Tensor deconvolution: A method to locate equivalent sources from full tensor gravity data

Geophysics

Volumn 72, Issue 5, 2007, Pages

  Mikhailov, Valentin ^a,b   Pajot, Gwendoline ^b   Diament, Michel ^b   Price, Antony ^c  

^a INSTITUT DE PHYSIQUE DU GLOBE DE PARIS   (France)

^b SCHMIDT INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS OF THE EARTH   (Russian Federation)

^c TOTAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NOISE; DECONVOLUTION; EULER EQUATIONS; GRADIENT METHODS; GRAVITATION; TENSORS;

GRADIENT TENSOR; GRADIOMETRY; GRAVITY FIELDS; TENSOR DECONVOLUTION;

MAGNETOMETERS;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATA INTERPRETATION; DECONVOLUTION; ESTIMATION METHOD; EULERIAN ANALYSIS; GRAVITY FIELD;

EID: 34548531507     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.2749317     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Barbosa, V. C. F., J. B. C. Silva, and W. E. Medeiros, 1999, Stability analysis and improvement of structural index estimation in Euler deconvolution: Geophysics, 64, 48-60. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/ 1.1444529
2. Bell, R. E., R. Anderson, and L. Pratson, 1997, Gravity gradiometry resurfaces: The Leading Edge, 16, 55-59. lee LEEDFF 1070-485X 10.1190/ 1.1437431
3. Bell, R. E., and R. O. Hansen, 1998, The rise and fall of early oil field technology: The torsion balance gradiometer: The Leading Edge, 17, 81-83. lee LEEDFF 1070-485X 10.1190/1.1437836
4. Blakely, R. J., 1995, Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications: Cambridge University Press.
5. Condi, F., and M. Talwani, 1999, Resolution and efficient inversion of gravi-ty gradiometry: 69th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 358-361.
6. ESA, 1999, ESA gravity field and steady-state ocean circulation explorer, Reports for mission selection, the four candidate earth explorer core missions: SP-1233.
7. Fairhead, J. D., K. J. Bennett, D. R. H. Gordon, and D. Huang, 1994, Euler: Beyond the 'black box': 64th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 422-424.
8. Fitzgerald, D., A. Reid, and P. McInerney, 2004, New discrimination techniques for Euler deconvolution: Computers and Geosciences, 30, 461-469. cgo CGEODT 0098-3004 10.1016/j.cageo.2004.03.006
9. Gordin, V. M., B. O. Mikhailov, and V. O. Mikhailov, 1980, Physical aspects of anomalous fields approximation and filtration: Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, 16, 52-61. pss PSOSED 1063-7834
10. Jekeli, C., 1993, A review of gravity gradiometer survey system data analysis: Geophysics, 58, 508-514. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1443433
11. Jorgensen, G. J., and J. L. Kisabeth, 2000, Joint 3-D inversion of gravity, magnetic and tensor gravity fields for imaging salt formations in the deep water Gulf of Mexico: 70th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 424-426.
12. Keating, P., and M. Pilkington, 2004, Euler deconvolution of the analytic signal and its application to magnetic interpretation: Geophysical Prospecting, 52, 165-182. 8uc GPPRAR 0016-8025 10.1111/ j.1365-2478.2004.00408.x
13. Li, X., 2003, On the use of different methods for estimating magnetic depth: The Leading Edge, 22, 1090-1099. lee LEEDFF 1070-485X 10.1190/ 1.1634912
14. Li, Y., 2001a, Processing gravity gradiometer data using an equivalent source technique: 71st Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1466-1469.
15. 2001b, 3-D inversion of gravity gradiometer data: 71st Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1470-1473.
16. Lyrio, J., L. Tenorio, and Y. Li, 2004, Efficient automatic denoising of gravity gradiometry data: Geophysics, 69, 772-782. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1759463
17. Martelet, G., P. Sailhac, F. Moreau, and M. Diament, 2001, Characterization of geological boundaries using 1D-wavelet transform on gravity data: Geophysics, 66, 1116. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/ 1.1487060
18. Mikhailov, V. O., A. Galdeano, M. Diament, A. Gvishiani, S. Agayan, S. Bogoutdinov, E. Graeva, and P. Sailhac, 2003, Application of artificial intelligence for Euler solution clustering: Geophysics, 68, 168-180. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1543204
19. Mushayandebvu, M. F., P. van Driel, A. B. Reid, and J. D. Fairhead, 1999, Magnetic imaging using extended Euler deconvolution: 69th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 401-402.
20. Nabighian, M. N., and R. O. Hansen, 2001, Unification of Euler and Werner deconvolution in three dimensions via the generalized Hilbert transform: Geophysics, 66, 1805-1810. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/ 1.1487122
21. O'Brien, J., A. Rodriguez, D. Sixta, M. A. Davies, and P. Houghton, 2005, Resolving the K-2 salt structure in the Gulf of Mexico: An integrated approach using prestack depth imaging and full tensor gravity gradiometry, The Leading Edge, 24, 404-409. lee LEEDFF 1070-485X 10.1190/ 1.1901394
22. Pawlowski, B., 1998, Gravity gradiometry in resource exploration: The Leading Edge, 17, 51-52. lee LEEDFF 1070-485X 10.1190/1.1437820
23. Pedersen, L. M., and T. M. Rasmussen, 1990, The gradient tensor of potential anomalies: Some implications on data collection and data processing of maps: Geophysics, 55, 1558-1566. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1442807
24. Press, W. H., S. A. Teukolsky, B. P. Flannery, and W. T. Vetterling, 1992, Numerical recipes in Fortran: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed.: Cambridge University Press.
25. Reid, A. B., J. M. Allsop, H. Grancer, A. J. Millett, and I. W. Somerton, 1990, Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution: Geophysics, 55, 80-91. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/ 1.1442774
26. Roest, W. R., J. Verhoev, and M. Pilkington, 1992, Magnetic interpretation using the 3D analytic signal: Geophysics, 57, 116-125. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1443174
27. Routh, P., G. J. Jorgensen, and J. L. Kisabeth, 2001, Base of the salt mapping using gravity and tensor gravity data: 70th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1482-1484.
28. Slack, H. A., V. M. Lynch, and L. Langan, 1967, The geomagnetic gradiometer: Geophysics, 32, 877-892. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/ 1.1439897
29. Stavrev, P. Y., 1997, Euler deconvolution using differential similarity transformations of gravity or magnetic anomalies: Geophysical Prospecting, 45, 207-246. 8uc GPPRAR 0016-8025 10.1046/ j.1365-2478.1997.00331.x
30. Steenland, N. C., H. A. Slack, V. M. Lynch, and L. Langan, authors: 1968, Discussion on: 'The geomagnetic gradiometer,' Geophysics, 33, 681-683. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1486915
31. Szabó, Z., 1998, Three fundamental papers of Loránd Eötvös: Eötvös Loránd Geophysical Institute of Hungary.
32. Telford, W. M., L. P. Geldart, and R. E. Sheriff, 1990, Applied Geophysics: Cambridge University Press.
33. Thompson, D. T., 1982, EULDPH: A new technique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data: Geophysics, 47, 31-37. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1441278
34. While, J., A. Jackson, D. Smit, and E. Biegert, 2006, Spectral analysis of gravity gradiometry profiles: Geophysics, 71, no. 1, J11-J22. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.2169848
35. Zhang, C., M. F. Mushayandebvu, A. B. Reid, J. D. Fairhead, and M. Odegard, 2000, Euler deconvolution of gravity tensor gradient data: Geophysics, 65, 512-520. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1444745
36. Zhdanov, M. S., R. Ellis, and S. Mukherjee, 2004, Three-dimensional regularized focusing inversion of gravity gradient tensor component data: Geophysics, 69, 925-937. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1778236