Euler deconvolution of the analytic signal and its application to magnetic interpretation

Geophysical Prospecting

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 165-182

  Keating, P ^a   Pilkington, M ^a  

^a GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONVOLUTION; DATA REDUCTION; GRANITE; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; PROBLEM SOLVING; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

EULER DECONVOLUTION; MAGNETIC INTERPRETATION;

GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING;

DATA INTERPRETATION; DECONVOLUTION; EULERIAN ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC SURVEY;

EID: 2442597161     PISSN: 00168025     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00408.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ayer J.A., Trowell N.F., Berger B., Madon Z., Zalnieriunas R. and Valade L. 1999. Geological compilation of the Lake Abitibi area, Abitibi Greenstone Belt. Ontario Geological Survey Miscellaneous Release - Data 46.
2. Barbosa V.C.F., Silva J.B.C. and Medeiros W.E. 1999. Stability analysis and improvement of structural index estimation in Euler deconvolution. Geophysics 64, 48-60.
3. Hsu S.-K., Coppens D. and Shyu C.-T. 1998. Depth to magnetic source using the generalized analytic signal. Geophysics 63, 1947-1957.
4. Huang D., Gubbins D., Clark R.A. and Whaler K.A. 1995. Combined study of Euler's homogeneity equation for gravity and magnetic field. 57th EAGE conference, Glasgow, UK, Extended Abstracts, P144.
5. Jensen L.S., Baker C.L. and Trowell N.F. 1985. Preliminary results of bedrock samples from sonic drilling program in the Matheson area, Cochrane District, Map P. 2848, scale 1:100000. Ontario Geological Survey.
6. MacLeod I.C., Jones K. and Fan Dai T. 1993. 3-D analytic signal in the interpretation of total magnetic field data at low magnetic latitudes. Exploration Geophysics 24, 679-688.
7. Marson I. and Klingele E. 1993. Advantages of using the vertical gradient of gravity for 3-D interpretation. Geophysics 58, 1588-1595.
8. Nabighian M.N. 1972. The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section: its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation. Geophysics 37, 507-517.
9. Ontario Geological Survey 1999. The Ontario Drill Hole Database. ERLIS data set 13. Ontario Geological Survey.
10. Ontario Geological Survey 2000. Ontario Airborne Geophysical Surveys, Magnetic and Electromagnetic Data, Matheson Area. Geophysical data set 1101. Ontario Geological Survey.
11. Palacky G.J., Mwenifumbo C.J. and Stephens L.E. 1992. Geophysical studies at the Val Gagné test site, Ontario. In: Current Research, Part E, Paper 92-1E, pp. 185-193. Geological Survey of Canada.
12. Pullan S.E., Hunter J.A., Gagné R.M. and Good R.L. 1987. Delineation of bedrock topography at Val Gagné, Ontario, using seismic reflection techniques. In: Current Research, Part A, Paper 87-1A, pp. 905-912. Geological Survey of Canada.
13. Ravat D. 1996. Analysis of the Euler method and its applicability in environmental investigations. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 1, 229-238.
14. Reid A.B. 1995. Euler deconvolution: Past, present and future - A review. 65th SEG meeting, Houston, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 272-273.
15. Reid A.B., Alsop J.M., Grander H., Millet A.J. and Somerton I.W. 1990. Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution. Geophysics 55, 80-91.
16. Roest W, Verhoef J. and Pilkington M. 1992. Magnetic interpretation using the 3-D analytic signal. Geophysics 57, 116-125.
17. ™ - the improved source parameter imaging method. Geophysical Prospecting 46, 141-151.
18. Thompson D.T. 1982. EULDPH - A technique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data. Geophysics 47, 31-37.
19. Thurston J.B. and Smith R.S. 1997. Automatic conversion of magnetic data to depth, dip, and susceptibility contrast using the SPI(TM) method. Geophysics 62, 807-813.