A combined analytic signal and Euler method (AN-EUL) for automatic interpretation of magnetic data

Geophysics

Volumn 68, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 1952-1961

  Salem, Ahmed ^a,b   Ravat, Dhananjay ^c  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NUCLEAR MATERIALS AUTHORITY   (Egypt)

^c SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GEOLOGY; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; DATA REDUCTION; GEOMAGNETISM; GEOPHYSICS; HYDRAULIC STRUCTURES; LOCATION; OBJECT DETECTION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

EULER DECONVOLUTION METHODS; MAGNETIC SOURCES; AIRBORNE MAGNETIC DATA; APPROXIMATE GEOMETRIES; EULER DECONVOLUTION; GEOPHYSICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING; GEOPHYSICAL TECHNIQUES; GROUND MAGNETIC DATA; SOURCE PARAMETERS; THEORETICAL SIMULATION;

GEOPHYSICS; MAGNETIC STORAGE;

AUTOMATION; DATA PROCESSING; MAGNETIC SURVEY;

EID: 0346724793     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.1635049     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Atchuta Rao, D., Ram Babu, H. V., and Sanker Narayan P. V., 1981, Interpretation of magnetic anomalies due to dikes: The complex gradient method: Geophysics, 46, 1572-1578.
2. Bastani, M., and Pedersen, L. B., 2001, Automatic interpretation of magnetic dikes parameters using the analytic signal technique: Geophysics, 66, 551-561.
3. Blakely, R. J., 1995, Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications: Cambridge Univ. Press.
4. Debeglia, N., and Corpel, J., 1997, Automatic 3-D interpretation of potential field data using analytic signal derivatives: Geophysics, 62, 87-96.
5. Gamey, T. J., Doll, W. E., and Bell, D. T., 2000, Airborne UXO detection technology demonstration: Proc. Symp. on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (SAGEEP'2000), 57-66.
6. Hildenbrand, T. G., and Ravat, D., 1997, Geophysical setting of the Wabash Valley fault system: Seis. Res. Lett., 68, 567-585.
7. Hsu, S. K., Sibuet, J. C., and Shyu, C. T., 1996, High-resolution detection of geologic boundaries from potential anomalies: An enhanced analytic signal technique: Geophysics, 61, 373-386.
8. Hsu, S. K., Coppens, D., and Shyu, C. T., 1998, Depth to magnetic source using the generalized analytic signal: Geophysics, 63, 1947-1957.
9. Kirkham, K., 2001, Investigations of a high-resolution aeromagnetic survey over the southeastern portion of the Illinois Basin: M.Sc. thesis, Southern Illinois University of Carbondale.
10. MacLeod, I. N., Jones, K., and Dai, T. F., 1993, 3-D Analytic signal in the interpretation of total magnetic field data at low magnetic latitudes: Expl. Geophys., 24, 679-688.
11. Nabighian, M. N., 1972, The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section: Its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation: Geophysics, 37, 507-517.
12. Nabighian, M. N., 1974, Additional comments on the analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section: Geophysics, 39, 85-92.
13. Nabighian, M. N., 1984, Toward a three-dimensional automatic interpretation of potential-field data via generalized Hilbert transforms: Fundamental relations: Geophysics, 49, 780-786.
14. Nelson, J. B., 1988, Comparison of gradient analysis techniques for two-dimensional magnetic sources: Geophysics, 53, 1088-1095.
15. Pedersen, L. B., 1989, Relations between horizontal and vertical gradients of potential fields: Geophysics, 54, 662, 663.
16. Ravat, D., 1996a, Analysis of the Euler method and its applicability in environmental magnetic investigations: J. Environmental. Eng. Geophys., 1, 229-238.
17. Ravat, D., 1996b, Magnetic properties of unrusted steel drums from laboratory and field-magnetic measurements: Geophysics, 61, 1325-1335.
18. Reid, A. B., Allsop, J. M., Granser, H., Millet, A. J., and Somerton, I. W., 1990, Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution: Geophysics, 55, 80-91.
19. Roest, W. R., Verhoef, J., and Pilkington, M., 1992, Magnetic interpretation using 3-D analytic signal: Geophysics, 57, 116-125.
20. Salem, A., Ravat, D., Gamey, T. J., and Ushijima, K., 2002, Analytic signal approach and its applicability in environmental magnetic investigations, J. Appl. Geophys., 49, 231-244.
21. Smith, R. S., Thurston, J. B., Dai, T. F., and MacLeod, I. N., 1998, iSPI- the improved source parameters imaging method: Geophys. Prosp., 46, 141-151.
22. Talwani, M., 1965, Computation with the help of a digital computer of magnetic anomalies caused by arbitrary shape: Geophysics, 30, 797-817.
23. Thompson, D. T., 1982, "EULDPH" A new technique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data: Geophysics. 47, 31-37.
24. Thurston, J. B., and Smith, R. S., 1997, Automatic conversion of magnetic data to depth, dip, susceptibility contrast using the SPI method: Geophysics, 62, 807-813.
25. Thurston, J., Guillon, J. C., and Smith, R., 1999, Model-independent depth estimation with the SPI method: 69th Ann. Internat. Mtg: Soc. of Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 403-406.
26. Wasilewski, P. J., and Mayhew, M. A., 1992, The Moho as a magnetic boundary revisited: Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 2259-2262.