GroEL recognises sequential and non-sequential linear structural motifs compatible with extended β-strands and α-helices

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 292, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 163-172

  Chatellier, Jean ^a   Buckle, Ashley M ^a   Fersht, Alan R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; CATION; CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE 1,4 BETA CELLOBIOSIDASE; CHAPERONIN; FUNGAL PROTEIN; MUTANT PROTEIN;

ALPHA HELIX; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BACTERIOPHAGE; BINDING AFFINITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME SUBSTRATE COMPLEX; GENE LIBRARY; HYDROPHOBICITY; NONHUMAN; PHAGE DISPLAY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN IMMOBILIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

EID: 0033543656     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3040     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Adey N. B., Mataragnon A. H., Rider J. E., Carter J. M., Kay B. K. Characterization of phage that bind plastic from phage-displayed random peptide libraries. Gene. 156:1995;27-31.
2. Altamirano M. M., Golbik R., Zahn R., Buckle A. M., Fersht A. R. Refolding chromatography with immobilized mini-chaperones. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1997;3576-3578.
3. Aoki K., Taguchi H., Shindo Y., Yoshida M., Ogasahara K., Yutani K., Tanaka N. Calorimetric observation of a GroEL-protein binding reaction with little contribution of hydrophobic interaction. J. Biol. Chem. 272:1997;32158-32162.
4. Blond-Elguindi S., Cwirla S. E., Dower W. J., Lipshutz R. J., Sprang S. R., Sambrook J. F., Gething M.-J. H. Affinity panning of a library of peptides displayed on bacteriophages reveals the binding specificity of BiP. Cell. 75:1993;717-728.
5. Braig K., Otwinowski Z., Hegde R., Boisvert D. C., Joachimiak A., Horwich A. L., Sigler P. B. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2. 8 Å Nature. 371:1994;578-586.
6. Brazil B. T., Cleland J. L., McDowell R. S., Skelton N. J., Paris K., Horowitz P. M. Model peptide studies demonstrate that amphipathic secondary structures can be recognized by the chaperonin GroEL (cpn60). J. Biol. Chem. 272:1997;5105-5111.
7. Buckle A. M., Zahn R., Fersht A. R. A structural model for GroEL-polypeptide recognition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1997;3571-3575.
8. Bukau B., Horwich A. L. The Hsp70 and Hsp60 chaperone machines. Cell. 92:1998;351-366.
9. Acta Crystallog. sect. D. 50:1994;760-763.
10. Chatellier J., Hill F., Lund P., Fersht A. R. In vivo activities of GroEL minichaperones. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 95:1998;9861-9866.
11. Clackson T., Hoogenboom H. R., Griffiths A. D., Winter G. Making antibody fragments using phage display libraries. Nature. 352:1991;624-628.
12. Corrales F. J., Fersht A. R. Toward a mechanism for GroEL-GroES chaperone activity: an ATPase-gated and -pulsed folding and annealing cage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;4509-4512.
13. Fenton W. A., Horwich A. L. GroEL-mediated protein folding. Protein Sci. 6:1997;743-760.
14. Fenton W. A., Kashi Y., Furtak K., Horwich A. L. Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release. Nature. 371:1994;614-619.
15. Gibson T. J. Studies on the Epstein-Barr virus genome. PhD thesis. 1984;University of Cambridge.
16. Goloubinoff P., Gatenby A. A., Lorimer G. H. GroE heat shock proteins promote assembly of foreign prokaryotic ribalose bis phosphate carboxylate oligomers in Escherichia coli. Nature. 337:1989;44-47.
17. Gragerov A., Zeng L., Zhao X., Burkholder W., Gottesman M. E. Specificity of DnaK-peptide binding. J. Mol. Biol. 235:1994;848-854.
18. Hartl F. U. Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding. Nature. 381:1996;571-580.
19. Hemmingsen S. M., Woolford C., van d. V. S., Tilly K., Dennis D. T., Georgopoulos C. P., Hendrix R. W., Ellis R. J. Homologous plant and bacterial proteins chaperone oligomeric protein assembly. Nature. 333:1988;330-334.
20. Hightower L. E., Sadis S. E., Takenaka I. M. The Biology of Heat Shock Proteins and Molecular Chaperones. 1994;Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor.
21. Horovitz A. Structural aspects of GroEL function. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8:1998;93-100.
22. Hunt J. F., van der Vies S., Henry L., Deisenhofer J. Structural adaptations in the specialized bacteriophage T4 co-chaperonin Gp31 expand the size of the Anfinsen cage. Cell. 90:1997;361-371.
23. Itzhaki L. S., Otzen D. E., Fersht A. R. Nature and consequences of GroEL-protein interactions. Biochemistry. 34:1995;14581-14587.
24. Kobayashi N., Freund S. M. V., Chatellia J., Zahn R., Fersht A. R. NMR analysis of the binding of a rhodanere peptide to a minichaperone in solution. J. Mol. Biol. 292:1999;181-190.
25. Kraulis P. MolScript, a program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallog. 24:1991;946-950.
26. Kraulis P. J., Clore G. M., Nilges M., Jones T. A., Pettersson G., Knowles J., Gronenborn A. M. Determination of the three-dimensional solution structure of the C-terminal domain of cellobiohydrolase I fromTrichoderma reesei . A study using nuclear magnetic resonance and hybrid distance geometry-dynamical simulated annealing. Biochemistry. 28:1989;7241-7257.
27. Landry S. J., Gierasch L. M. Recognition of nascent polypeptides for targeting and folding. Trends Biochem. Sci. 16:1991a;159-164.
28. Landry S. J., Gierasch L. M. The chaperonin GroEL binds a polypeptide in an alpha-helical conformation. Biochemistry. 30:1991b;7359-7362.
29. Landry S. J., Zeilstra R. J., Fayet O., Georgopoulos C., Gierasch L. M. Characterization of a functionally important mobile domain of GroES. Nature. 364:1993;255-558.
30. Landry S. J., Taher A., Georgopoulos C., van der Vies S. Interplay of structure and disorder in cochaperonin mobile loops. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;11622-11627.
31. Le Nguyen D., Heitz A., Chiche L., Castro B., Boigegrain R. A., Favel A., Coletti-Previero M. A. Molecular recognition between serine proteases and new bioactive microproteins with a knotted structure. Biochimie. 72:1990;431-435.
32. Linder M., Mattinen M.-L., Kontelli M., Lindeberg G., Ståhlberg J., Drakenberg T., Reinikainen T., Pettersson G., Annila A. Identification of functionally important amino acids in the cellulose-binding domain of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I. Protein Sci. 4:1995;1056-1064.
33. Lorimer G. H. A quantitative assessment of the role of the chaperonin proteins in protein folding in vivo. FASEB J. 10:1996;5-9.
34. Martin J., Langer T., Boteva R., Schramel A., Horwich A. L., Hartl F. U. Chaperonin-mediated protein folding at the surface of GroEL through a 'molten globule'-like intermediate. Nature. 352:1991;36-42.
35. McCafferty J., Griffiths A. D., Winter G., Chiswell D. J. Phage antibodies: filamentous phage displaying antibody variable domains. Nature. 348:1990;552-554.
36. Mendoza J. A., Butler M. C., Horowitz P. M. Characterization of a stable, reactivatable complex between chaperonin 60 and mitochondrial rhodanese. J. Biol. Chem. 267:1992;24648-24654.
37. Merritt E. A., Bacon D. J. Raster3D: photorealistic molecular graphics. Methods Enzymol. 277:1997;505-524.
38. Miroux B., Walker J. E. Over-production of proteins in Escherichia coli: mutant hosts that allow synthesis of some membrane proteins and globular proteins at high levels. J. Mol. Biol. 260:1996;289-298.
39. Peres Ben-Zvi A., Chatellier J., Fersht A. R., Goloubinoff P. Minimal and optimal mechanisms for GroE-mediated protein folding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 95:1998;15275-15280.
40. Perrett S., Zahn R., Stenberg G., Fersht A. R. Importance of electrostatic interactions in the rapid binding of polypeptides to GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 269:1997;892-901.
41. Richarme G., el Yaagoubi A., de Crouy-Chanel A., Kohiyama M. Specific interaction of the Escherichia coli chaperone GroEL (60-kDa heat shock protein) with the liganded form of the galactose binding protein. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Intern. 34:1994;955-961.
42. Roseman A. M., Chen S., White H., Braig K., Saibil H. R. The chaperonin ATPase cycle: mechanism of allosteric switching and movements of substrate-binding domains in GroEL. Cell. 87:1996;241-251.
43. Saibil H. R., Zheng D., Roseman A. M., Hunter A. S., Watson G. M. F., Chen S., auf der Mauer A., O'Hara B. P., Wood S. P., Mann N. H., Barnett L. K., Ellis R. J. ATP induces large quaternary rearrangements in a cage-like chaperonin structure. Curr. Biol. 3:1993;265-273.
44. Schmidt M., Buchner J. Interaction of GroE with an all-beta-protein. J. Biol. Chem. 267:1992;16829-16833.
45. Shtilerman M., Lorimer G. H., Englander S. W. Chaperonin function: folding by forced unfolding. Science. 284:1999;822-825.
46. Smith G. P. Filamentous fusion phage: novel expression vectors that display cloned antigens on the virion surface. Science. 228:1985;1315-1317.
47. Smith G., Patel S. U., Windass J. D., Thornton J. M., Winter G., Griffiths A. D. Small binding proteins selected from a combinatorial repertoire of knottins displayed on phage. J. Mol. Biol. 277:1998;317-332.
48. Todd M. J., Viitanen P. V., Lorimer G. H. Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: implications for facilitated protein folding. Science. 265:1994;659-666.
49. Tanaka N., Fersht A. R. Identification of substrate binding site of GroEL minichaperone in solution. J. Mol. Biol. 292:1999;173-180.
50. Weissman J. S., Kashi Y., Fenton W. A., Horwich A. L. GroEL-mediated protein folding proceeds by multiple rounds of binding and release of nonnative forms. Cell. 78:1994;693-702.
51. Weissman J. S., Rye H. S., Fenton W. A., Beechem J. M., Horwich A. L. Characterization of the active intermediate of a GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding reaction. Cell. 84:1996;481-490.
52. 7chaperonin complex. Nature. 388:1997;741-750.
53. Zahn R., Buckle A. M., Perrett S., Johnson C. M. J., Corrales F. J., Golbik R., Fersht A. R. Chaperone activity and structure of monomeric polypeptide binding domains of GroEL. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996a;15024-15029.
54. Zahn R., Perrett S., Stenberg G., Fersht A. R. Catalysis of amide proton exchange by the molecular chaperones GroEL and SecB. Science. 271:1996b;642-645.