Analyses of self-potential anomalies by conventional and extended Euler deconvolution techniques

Computers and Geosciences

Volumn 35, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 2231-2238

  Agarwal, B N P ^a   Srivastava, Shalivahan ^a  

^a INDIAN SCHOOL OF MINES   (India)

Author keywords

FORTRAN codes; Inclined sheet; Polarized cylinder; Structural index; Two dimensional sources

Indexed keywords

FORTRAN CODES; INCLINED SHEET; POLARIZED CYLINDER; STRUCTURAL INDEX; TWO-DIMENSIONAL SOURCES;

CYLINDERS (SHAPES); EULER EQUATIONS; FINANCIAL DATA PROCESSING; FORTRAN (PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE); INDEXING (MATERIALS WORKING); PARAMETER ESTIMATION; POLES; TWO DIMENSIONAL;

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY;

DECONVOLUTION; EULERIAN ANALYSIS; GEOMETRY; HOMOGENEITY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INDEX METHOD; MULTIOBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING; OXIDATION; POLARIZATION; REDUCTION; SELF POTENTIAL; VISUALIZATION;

EID: 70349966231     PISSN: 00983004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2009.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Agarwal, B.N.P., 1984. Quantitative interpretation of self-potential anomalies. In: Expanded Abstract Volume of the 54th SEG Annual Meeting and Exposition. Atlanta, pp. 154-157.
2. Agarwal B.N.P., and Lal T. Calculation of the vertical gradient of the gravity field using the Fourier transform. Geophysical Prospecting 20 (1972) 448-458
3. Agarwal B.N.P., and Lal T. A generalized method of computing second derivative of gravity field. Geophysical Prospecting 20 (1972) 385-394
4. Agarwal B.N.P., and Srivastava S. Fortran codes to implement enhanced local wave number technique to determine location, depth and shape of the causative source using magnetic anomaly. Computers & Geosciences 34 (2008) 1843-1849 10.1016/j.cageo.2007.10.012
5. Atchuta Rao D., and Ram Babu H.V. Quantitative interpretation of self-potential anomalies due to two-dimensional sheet like bodies. Geophysics 48 (1983) 1659-1664
6. Banerjee B. Quantitative interpretation of self potential anomalies of some specific geometries. Pure and Applied Geophysics 90 (1971) 138-152
7. Bhattacharya B.B., and Roy N. A note on the use of a nomogram for self-potential anomalies. Geophysical Prospecting 29 (1981) 102-104
8. Bhattacharya B.B., Biswas D., Kar G., and Ghosh H. Geoelectric exploration for graphite in the Balangir district, Orissa, India. Geoexploration 22 (1984) 129-143
9. Bhattacharya B.B., Shalivahan, Jardani A., and Bera A. Three-dimensional probability tomography of self-potential anomalies of graphite and sulphide mineralization in Orissa and Rajasthan, India. Near Surface Geophysics 5 (2007) 223-230
10. Bockris J.O.M., and Reddy A.K.N. Modern Electrochemistry Vol. 1 (1998), Plenum Press, New York 820 pp
11. Corwin R.F., Demoully G.T., Harding R.S., and Morrison H.F. Interpretation of self-potential survey results from the east Mesa geothermal field. Journal of Geophysical Research 86 (1981) 1848-1871
12. Fitterman D.V., and Corwin R.F. Inversion of self-potential data from the Cerro Prieto geothermal field Mexico. Geophysics 47 (1982) 938-945
13. Golub G. Numerical methods for solving linear least squares problems. Numerische Mathematik 7 (1965) 206-216
14. Iuliano T., Mauriello P., and Patella D. Looking inside mount Vesuvius by potential fields integrated probability tomographies. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 113 (2002) 363-378
15. Jardani A., Revil A., and Dupont J.-P. Self-potential tomography applied to the determination of cavities. Geophysical Research Letters 33 (2006) L13401 10.1029/2006GL026028
16. Jardani A., Revil A., Boleve A., Crespy A., Dupont J.-P., and Barrash W. Tomography of the Darcy velocity from self potential measurements. Geophysical Research Letters 34 (2007) L24403 10.1029/2007GL031907
17. Mohan N.L., Sundarajan N., and Seshagiri Rao S.V. Interpretation of some two-dimensional magnetic bodies using Hilbert transforms. Geophysics 47 (1982) 376-387
18. Mendonça C.A. Forward and inverse self-potential modeling in mineral exploration. Geophysics 73 (2008) F33-F43 10.1190/1.2821191
19. Minsley, B.J., 2007. Modeling and inversion of self-potential data. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA.
20. Minsley B.J., Sogade J., and Morgan F.D. Three-dimensional source inversion of self-potential data. Journal of Geophysical Research 112 (2007) B02202 10.1029/2006JB004262
21. Murty B.V.S., and Haricharan P. Nomogram for the complete interpretation of spontaneous polarization profiles over sheet like and cylindrical two-dimensional sources. Geophysics 50 (1985) 1127-1135
22. Mushayandebvu M.F., van Driel P., Reid A.B., and Fairhead J.D. Magnetic source parameters of two-dimensional structures using extended Euler deconvolution. Geophysics 66 (2001) 814-823
23. Nabighian M.N. The analytic signal of two dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section: its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation. Geophysics 37 (1972) 507-517
24. Patella D. Introduction to ground surface self-potential tomography. Geophysical Prospecting 45 (1997) 653-681
25. Patella D. Self-potential global tomography including topographic effects. Geophysical Prospecting 45 (1997) 843-863
26. Paul M.K. Direct interpretation of self-potential anomalies caused by inclined sheets of infinite horizontal extensions. Geophysics 30 (1965) 418-423
27. Rao B.S.R., Murthy I.V.R., and Reddy S.J. Interpretation of self-potential anomalies of some geometric bodies. Pure and Applied Geophysics 78 (1970) 66-77
28. Revil A., Ehouarne L., and Thyreault E. Tomography of self-potential anomalies of electrochemical nature. Geophysical Research Letters 28 (2001) 4363-4366
29. Srivastava S., and Agarwal B.N.P. Interpretation of self-potential anomalies by enhanced local wave number technique. Journal of Applied Geophysics 68 (2009) 259-268 10.1016/j.appgeo.2008.11.011
30. Stoll J., Bigalke J., and Grabner E.W. Electrochemical modelling of self-potential anomalies. Surveys in Geophysics 16 (1995) 107-120
31. Sundarajan N., and Srinivas Y. A modified Hilbert transform and its application to self potential interpretation. Journal of Applied Geophysics 36 (1996) 137-143
32. Sundarajan N., Srinivasa Rao P., and Sunitha V. An analytical method to interpret self-potential anomalies caused by 2-D inclined sheet. Geophysics 63 (1998) 1151-1155
33. Telford W.M., Geldart L.P., Sheriff R.E., and Keys D.A. Applied Geophysics (1976), Cambridge University Press, New York 860 pp
34. Thompson D.T. EULDPH-a new technique for making computer assisted depth estimates from magnetic data. Geophysics 47 (1982) 31-37
35. Yungul S. Interpretation of spontaneous polarization anomalies caused by spherical ore bodies. Geophysics 15 (1950) 237-246
36. Zhody A.A.R., Anderson L.A., and Muffler L.J.P. Resistivity, self-potential and induced polarization surveys of a vapour dominated geothermal system. Geophysics 38 (1973) 1130-1144