Prediction of Protein-Protein Interface Sequence Diversity Using Flexible Backbone Computational Protein Design

Structure

Volumn 16, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1777-1788

  Humphris, Elisabeth L ^a,b   Kortemme, Tanja ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

PROTEINS

Indexed keywords

GROWTH HORMONE; GROWTH HORMONE RECEPTOR;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; HORMONE STRUCTURE; PHAGE DISPLAY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; HUMAN GROWTH HORMONE; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; RECEPTORS, SOMATOTROPIN; SERINE;

EID: 57049180165     PISSN: 09692126     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2008.09.012     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aharoni A., Gaidukov L., Khersonsky O., McQ Gould S., Roodveldt C., and Tawfik D.S. The 'evolvability' of promiscuous protein functions. Nat. Genet. 37 (2005) 73-76
2. Butterfoss G.L., and Kuhlman B. Computer-based design of novel protein structures. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 35 (2006) 49-65
3. Cunningham B.C., and Wells J.A. Rational design of receptor-specific variants of human growth hormone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88 (1991) 3407-3411
4. Dahiyat B.I., and Mayo S.L. De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection. Science 278 (1997) 82-87
5. Davis I.W., Arendall III W.B., Richardson D.C., and Richardson J.S. The backrub motion: how protein backbone shrugs when a sidechain dances. Structure 14 (2006) 265-274
6. Ding F., and Dokholyan N.V. Emergence of protein fold families through rational design. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2 (2006) e85
7. Dokholyan N.V., and Shakhnovich E.I. Understanding hierarchical protein evolution from first principles. J. Mol. Biol. 312 (2001) 289-307
8. Dunbrack Jr. R.L. Rotamer libraries in the 21st century. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12 (2002) 431-440
9. Friedland G.D., Linares A.J., Smith C.A., and Kortemme T. A simple model of backbone flexibility improves modeling of side-chain conformational variability. J. Mol. Biol. 380 (2008) 757-774
10. Fu X., Apgar J.R., and Keating A.E. Modeling backbone flexibility to achieve sequence diversity: the design of novel α-helical ligands for Bcl-xL. J. Mol. Biol. 371 (2007) 1099-1117
11. Harbury P.B., Plecs J.J., Tidor B., Alber T., and Kim P.S. High-resolution protein design with backbone freedom. Science 282 (1998) 1462-1467
12. Havranek J.J., and Harbury P.B. Automated design of specificity in molecular recognition. Nat. Struct. Biol. 10 (2003) 45-52
13. Hayes R.J., Bentzien J., Ary M.L., Hwang M.Y., Jacinto J.M., Vielmetter J., Kundu A., and Dahiyat B.I. Combining computational and experimental screening for rapid optimization of protein properties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 (2002) 15926-15931
14. Humphris E.L., and Kortemme T. Design of multi-specificity in protein interfaces. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3 (2007) e164
15. Jaramillo A., Wernisch L., Hery S., and Wodak S.J. Folding free energy function selects native-like protein sequences in the core but not on the surface. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 (2002) 13554-13559
16. Koehl P., and Levitt M. De novo protein design. II. Plasticity in sequence space. J. Mol. Biol. 293 (1999) 1183-1193
17. Koehl P., and Levitt M. Protein topology and stability define the space of allowed sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 (2002) 1280-1285
18. Kortemme T., and Baker D. A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein-protein complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 (2002) 14116-14121
19. Kortemme T., and Baker D. Computational design of protein-protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 8 (2004) 91-97
20. Kortemme T., Morozov A.V., and Baker D. An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 326 (2003) 1239-1259
21. Kortemme T., Joachimiak L.A., Bullock A.N., Schuler A.D., Stoddard B.L., and Baker D. Computational redesign of protein-protein interaction specificity. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11 (2004) 371-379
22. Kuhlman B., and Baker D. Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97 (2000) 10383-10388
23. Larson S.M., England J.L., Desjarlais J.R., and Pande V.S. Thoroughly sampling sequence space: large-scale protein design of structural ensembles. Protein Sci. 11 (2002) 2804-2813
24. Lazaridis T., and Karplus M. Effective energy function for proteins in solution. Proteins 35 (1999) 133-152
25. Pal G., Ultsch M.H., Clark K.P., Currell B., Kossiakoff A.A., and Sidhu S.S. Intramolecular cooperativity in a protein binding site assessed by combinatorial shotgun scanning mutagenesis. J. Mol. Biol. 347 (2005) 489-494
26. Pal G., Kouadio J.L., Artis D.R., Kossiakoff A.A., and Sidhu S.S. Comprehensive and quantitative mapping of energy landscapes for protein-protein interactions by rapid combinatorial scanning. J. Biol. Chem. 281 (2006) 22378-22385
27. Pokala N., and Handel T.M. Review: protein design-where we were, where we are, where we're going. J. Struct. Biol. 134 (2001) 269-281
28. Ponder J.W., and Richards F.M. Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. J. Mol. Biol. 193 (1987) 775-791
29. Saunders C.T., and Baker D. Recapitulation of protein family divergence using flexible backbone protein design. J. Mol. Biol. 346 (2005) 631-644
30. Schiffer C., Ultsch M., Walsh S., Somers W., de Vos A.M., and Kossiakoff A. Structure of a phage display-derived variant of human growth hormone complexed to two copies of the extracellular domain of its receptor: evidence for strong structural coupling between receptor binding sites. J. Mol. Biol. 316 (2002) 277-289
31. Sidhu S.S., Lowman H.B., Cunningham B.C., and Wells J.A. Phage display for selection of novel binding peptides. Methods Enzymol. 328 (2000) 333-363
32. Smith C.A., and Kortemme T. Backrub-like backbone simulation recapitulates natural protein conformational variability and improves mutant side-chain prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 380 (2008) 742-756
33. Taverna D.M., and Goldstein R.A. Why are proteins so robust to site mutations?. J. Mol. Biol. 315 (2002) 479-484
34. Treynor T.P., Vizcarra C.L., Nedelcu D., and Mayo S.L. Computationally designed libraries of fluorescent proteins evaluated by preservation and diversity of function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104 (2007) 48-53
35. Wagner A. Robustness, evolvability, and neutrality. FEBS Lett. 579 (2005) 1772-1778
36. Wollacott A.M., and Desjarlais J.R. Virtual interaction profiles of proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 313 (2001) 317-342
37. Xia Y., and Levitt M. Simulating protein evolution in sequence and structure space. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 14 (2004) 202-207