Inversion of the amplitude of the two-dimensional analytic signal of the magnetic anomaly by the particle swarm optimization technique

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 182, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 652-662

  Srivastava, Shalivahan ^a   Agarwal, B N P ^a  

^a INDIAN SCHOOL OF MINES   (India)

Author keywords

Geopotential theory; Inverse theory

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC SIGNALS; DRILL HOLE; EARTH'S MAGNETIC FIELD; EULER DECONVOLUTION; FIRST-ORDER; GEOPOTENTIALS; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES; INVERSE THEORY; MAGNETIC ANOMALIES; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUE; RANDOM NOISE; REMNANT MAGNETIZATION; SEARCH PARAMETERS; SEARCH SPACES; SECOND ORDER DERIVATIVES; SOURCE GEOMETRY; STRUCTURAL INDICES; WAVE NUMBERS;

FINANCIAL DATA PROCESSING; GEOMETRY; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; INDEXING (MATERIALS WORKING); MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIZATION; OPTICAL COMMUNICATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION (PSO);

DATA INTERPRETATION; DATA INVERSION; GEOMAGNETIC FIELD; GEOMETRY; GEOPOTENTIAL; INVERSE ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC ANOMALY; MAGNETIZATION; OPTIMIZATION; SIGNAL PROCESSING; THEORETICAL STUDY; TWO-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

EID: 77955124014     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04631.x     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Agarwal BNP. Quantitative interpretation of self-potential anomalies. 1984, 154-157. in, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, pp
2. Agarwal BNP, Shaw RK. Comment on " An analytic signal approach to the interpretation of total magnetic anomalies" by Shuang Qin. Geophys. Prospect. 1996, 44:911-914.
3. Agarwal BNP, Shaw RK. Applications of total gradients to interpret gravity/magnetic anomalies over 3D sources. 2005, Madrid, Spain, 2005 June 13-16 as paper H004
4. Agarwal BNP, Srivastava S. FORTRAN codes to implement enhanced local wave number technique to determine location, depth and shape of the causative source using magnetic anomaly. Comput. Geosci. 2008, 34:1843-1849. 10.1016/j.cageo.2007.10.012, doi
5. Agarwal BNP, Srivastava S. Analyses of self-potential anomalies by conventional and extended Euler deconvolution techniques. Comput. Geosci. 2009, 35:2231-2238. 10.1016/j.cageo.2009.03.005, doi
6. Ballantyne EJ. Magnetic curve fit for a thin dike-Calculator program (TI-59). Geophysics 1980, 45:447-455.
7. Bastani M, Pedersen LB. Automatic interpretation of magnetic dyke parameters using the analytic signal technique. Geophysics 2001, 66:551-561.
8. Bhattacharyya BK. A generalized multibody model for inversion of magnetic anomalies. Geophysics 1980, 45:255-270.
9. Bhattacharyya BK, Chan KC. Reduction of magnetic and gravity data on an arbitrary surface acquired in a region of high topographic relief. Geophysics 1977, 42:1411-1430.
10. Bott MHP. The use of rapid digital computing methods for direct gravity interpretation of sedimentary basins. Geophysi. J. R. astr. Soc. 1960, 3:63-67.
11. Carlisle A, Dozier G. An off-the-shelf PSO. 2001, 1-6. in, Indianapolis, IN, pp
12. Chen J, Chouteau M, Keating P. Joint inversion of magnetic anomaly due to kimberlite pipe and its analytic signal. 2009, 222-226. in, Swazialand, pp
13. Clerc M. The swarm and the queen: towards a deterministic and adaptive particle swarm optimization. 1999, 1951-1957. in, Washington, DC, pp
14. Cordell L, McCafferty AE. A terracing operator for physical propertymapping with potential field data. Geophysics 1989, 54:621-634.
15. Donelli M, Franceschini G, Martini A, Mass A. An integrated multiscaling strategy based on a particle swarm algorithm for inverse scattering problems. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2006, 44:298-312.
16. Fedi M, Primiceri R, Quarta T, Villani AV. Joint application of continuous and discrete wavelet transform on gravity data to identify shallow and deep sources. Geophys. J. Int. 2004, 56:7-21. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02118.x, doi
17. Grant FS. Themagnetic susceptibility mapping method for interpreting aeromagnetic surveys. 1973, 1201. in, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, p
18. Grant FS, West GF. Interpretation theory. Applied Geophysics 1965, in, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York
19. Haney M, Johnston C, Li Y, Nabighian M. Envelopes of 2D and 3D magnetic data and their relationship to the analytic signal: preliminary results. 2003, 592-595. in, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, pp
20. Hornby P, Boschetti F, Horowitz FG. Analysis of potential field data in the wavelet domain. Geophys. J. Int. 1999, 137:175-196.
21. Hsu S-K, Sibuet J-C, Shyu C-T. High resolution detection of geologic boundaries from potential-field anomalies: an enhanced analytic signal technique. Geophysics 1996, 61:373-386.
22. Huang L, Guan Z. Discussion on " Magnetic interpretation using the 3-D analytic signal" by Walter R. Roest, Jacob Verhoef, and Mark Pilkington" Geophysics 1998, 63:667-670.
23. Inman SR. Resistivity inversion with ridge regression. Geophysics 1975, 40:798-817.
24. Juang CF. A hybrid genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization for recurrent network design. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., Part B 2004, 34:997-1006.
25. Keating P, Pilkington M. Euler deconvolution of the analytic signal and its application to magnetic interpretation. Geophys. Prospect. 2004, 52:165-182.
26. Keating P, Sailhac P. Use of the analytic signal to identify magnetic anomalies due to kimberlite pipes. Geophysics 2004, 69:180-190. 10.1190/1.1649386, doi
27. Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. 1995, 1942-1948. in, Piscataway, NJ, pp
28. Ku CC, Sharp JA. Werner method for automated magnetic interpretation and its refinement using Marquardt inverse modeling. Geophysics 1983, 48:754-774.
29. Li X. On the use of different methods for estimating magnetic depth. Leading Edge 2003, 22:1090-1099.
30. Li Y, Oldenburg DW. 3-D inversion of magnetic data. Geophysics 1996, 61:394-408.
31. Lyrio JCS, Tenorio L, Li Y. Efficient automatic denoising of gravity gradiometry data. Geophysics 2004, 69:772-782.
32. Macdonald KC, Miller SP, Huestis SP, Spiess FN. Three-dimensional modeling of a magnetic reversal boundary from inversion of deep-tow measurements. J. geophys. Res. 1980, 85:3670-3680.
33. Mikhailov V, Pajot G, Diament M, Price A. Tensor deconvolution: a method to locate equivalent sources from full tensor gravity data. Geophysics 2007, 72:I61-I69.
34. Misener DJ, Grant FS, Walker P. Variable depth, space-domain magnetic susceptibility mapping. 1984, 237. in, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, p
35. More JJ. The Levenburg-Marquardt algorithm: implementation and theory. Numerical Analysis, Dundee, 1977 Lecture Notes in Mathematics: 630 1978, 105-116. Watson GA. in, pp, ed, Springer, Berlin
36. Moreau F, Gibert D, Holschneider M, Saracco G. Wavelet analysis of potential fields. Inverse Probl. 1997, 13:165-178.
37. Nabighian MN. The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section: its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation. Geophysics 1972, 37:507-517.
38. Nabighian MN. Additional comments on the analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section. Geophysics 1974, 39:85-92.
39. Nabighian MN, Grauch VJS, Hansen RO, LaFehr TR, Li Y, Peirce JW, Phillips JD, Ruder ME. The historical development of the magnetic method in exploration. Geophysics 2005, 70:33ND-61ND. FIGS.10.1190/1.2133784, 6
40. Naudy H. Automatic determination of depth on aeromagnetic profiles. Geophysics 1971, 36:717-722.
41. O'Brien DP. CompuDepth, a new method for depth-to-basement computation. 1972, SEG
42. Ontario airborne geophysical surveys, magnetic and electromagnetic data, Matheson area. 2000, 1101. Ontario Geological Survey, Geophysical Data Set
43. Pajot G, de Viron O, Diament M, Lequentrec-Lalancette M-F, Mikhailov V. Noise reduction through joint processing of gravity and gravity gradient data. Geophysics 2008, 73:I23-I34.
44. Parker RL, Huestis SP. Inversion of magnetic anomalies in the presence of topography. J. geophys. Res. 1974, 79:1587-1593.
45. Pedersen LB. Interpretation of potential field data: a generalized inverse approach. Geophys. Prospect. 1977, 25:199-230.
46. Pedersen LB. Constrained inversion of potential field data. Geophys. Prospect. 1979, 27:726-748.
47. Pilkington M. 3-D magnetic imaging using conjugate gradients. Geophysics 1997, 62:1132-1142.
48. Pilkington M, Crossley DJ. Determination of crustal interface topography from potential fields. Geophysics 1986, 51:1277-1284.
49. Pilkington M, Keating P. The relationship between local wavenumber and analytic signal in magnetic interpretation. Geophysics 2006, 71:L1-L3. 10.11901/1.2163911, doi
50. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN 1994, 2nd edn, Cambridge University Press, New Delhi
51. Pustisek AM. Noniterative three-dimensional inversion of magnetic data. Geophysics 1990, 55:782-785.
52. Reddy MJ, Kumar DN. Multi objective particle swarm optimization for optimal reservoir operation. 2005, 1183-1192. in, Pune, pp
53. Ridsdill-Smith TA, Dentith MC. The wavelet transform in aeromagnetic processing. Geophysics 1999, 64:1003-1013.
54. Robinson J, Rahamat-Samii Y. Particle swarm optimization in electromagnetics. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2004, 52:397-407.
55. Roy A. Ambiguity in geophysical interpretation. Geophysics 1962, 27. 10.1190/1.1438985, doi
56. Roy L. Source geometry identification by simultaneous use of structural index and shape factor. Geophys. Prospect. 2001, 49:159-164.
57. Salem A. Interpretation of magnetic data using analytic signal derivatives. Geophys. Prospect. 2005, 53:75-82.
58. Salem A, Ravat D. A combined analytic signal and Euler method (AN-EUL) for automatic interpretation of magnetic data. Geophysics 2003, 68:1952-1961.
59. Salem A, Ravat D, Mushayandebvu M, Ushijima K. Estimation of depth and shape factor from potential field data over sources of simple geometry. 2002, in, Salt Late City, Utah, Expanded Abstract
60. Salem A, Ravat D, Mushayandebvu MF, Ushijima K. Linearized least-squares method for interpretation of potential field data from sources of simple geometry. Geophysics 2004, 69:783-788.
61. Salem A, Ravat D, Smith RS, Ushijima K. Interpretation of magnetic data using an enhanced local wave number (ELW) method. Geophysics 2005, 70:L7-L12.
62. Sanyi Yuan, Shangxu Wang, Nan Tian. Swarm intelligence optimization and its application in geophysical data inversion. J. appl. Geophys. 2009, 6:166-174.
63. Sen MK, Stoffa PL. Global Optimization Methods in Geophysical Inversion 1995, 1-281. pp, Elsevier, Amsterdam
64. Shaw RK, Agarwal BNP. A generalized concept of resultant gradient to interpret potential field maps. Geophys. Prospect. 1997, 45:1003-1011.
65. Shaw RK, Srivastava S. Particle swarm optimization: a new tool to invert geophysical data. Geophysics 2007, 72:F75-F83.
66. Shaw RK, Agarwal BNP, Nandi BK. Use of Walsh transforms in estimation of depths of idealized sources from total-field magnetic anomaly. Comput. Geosci. 2007, 33:966-975.
67. Shearer S, Li Y. 3D inversion of magnetic total gradient data in the presence of remanent magnetization. 2004, 774-777. in, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, pp
68. Silva JBC, Hohmann GW. Nonlinear magnetic inversion using a random search method. Geophysics 1983, 48:1645-1658.
69. Silva JBC, Hohmann GW. Airborne magnetic susceptibility mapping. Explor. Geophys. 1984, 15:1-13.
70. Skeels DC. Ambiguity in gravity interpretation. Geophysics 1947, 12:43-56.
71. Smith RS, Salem A. Imaging the depth, structure and susceptibility from magnetic data: the advanced source parameter imaging method. Geophysics 2005, 70:L31-L38.
72. Smith RS, Thurston JB, Dai T-F, Macleod IN. iSPI™: the improved source parameter imaging method. Geophys. Prospect. 1998, 46:141-151.
73. Spector A, Grant F. Statistical models for interpreting aeromagnetic data. Geophysics 1970, 35:293-302.
74. Srivastava S, Agarwal BNP. Interpretation of self-potential anomalies by enhanced local wave number technique. J. appl. Geophys. 2009, 68:259-268.
75. Syberg FJR. A Fourier method for the regional-residual problem of potential fields. Geophys. Prospect. 1972, 20:47-75.
76. Telford WM, Geldart LP, Sheriff RE, Keys DA. Applied Geophysics 1976, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
77. Thompson DT. EULDPH: a new technique for making computer assisted depth estimates from magnetic data. Geophysics 1982, 47:31-37.
78. Thurston JB, Smith RS. Automatic conversion of magnetic data to depth, dip, and susceptibility contrast using the SPI™ method. Geophysics 1997, 62:807-813.
79. Thurston JB, Smith RS, Guillon J-C. A multimodel method for depth estimation from magnetic data. Geophysics 2002, 67:555-561.
80. Vallee MA, Keating P, Smith RS, St-Hilaire C. Estimating depth and model type using the continuous wavelet transform of the magnetic data. Geophysics 2004, 69:191-199.
81. Wang X, Hansen RO. Inversion for magnetic anomalies of arbitrary three-dimensional bodies. Geophysics 1990, 55:1321-1326.
82. Weimerskirch H, Martin J, Clerquin Y, Alexandre P, Jiraskova S. Energy savings in flight formation. Nature 2001, 413:697-698.
83. Werner S. Interpretation of magnetic anomalies of sheet-like bodies. Sveriges Geologiska Undersokning, Series C, Arsbok 1955, 43(No. 6). p. 49.
84. While J, Jackson A, Smit D, Biegert E. Spectral analysis of gravity gradiometry profiles. Geophysics 2006, 71:11-22.
85. Whitehill DE. Automated interpretation of magnetic anomalies using the vertical prism model. Geophysics 1973, 38:1070-1087.
86. Wilken Dennis, Wolz Susanne, Muller Christf, Rabbel Wolfgand. FINOSEIS: a new approach to offshore- building foundation soil analysis using high resolution reflection seismic data and Scholte-wave dispersion analysis. J. appl. Geophys. 2009, 68:117-123.