Imaging depth, structure, and susceptibility from magnetic data: The advanced source-parameter imaging method

Geophysics

Volumn 70, Issue 4, 2005, Pages

  Smith, Richard S ^a   Salem, Ahmed ^b  

^a Fugro Airborne Surveys Canada   (Canada)

^b NUCLEAR MATERIALS AUTHORITY   (Egypt)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

HILBERT TRANSFORM; LOCAL WAVENUMBERS; PARAMETER IMAGING METHOD; STRUCTURAL INDEX;

GEOMAGNETISM;

DATA INTERPRETATION; MAGNETIC SURVEY; SOURCE PARAMETERS;

EID: 27344435430     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.1990219     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bracewell, R., 1965, The Fourier transform and its applications: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
2. Fedi, M., and G. Florio, 2001, Detection of potential fields source boundaries by enhanced horizontal derivative method: Geophysical Prospecting, 49, 40-58.
3. Hsu, S.-K., J.-C. Sibuet, and C.-T. Shyu, 1996, High resolution detection of geologic boundaries from potential field anomalies: An enhanced analytic signal technique: Geophysics, 61, 373-386.
4. Hsu, S.-K., D. Coppens, and C.-T. Shyu, 1998, Depth to magnetic source using the generalized analytic signal: Geophysics, 63, 1947-1957.
5. Jensen, L. S., C. L. Baker, and N. F. Trowell, 1985, Preliminary results of bedrock samples from sonic drilling program in the Matheson area, Cochrane District, Map P. 2848, scale 1:100 000: Ontario Geological Survey.
6. Li, Y., and D. W. Oldenburg, 1996, 3-D inversion of magnetic data: Geophysics, 61, 394-408.
7. Nabighian, M. N., 1972, The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section: Its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation: Geophysics, 37, 507-517.
8. Ontario Geological Survey, 2002, Ontario airborne geophysical surveys, magnetic and electromagnetic data, profile data, Geosoft format, Timmins area MEGATEM: Ontario Geological Survey Geophysical Data Set 1041d.
9. Pilkington, M., and D. J. Crossley, 1987, A Kalman filter approach to susceptibility mapping: Geophysics, 52, 655-664.
10. Reeves, C. V., S. W. Reford, and P. R. Milligan, 1997, Airborne geophysics: Old methods, new images, in A. G. Gubbins, ed., Proceedings of Exploration 97: Fourth Decennial International Conference on Mineral Exploration, 13-30.
11. Reid, A. B., 2003, Euler magnetic structural index of a thin-bed fault: Geophysics, 68, 1255-1256.
12. Salem, A., and D. Ravat, 2003, A combined analytic signal and Euler method (AN-EUL) for automatic interpretation of magnetic data: Geophysics, 68, 1952-1961.
13. Salem, A., D. Ravat, R. Smith, and K. Ushijima, 2005, Interpretation of magnetic data using an enhanced local wavenumber (ELW) method: Geophysics, 70, L7-L12.
14. Silva, J. B. C., and G. W. Hohmann, 1984, Airborne magnetic susceptibility mapping: Exploration Geophysics, 15, 1-13.
15. Smith. R. S., J. B. Thurston, T.-F. Dai, and I. N. MacLeod, 1998. ISPI - The improved source parameter imaging method: Geophysical Prospecting, 46, 141-151.
16. Thurston, J. B., and R. S. Smith, 1997, Automatic conversion of magnetic data to depth, dip, susceptibility contrast using the SPI method: Geophysics, 62, 807-813.
17. Thurston, J. B., R. S. Smith, and J. Guillon, 2002, A multimodel method for depth estimation from magnetic data: Geophysics, 67, 555-561.
18. Urquhart, W. E. S., and D. W. Strangway, 1985, Interpretation of part of an aeromagnetic survey in the Matagami area of Quebec, in W. J. Hinze, ed., The utility of regional gravity and magnetic anomaly maps: SEG, 426-438.