Physicochemical Determinants of Chaperone Requirements

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 400, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 579-588

  Tartaglia, Gian Gaetano ^a   Dobson, Christopher M ^a   Hartl, F Ulrich ^b   Vendruscolo, Michele ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Molecular chaperones; Protein abundance; Protein homeostasis; Protein solubility

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONE; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; HOMEOSTASIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; QUALITY CONTROL; SOLUBILITY;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

EID: 77954385581     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.03.066     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Chiti F., Dobson C.M. Protein misfolding, functional amyloid, and human disease. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2006, 75:333-366.
2. Haass C., Selkoe D.J. Soluble protein oligomers in neurodegeneration: lessons from the Alzheimer's amyloid beta-peptide. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8:101-112.
3. Lesne S., Koh M.T., Kotilinek L., Kayed R., Glabe C.G., Yang A., et al. A specific amyloid-beta protein assembly in the brain impairs memory. Nature 2006, 440:352-357.
4. Mattson M.P. Pathways towards and away from Alzheimer's disease. Nature 2004, 430:631-639.
5. Silveira J.R., Raymond G.J., Hughson A.G., Race R.E., Sim V.L., Hayes S.F., Caughey B. The most infectious prion protein particles. Nature 2005, 437:257-261.
6. Dobson C.M. Protein folding and misfolding. Nature 2003, 426:884-890.
7. Ellis R.J. Macromolecular crowding: obvious but underappreciated. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2001, 26:597-604.
8. Powers E.T., Morimoto R.I., Dillin A., Kelly J.W., Balch W.E. Biological and chemical approaches to diseases of proteostasis deficiency. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2009, 78:959-991.
9. Tartaglia G.G., Pechmann S., Dobson C.M., Vendruscolo M. Life on the edge: a link between gene expression levels and aggregation rates of human proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2007, 32:204-206.
10. Chiti F., Stefani M., Taddei N., Ramponi G., Dobson C.M. Rationalization of the effects of mutations on peptide and protein aggregation rates. Nature 2003, 424:805-808.
11. Fernandez-Escamilla A.M., Rousseau F., Schymkowitz J., Serrano L. Prediction of sequence-dependent and mutational effects on the aggregation of peptides and proteins. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004, 22:1302-1306.
12. Tartaglia G.G., Pawar A.P., Campioni S., Dobson C.M., Chiti F., Vendruscolo M. Prediction of aggregation-prone regions in structured proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 380:425-436.
13. Tartaglia G.G., Pechmann S., Dobson C.M., Vendruscolo M. A relationship between mRNA expression levels and protein solubility in E. coli. J. Mol. Biol. 2009, 388:381-389.
14. Kerner M.J., Naylor D.J., Ishihama Y., Maier T., Chang H.C., Stines A.P., et al. Proteome-wide analysis of chaperonin-dependent protein folding in Escherichia coli. Cell 2005, 122:209-220.
15. Ishihama Y., Schmidt T., Rappsilber J., Mann M., Hartl F.U., Kerner M.J., Frishman D. Protein abundance profiling of the Escherichia coli cytosol. BMC Genomics 2008, 9.
16. Frydman J. Folding of newly translated proteins in vivo: the role of molecular chaperones. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2001, 70:603-647.
17. Horwich A.L., Fenton W.A., Chapman E., Farr G.W. Two families of chaperonin: physiology and mechanism. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2007, 23:115-145.
18. Hartl F.U., Hayer-Hartl M. Converging concepts of protein folding in vitro and in vivo. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16:574-581.
19. Kramer G., Boehringer D., Ban N., Bukau B. The ribosome as a platform for co-translational processing, folding and targeting of newly synthesized proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16:589-597.
20. Hartl F.U., Hayer-Hartl M. Protein folding-molecular chaperones in the cytosol: from nascent chain to folded protein. Science 2002, 295:1852-1858.
21. Dubay K.F., Pawar A.P., Chiti F., Zurdo J., Dobson C.M., Vendruscolo M. Prediction of the absolute aggregation rates of amyloidogenic polypeptide chains. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 341:1317-1326.
22. Tartaglia G.G., Vendruscolo M. The Zyggregator method for predicting protein aggregation propensities. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37:1395-1401.
23. Chatellier J., Buckle A.M., Fersht A.R. GroEL recognises sequential and non-sequential linear structural motifs compatible with extended beta-strands and alpha-helices. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 292:163-172.
24. Horst R., Bertelsen E.B., Fiaux J., Wider G., Horwich A.L., Wuthrich K. Direct NMR observation of a substrate protein bound to the chaperonin GroEL. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102:12748-12753.
25. Stan G., Brooks B.R., Lorimer G.H., Thirumalai D. Residues in substrate proteins that interact witn GroEL in the capture process are buried in the native state. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103:4433-4438.
26. Sharma S., Chakraborty K., Mueller B.K., Astola N., Tang Y.C., Lamb D.C., et al. Monitoring protein conformation along the pathway of chaperonin-assisted folding. Cell 2008, 133:142-153.
27. Bussow K., Quedenau C., Sievert V., Tischer J., Scheich C., Seitz H., et al. A catalog of human cDNA expression clones and its application to structural genomics. Genome Biol. 2004, 5.
28. DePristo M.A., Weinreich D.M., Hartl D.L. Missense meanderings in sequence space: a biophysical view of protein evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2005, 6:678-687.
29. Kumar M.D.S., Bava K.A., Gromiha M.M., Prabakaran P., Kitajima K., Uedaira H., Sarai A. ProTherm and ProNIT: thermodynamic databases for proteins and protein-nucleic acid interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34:D204-D206.
30. Lu P., Vogel C., Wang R., Yao X., Marcotte E.M. Absolute protein expression profiling estimates the relative contributions of transcriptional and translational regulation. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25:117-124.
31. Bar-Even A., Paulsson J., Maheshri N., Carmi M., O'Shea E., Pilpel Y., Barkai N. Noise in protein expression scales with natural protein abundance. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38:636-643.
32. Raj A., van Oudenaarden A. Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences. Cell 2008, 135:216-226.
33. Selinger D.W., Cheung K.J., Mei R., Johansson E.M., Richmond C.S., Blattner F.R., et al. RNA expression analysis using a 30 base pair resolution Escherichia coli genome array. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000, 18:1262-1268.
34. Glover J.R., Lindquist S. Hsp104, Hsp70, and Hsp40: a novel chaperone system that rescues previously aggregated proteins. Cell 1998, 94:73-82.
35. Mogk A., Tomoyasu T., Goloubinoff P., Rudiger S., Roder D., Langen H., Bukau B. Identification of thermolabile Escherichia coli proteins: prevention and reversion of aggregation by DnaK and ClpB. EMBO J. 1999, 18:6934-6949.
36. Rudiger S., Germeroth L., SchneiderMergener J., Bukau B. Substrate specificity of the DnaK chaperone determined by screening cellulose-bound peptide libraries. EMBO J. 1997, 16:1501-1507.
37. Cortes C., Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 1995, 20:273-297.
38. Gong Y.C., Kakihara Y., Krogan N., Greenblatt J., Emili A., Zhang Z., Houry W.A. An atlas of chaperone-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: implications to protein folding pathways in the cell. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2009, 5.
39. Niwa T., Ying B.W., Saito K., Jin W., Takada S., Ueda T., Taguchi H. Bimodal protein solubility distribution revealed by an aggregation analysis of the entire ensemble of Escherichia coli proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:4201-4206.
40. Noivirt-Brik O., Unger R., Horovitz A. Low folding propensity and high translation efficiency distinguish in vivo substrates of GroEL from other Escherichia coli proteins. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:3276-3279.
41. Yam A.Y., Xia Y., Lin H.T.J., Burlingame A., Gerstein M., Frydman J. Defining the TRiC/CCT interactome links chaperonin function to stabilization of newly made proteins with complex topologies. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008, 15:1255-1262.
42. Rousseau F., Serrano L., Schymkowitz J.W.H. How evolutionary pressure against protein aggregation shaped chaperone specificity. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 355:1037-1047.
43. Janin J. Surface and inside volumes in globular proteins. Nature 1979, 277:491-492.
44. Chou P.Y., Fasman G.D. Prediction of the secondary structure of proteins from their amino acid sequence. Adv. Enzymol. 1978, 47:45-148.
45. Best R.B., Vendruscolo M. Structural interpretation of hydrogen exchange protection factors in proteins: characterization of the native state fluctuations of CI2. Structure 2006, 14:97-106.
46. Pace C.N., Scholtz J.M. A helix propensity scale based on experimental studies of peptides and proteins. Biophys. J. 1998, 75:422-427.
47. de la Paz M.L., Serrano L. Sequence determinants of amyloid fibril formation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101:87-92.
48. Meek J.L. Prediction of peptide retention times in high-pressure liquid-chromatography on the basis of amino-acid composition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1980, 77:1632-1636.
49. Gazit E. A possible role for pi-stacking in the self-assembly of amyloid fibrils. FASEB J. 2002, 16:77-83.
50. Xiong H.Y., Buckwalter B.L., Shieh H.M., Hecht M.H. Periodicity of polar and nonpolar amino-acids is the major determinant of secondary structure in self-assembling oligomeric peptides. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92:6349-6353.