Automatic conversion of magnetic data to depth, dip, and susceptibility contrast using the SPI (TM) method

Geophysics

Volumn 62, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 807-813

  Thurston, Jeffrey B ^a   Smith, Richard S ^a  

^a CGG   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GEOLOGIC MODELS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE UNDERSTANDING; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; MAGNETIC PERMEABILITY; MAGNETIZATION; REMANENCE; TECTONICS;

SOURCE PARAMETER IMAGING (SPI);

MAGNETIC PROSPECTING;

IMAGE PROCESSING; MAGNETIC DATA; SOURCE PARAMETER IMAGING METHOD;

EID: 0031147910     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.1444190     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Atchuta Rao, D., Ram Babu, H. V., and Sanker Narayan, P. V., 1981, Interpretation of magnetic anomalies due to dikes: The complex gradient method: Geophysics, 46, 1572-1578.
2. Baranov, V., 1957, A new method for interpretation of aeromagnetic maps: pseudo-gravimetric anomalies: Geophysics, 22, 359-383.
3. Bracewell, R., 1965, The Fourier transform and its applications: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
4. Cant, D. J., 1988, Regional structure and development of the Peace River Arch, Alberta: A Paleozoic failed-rift system? Bull. Can. Petr. Geol., 36, 284-295.
5. Grant, F. S., and West, G. F., 1965, Interpretation theory in applied geophysics: McGraw Hill Book Co.
6. Hartman, R. R., Teskey, D. J., and Friedberg, J. L., 1971, A system for rapid digital aeromagnetic interpretation: Geophysics, 36, 891-918.
7. Hsu, S.-K., Sibuet, J.-C., and Shyu C.-T., 1996, High-resolution detection of geologic boundaries from potential-field anomalies: An enhanced analytic signal technique: Geophysics, 61, 373-386.
8. Jain, S., 1976, An automatic method of direct interpretation of magnetic profiles: Geophysics, 41, 531-541.
9. Nabighian, M. N., 1972, The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section: Its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation: Geophysics, 37, 507-517.
10. _1984, Toward a three-dimensional automatic interpretation of potential-field data via generalized Hubert transforms: Fundamental relations: Geophysics, 49, 780-786.
11. Naudy, H., 1971, Automatic determination of depth on aeromagnetic profiles: Geophysics, 36, 712-722.
12. Peters, L. J., 1949, The direct approach to magnetic interpretation and its practical application: Geophysics, 14, 290-320.
13. Reid, A. B., Allsop, J. M., Granser, H., Millet, A. J., and Somerton, I. W., 1990, Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution: Geophysics, 55, 80-91.
14. Reford, M. S., 1964, Magnetic anomalies over thin sheets: Geophysics, 29, 532-536.
15. Roest, W. R., Verhoef, J., and Pilkington, M., 1992, Magnetic interpretation using the 3-D analytic signal: Geophysics, 57, 116-125.
16. Ross, G. M., Parrish, R. R., Villeneuve, M. E., and Bowring, S. A., 1991, Geophysics and geochronology of the crystalline basement of the Alberta Basin, western Canada: Can. J. Earth Sci., 28, 512-522.
17. Spector, A., and Lawler, T. L., 1995, Application of aeromagnetic data to mineral potential evaluation in Minnesota: Geophysics, 60, 1704-1714.
18. Taner, M. T., Koehler, F., and Sheriff, R. E., 1979, Complex seismic trace analysis: Geophysics, 44, 1041-1063.
19. Thompson, D. T., 1982, EULDPH: A new technique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data: Geophysics, 47, 31-37.
20. Thurston, J. B., and Brown, R. J., 1994, Automated source-edge location with a new variable pass-band horizontal-gradient operator: Geophysics, 59, 546-554.
21. Zeit, C. A., and Ellis, R. M., 1989, Seismic structure of the crust and upper mantle in the Peace River Arch region, Canada: J. Geophys. Res., 94, No. B5, 5729-5744.