Interpretation of magnetic data using an enhanced local wavenumber (ELW) method

Geophysics

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2005, Pages

  Salem, Ahmed ^a   Ravat, Dhananjay ^b   Smith, Richard ^c   Ushijima, Keisuke ^d  

^a NUCLEAR MATERIALS AUTHORITY   (Egypt)

^b SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Fugro Airborne Surveys Canada   (Canada)

^d KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NOISE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GEOPHYSICS; LINEAR EQUATIONS; MAGNETIC DEVICES;

LOCAL-WAVENUMBER METHOD; MAGNETIC DATA INTERPRETATION; PRIORI INFORMATION; RANDOM NOISES;

DATA HANDLING;

DATA PROCESSING; MAGNETIC METHOD;

EID: 17944371349     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.1884828     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Blakely, R. J., 1995, Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications: Cambridge University Press.
2. Blakely, R. J., and R. W. Simpson, 1986, Approximating edges of source bodies from magnetic or gravity anomalies: Geophysics, 51, 1494-1498.
3. Bracewell, R., 1965, The Fourier transform and its applications: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
4. Meju, M. A., 1994, A general program for linear parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis: Computers & Geosciences, 20, 197-220.
5. Nabighian, M. N., 1972, The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section: Its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation: Geophysics, 37, 507-517.
6. Nabighian, M. N., and M. Asten, 2002, Metalliferous mining geophysics: State of the art in the last decade of the 20th century and the beginning of the new millennium: Geophysics, 67, 964-978.
7. Ontario Geological Survey, 2000, Ontario airborne geophysical surveys, magnetic and electromagnetic data, Matheson area: Geophysical Data Set 1101.
8. Reid, A. B., J. M. Allsop, H. Granser, A. J. Millet, and I. W. Somerton, 1990, Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution: Geophysics, 55, 80-91.
9. Salem, A., and D. Ravat, 2003, A combined analytic signal and Euler method (AN-EUL) for automatic interpretation of magnetic data: Geophysics, 68, 1952-1961.
10. Salem, A., and R. S. Smith, 2005, Depth and structural index from the normalized local wavenumber of 2D magnetic anomalies: Geophysical Prospecting, 51, 83-89.
11. Salem, A., A. Elsirafi, and K. Ushijima, 1999, Design and application of high-resolution aeromagnetic survey over Gebel Duwi area and its offshore extension, Egypt: Memoirs of the Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu University, 59, no. 3, 201-213.
12. Salem, A., K. Ushijima, A. Elsirafi, and H. Mizunaga, 2000, Spectral analysis of aeromagnetic data for geothermal reconnaissance of Quseir area, northern Red Sea, Egypt: Proceedings of World Geothermal Congress 2000, 1669-1673.
13. Smith, R. S., J. B. Thurston, T. Dai, and I. N. MacLeod, 1998, iSPI-The improved source parameter imaging method: Geophysical Prospecting, 46 141-151.
14. Thompson, D. T., 1982, EULDPH, A new technique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data: Geophysics, 47 31-37.
15. Thurston, J. B., and R. S. Smith, 1997, Automatic conversion of magnetic data to depth, dip, and susceptibility contrast using the SPI method: Geophysics, 62, 807-813.
16. Thurston, J. B., R. S. Smith, and J. Guillon, 2002, A multimodel method for depth estimation from magnetic data: Geophysics, 67, 555-561.
17. Vallee, M. A., P. Keating, R. S. Smith, and C. St.-Hilaire, 2004, Estimating depth and model type using the continuous wavelet transform of magnetic data: Geophysics, 69, 191-199.