iSPI™ - The improved source parameter imaging method

Geophysical Prospecting

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 141-151

  Smith, Richard S ^a   Thurston, Jeffrey B ^a   Dai, Ting Fan ^b   MacLeod, Ian N ^b  

^a CGG   (France)

^b Geosoft Inc   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA PROCESSING; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

ANOMALOUS MAGNETIC RESPONSE;

MAGNETIC PROSPECTING;

IMAGING METHOD; MAGNETIC ANOMALY; SOURCE PARAMETER;

EID: 0031597224     PISSN: 00168025     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2478.1998.00084.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Atchuta Rao D., Ram Babu H.V. and Sanker Narayan P.V. 1981. Interpretation of magnetic anomalies due to dikes: The complex gradient method. Geophysics 46, 1572-1578.
2. Hartman R.R., Teskey D.J. and Friedberg J.L. 1971. A system for rapid digital aeromagnetic interpretation. Geophysics 36, 891-918.
3. Hsu S.-K., Sibuet J.-C. and Shyu C.-T. 1996. High-resolution detection of geologic boundaries from potential-field anomalies: An enhanced analytic signal technique. Geophysics 61, 373-386.
4. Jain S. 1976. An automatic method of direct interpretation of magnetic profiles. Geophysics 41, 531-541.
5. MacLeod I.N., Jones K. and Dai T.-F. 1993. 3-D analytic signal in the interpretation of total magnetic field data at low magnetic latitudes. Exploration Geophysics 24, 679-688.
6. Murthy K.S.R. and Mishra D.C. 1980. Fourier transform of the general expression for the magnetic anomaly due to a long horizontal cylinder. Geophysics 45, 1091-1093.
7. Nabighian M.N. 1972. The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section: its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation. Geophysics 37, 507-517.
8. Naudy H. 1971. Automatic determination of depth on aeromagnetic profiles. Geophysics 363 712-722.
9. Neil C. 1990. A computer program to interpret automatically potential field data using Euler's equation of inhomogeneity. MSc thesis, University of Leeds.
10. Neil C., Whaler K.A. and Reid A.B. 1991. Extensions to Euler's method for three-dimensional potential field interpretation. 53rd EAEG meeting, Florence, Italy, Expanded Abstracts, 416-417.
11. Reford M.S. 1964. Magnetic anomalies over thin sheets. Geophysics 29, 532-536.
12. Reid A.B. 1995. Euler deconvolution: Past, present, and future - A review. 65th SEG meeting, Houston, Expanded Abstracts, 272-273.
13. Reid A.B., Allsop J.M., Granser H., Millet A.J. and Somerton I.W. 1990. Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution. Geophysics 55, 80-91.
14. Roest W.R., Verhoef J. and Pilkington M. 1992. Magnetic interpretation using the 3-D analytic signal. Geophysics 57, 116-125.
15. Thompson D.T. 1982. EULDPH: A new technique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data. Geophysics 47, 31-37.
16. Thurston J.B. and Brown R.J. 1994. Automated source edge location with a new variable pass-band horizontal-gradient operator. Geophysics 59, 546-554.
17. Thurston J.B. and Smith R.S. 1997. Automatic conversion of magnetic data to depth, dip, and susceptibility contrast using the SPI™ method. Geophysics 62, 807-813.