FORTRAN codes to implement enhanced local wave number technique to determine the depth and location and shape of the causative source using magnetic anomaly

Computers and Geosciences

Volumn 34, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1843-1849

  Agarwal, B N P ^a   Srivastava, Shalivahan ^a  

^a INDIAN SCHOOL OF MINES   (India)

Author keywords

FORTRAN codes; Structural index; Two dimensional source

Indexed keywords

CODES (SYMBOLS); COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; FORTRAN (PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE); INDEXING (MATERIALS WORKING);

FORTRAN CODES; FORTRAN LANGUAGE; HIGH-FREQUENCY NOISE; LOCAL WAVE; MAGNETIC ANOMALIES; OBSERVED DATA; ONTARIO , CANADA; PEAK POSITIONS; SOURCE CODING; SOURCE GEOMETRY; STRUCTURAL INDEX; STRUCTURAL INDEXING; TWO-DIMENSIONAL SOURCE;

CODES (STANDARDS);

AEROMAGNETIC SURVEY; DATA PROCESSING; GEOMETRY; MAGNETIC ANOMALY; THEORETICAL STUDY; TWO-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA; ONTARIO [CANADA];

EID: 52049085754     PISSN: 00983004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2007.10.012     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Agarwal B.N.P., and Lal T. A generalized method of computing second derivative of gravity field. Geophysical Prospecting 20 (1972) 385-394
2. Agarwal B.N.P., and Lal T. Calculation of the vertical gradient of the gravity field using the Fourier transform. Geophysical Prospecting 20 (1972) 448-458
3. Elkins T.A. The second derivative method of gravity interpretation. Geophysics 16 (1951) 29-50
4. Golub G. Numerical methods for solving linear least squares problems. Numerische Mathematik 7 (1965) 206-216
5. Keating P., and Pilkington M. Euler deconvolution of the analytic signal and its application to magnetic interpretation. Geophysical Prospecting 52 (2004) 165-182
6. Ku C.C., and Sharp J.A. Werner method for automated magnetic interpretation and its refinement using Marquardt inverse modeling. Geophysics 48 (1983) 754-774
7. Li X. On the use of different methods for estimating magnetic depth. The Leading Edge 22 (2003) 1090-1099
8. Nabighian M.N. The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section: its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation. Geophysics 37 (1972) 507-517
9. Naudy H. Automatic determination of depth on aeromagnetic profile. Geophysics 36 (1971) 717-722
10. Ontario Geological Survey, 2000. Ontario airborne geophysical surveys, magnetic and electromagnetic data, Matheson area. Geophysical Data Set 1101.
11. Peters L.J. The direct approach to magnetic interpretation and its practical application. Geophysics 14 (1949) 290-320
12. Peters L.J., and Elkins T.A. Discussion by Leo J. Peters and Thomas A. Elkins. Geophysics 18 (1953) 907-909
13. Ridsdill-Smith T.A., and Dentith M.C. The wavelet transform in aeromagnetic processing. Geophysics 64 (1999) 1003-1013
14. Rosenbach O. A contribution to the computation of the second derivative from gravity data. Geophysics 18 (1953) 894-908
15. Rosenbach O. A reply to discussion by Leo J. Peters and Thomas A. Elkins. Geophysics 18 (1953) 909-912
16. Salem A., and Smith R.S. Depth and structural index from the normalized local wave-number of 2D magnetic anomalies. Geophysical Prospecting 51 (2005) 83-89
17. Salem A., Ravat D., Smith S., and Ushijima K. Interpretation of magnetic data using an enhanced local wave number (ELW) method. Geophysics 70 (2005) L7-L12
18. ™-the improved source parameter imaging method. Geophysical Prospecting 46 (1998) 141-151
19. Thompson D.T. EULDPH-a new technique for making computer assisted depth estimates from magnetic data. Geophysics 47 (1982) 31-37
20. ™ method. Geophysics 62 (1997) 807-813
21. Thurston J.B., Smith R.S., and Guillon J.-C. A multimodel method for depth estimation from magnetic data. Geophysics 67 (2002) 555-561
22. Vallee M.A., Keating P., Smith R.S., and St-Hilaire C. Estimating depth and model type using the continuous wavelet transform of the magnetic data. Geophysics 69 (2004) 191-199