salmon ED, Bloom K. Stable kinetochore-microtubule attachment constrains centromere positioning in metaphase. Curr Biol 2004; 14:1962-7. (Pubitemid 39464822)
30. Gardner MK, Bouck DC, Paliulis LV, Meehl JB, O'Toole ET, Haase J, et al. Chromosome congression by Kinesin-5 motor-mediated disassembly of longer kinetochore microtubules. Cell 2008; 135:894-906.
31. van Breugel M, Drechsel D, Hyman A. Stu2p, the budding yeast member of the conserved Dis1/XMAP215 family of microtubule-associated proteins is a plus end-binding microtubule destabilizer. J Cell Biol 2003; 161:359-69. (Pubitemid 36529853)
32. Wolyniak MJ, Blake-Hodek K, Kosco K, Hwang E, You L, Huffaker TC. The regulation of microtubule dynamics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by three interacting plus-end tracking proteins. Mol Biol Cell 2006; 17:2789-98.
33. Kosco KA, Pearson CG, Maddox PS, Wang PJ, Adams IR, Salmon ED, et al. Control of microtubule dynamics by Stu2p is essential for spindle orientation and metaphase chromosome alignment in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 2001; 12:2870-80.
34. Pearson CG, Maddox PS, Zarzar TR, Salmon ED, Bloom K. Yeast kinetochores do not stabilize Stu2p-dependent spindle microtubule dynamics. Mol Biol Cell 2003; 14:4181-95. (Pubitemid 37186319)
35. Gupta ML Jr, Carvalho P, Roof DM, Pellman D. Plus end-specific depolymerase activity of Kip3, a kinesin-8 protein, explains its role in positioning the yeast mitotic spindle. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8:913-23. (Pubitemid 44314722)
36. Wargacki M, Tay J, Muller E, Asbury C, Davis T. Kip3, the yeast kinesin-8, is required for clustering of kinetochores at metaphase. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:2581-8.
37. Blake-Hodek KA, Cassimeris L, Huffaker TC. Regulation of microtubule dynamics by Bim1 and Bik1, the budding yeast members of the EB1 and CLIP-170 families of plus-end tracking proteins. Mol Biol Cell 21:2013-23.
38. Lin H, de Carvalho P, Kho D, Tai CY, Pierre P, Fink GR, et al. Polyploids require Bik1 for kinetochore-microtubule attachment. J Cell Biol 2001; 155:1173-84. (Pubitemid 34286268)
39. Tytell JD, Sorger PK. Analysis of kinesin motor function at budding yeast kinetochores. J Cell Biol 2006; 172:861-74.
40. Ma L, McQueen J, Cuschieri L, Vogel J, Measday V. Spc24 and Stu2 promote spindle integrity when DNA replication is stalled. Mol Biol Cell 2007; 18:2805-16.
41. Biggins S, Severin FF, Bhalla N, Sassoon I, Hyman AA, Murray AW. The conserved protein kinase Ipl1 regulates microtubule binding to kinetochores in budding yeast. Genes Dev 1999; 13:532-44. (Pubitemid 29131878)
42. Franck AD, Powers AF, Gestaut DR, Gonen T, Davis TN, Asbury CL. Tension applied through the Dam1 complex promotes microtubule elongation providing a direct mechanism for length control in mitosis. Nat Cell Biol 2007; 9:832-7. (Pubitemid 47019470)
43. DeLuca JG, Gall WE, Ciferri C, Cimini D, Musacchio A, Salmon ED. Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and attachment stability are regulated by Hec1. Cell 2006; 127:969-82.
44. Yang Z, Kenny AE, Brito DA, Rieder CL. Cells satisfy the mitotic checkpoint in Taxol, and do so faster in concentrations that stabilize syntelic attachments. J Cell Biol 2009; 186:675-84.
45. Wach A, Brachat A, Alberti-Segui C, Rebischung C, Philippsen P. Heterologous HIS3 marker and GFP reporter modules for PCR-targeting in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 1997; 13:1065-75.
46. Muller EG, Snydsman BE, Novik I, Hailey DW, Gestaut DR, Niemann CA, et al. The organization of the core proteins of the yeast spindle pole body. Mol Biol Cell 2005; 16:3341-52. (Pubitemid 40962603)
47. Kollman JM, Zelter A, Muller EG, Fox B, Rice LM, Davis TN, et al. The structure of the gamma-tubulin small complex: implications of its architecture and flexibility for microtubule nucleation. Mol Biol Cell 2008; 19:207-15. (Pubitemid 351186146)
48. Sherman F, Fink GR, Hicks JB. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory: Laboratory Course Manual for Methods in Yeast Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 1986.
49. Widlund PO, Lyssand JS, Anderson S, Niessen S, Yates JR, 3rd, Davis TN. Phosphorylation of the chromosomal passenger protein Bir1 is required for localization of Ndc10 to the spindle during anaphase and full spindle elongation. Mol Biol Cell 2006; 17:1065-74. (Pubitemid 43376530)
50. Lea DE, Coulson CA. The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations. J Genet 1949; 49:264-84.
51. Nguyen T, Vinh DB, Crawford DK, Davis TN. A genetic analysis of interactions with Spc110p reveals distinct functions of Spc97p and Spc98p, components of the yeast gamma-tubulin complex. Mol Biol Cell 1998; 9:2201-16. (Pubitemid 28373634)