Computer-aided diagnostic models in breast cancer screening

Imaging in Medicine

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 313-323

  Ayer, Turgay ^a   Ayvaci, Mehmet Us ^a   Liu, Ze Xiu ^a   Alagoz, Oguzhan ^a,b   Burnside, Elizabeth S ^a,b  

^a Wisconsin Electric Machines and Power Electronics Consortium   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

breast cancer; computer aided detection; computer aided diagnosis; mammography; MRI; ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BAYES THEOREM; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MODEL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; REVIEW; ULTRASOUND;

EID: 77954126930     PISSN: 17555191     EISSN: 17555205     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/iim.10.24     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Reddy M, Given-Wilson R: Screening for breast cancer. Womens Health Med. 3(1), 22-27 (2006).
2. Giger ML: Computer-aided diagnosis in radiology. Acad. Radiol. 9(1), 18-25 (2002).
3. Malich A, Boehm T, Facius M et al.: Differentiation of mammographically suspicious lesions: evaluation of breast ultrasound, MRI mammography and electrical impedance scanning as adjunctive technologies in breast cancer detection. Clin. Radiol. 56(4), 278-283 (2001).
4. Burhenne L, Wood S, D'Orsi C et al.: Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 215(2), 554-562 (2000).
5. Birdwell R, Ikeda D, O'Shaughnessy K, Sickles E: Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology 219(1), 192-202 (2001).
6. Brem RF, Baum J, Lechner M et al.: Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 181(3), 687-693 (2003).
7. Malich A, Sauner D, Marx C et al.: Infuence of breast lesion size and histologic fndings on tumor detection rate of a computer-aided detection system. Radiology 228(3), 851-856 (2003).
8. Malich A, Schmidt S, Fischer DR, Facius M, Kaiser WA: The performance of computer-aided detection when analyzing prior mammograms of newly detected breast cancers with special focus on the time interval from initial imaging to detection. Eur. J. Radiol. 69(3), 574-578 (2009).
9. Birdwell R, Bandodkar P, Ikeda D: Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting. Radiology 236(2), 451-457 (2005).
10. Cupples TE, Cunningham JE, Reynolds JC: Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 185(4), 944-950 (2005).
11. Dean JC, Ilvento CC: Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 187(1), 20-28 (2006).
12. Freer T, Ulissey M: Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 220(3), 781-786 (2001).
13. Hadjiiski L, Sahiner B, Chan HP: Advances in computer-aided diagnosis for breast cancer. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 18(1), 64-70 (2006).
14. Nishikawa RM: Current status and future directions of computer-aided diagnosis in mammography. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 31(4), 224-235 (2007).
15. Vyborny CJ, Giger ML, Nishikawa RM: Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 38(4), 725-740 (2000).
16. Elter M, Horsch A: CADx of mammographic masses and clustered microcalcifcations: a review. Med. Phys. 36(6), 2052-2068 (2009).
17. Dorrius MD, van Ooijen PMA: Computer-aided detection in breast magnetic resonance imaging: a review. Imaging Decisions 12(3), 29-36 (2008).
18. Wu Y, Giger M, Doi K, Vyborny C, Schmidt R, Metz C: Artifcial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiology 187(1), 81-87 (1993).
19. Baker J, Kornguth P, Lo J, Williford M, Floyd C Jr: Breast cancer: prediction with artifcial neural network based on BI-RADS standardized lexicon. Radiology 196(3), 817-822 (1995).
20. Lo JY, Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Floyd CE Jr: Effect of patient history data on the prediction of breast cancer from mammographic fndings with artifcial neural networks. Acad. Radiol. 6(1), 10-15 (1999).
21. Lo JY, Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Iglehart JD, Floyd CE Jr: Predicting breast cancer invasion with artifcial neural networks on the basis of mammographic features. Radiology 203 (1), 159-163 (1997).
22. Lo JY, Markey MK, Baker JA, Floyd CE Jr: Cross-institutional evaluation of BI-RADS predictive model for mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 178(2), 457-463 (2002).
23. Markey MK, Lo JY, Floyd CE Jr: Differences between computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses and that of calcifcations 1. Radiology 223(2), 489-493 (2002).
24. Fogel DB, Wasson EC, Boughton EM, Porto VW: A step toward computer-assisted mammography using evolutionary programming and neural networks. Cancer Lett. 119(1), 93-97 (1997).
25. Kahn CE, Roberts LM, Shaffer KA, Haddawy P: Construction of a Bayesian network for mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer. Comput. Biol. Med. 27(1), 19-29 (1997).
26. Jiang Y, Nishikawa RM, Wolverton DE et al.: Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifcations: automated feature ana lysis and classifcation. Radiology 198(3), 671-678 (1996).
27. Jiang Y, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, Metz CE, Giger ML, Doi K: Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis. Acad. Radiol. 6(1), 22-33 (1999).
28. Jiang Y, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, Toledano AY, Doi K: Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifcations. Radiology 220(3), 787-794 (2001).
29. Jiang Y, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, Metz CE: Comparison of independent double readings and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for the diagnosis of breast calcifcations. Acad. Radiol. 13(1), 84-94 (2006).
30. Rana RS, Jiang Y, Schmidt RA, Nishikawa RM, Liu B: Independent evaluation of computer classifcation of malignant and benign calcifcations in full-feld digital mammograms. Acad. Radiol. 14(3), 363-370 (2007).
31. Markopoulos C, Kouskos E, Koufopoulos K, Kyriakou V, Gogas J: Use of artifcial neural networks (computer ana lysis) in the diagnosis of microcalcifcations on mammography. Eur. J. Radiol. 39(1), 60-65 (2001).
32. Huo Z, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Wolverton DE, Metz CE: Computerized classifcation of benign and malignant masses on digitized mammograms: a study of robustness. Acad. Radiol. 7(12), 1077-1084 (2000).
33. Huo Z, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Wolverton DE, Schmidt RA, Doi K: Automated computerized classifcation of malignant and benign masses on digitized mammograms. Acad. Radiol. 5(3), 155-168 (1998).
34. Chan HP, Sahiner B, Helvie MA et al.: Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. Radiology 212(3), 817-827 (1999).
35. Huo Z, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Metz CE: Breast cancer: effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis observer study with independent database of mammograms. Radiology 224(2), 560-568 (2002).
36. Li H, Giger ML, Yuan Y et al.: Evaluation of computer-aided diagnosis on a large clinical full-feld digital mammographic dataset. Acad. Radiol. 15(11), 1437-1445 (2008).
37. Floyd CE Jr, Lo JY, Tourassi GD: Case-based reasoning computer algorithm that uses mammographic fndings for breast biopsy decisions. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 175(5), 1347-1352 (2000).
38. Elter M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Wittenberg T: The prediction of breast cancer biopsy outcomes using two CAD approaches that both emphasize an intelligible decision process. Med. Phys. 34(11), 4164-4172 (2007).
39. Hadjiiski L, Chan HP, Sahiner B et al.: Improvement in radiologists' characterization of malignant and benign breast masses on serial mammograms with computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. Radiology 233(1), 255-265 (2004).
40. Hadjiiski L, Sahiner B, Helvie MA et al.: Breast masses: computer-aided diagnosis with serial mammograms. Radiology 240(2), 343-356 (2006).
41. Gupta S, Chyn PF, Markey MK: Breast cancer CAD based on BI-RADS descriptors from two mammographic views. Med. Phys. 33(6), 1810-1817 (2006).
42. Wang XH, Zheng B, Good WF, King JL, Chang YH: Computer-assisted diagnosis of breast cancer using a data-driven Bayesian belief network. Int. J. Med. Inform. 54(2), 115-126 (1999).
43. Chhatwal J, Alagoz O, Lindstrom MJ, Kahn CE, Shaffer KA, Burnside ES: A logistic regression model based on the national mammography database format to aid breast cancer diagnosis. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 192(4), 1117-1127 (2009).
44. Burnside ES, Davis J, Chhatwal J et al.: Probabilistic computer model developed from clinical data in national mammography database format to classify mammographic fndings. Radiology 251(3), 663-672 (2009).
45. Ayer T, Alagoz O, Chhatwal J, Shavlik JW, Kahn CE, Burnside ES: An artifcial neural network to quantify malignancy risk based on mammography fndings: discrimination and calibration. Cancer (2010) (In Press).
46. Bilska-Wolak AO, Floyd CE, Lo JY, Baker JA: Computer aid for decision to biopsy breast masses on mammography validation on new cases 1. Acad. Radiol. 12(6), 671-680 (2005).
47. Giger M, Al-Hallaq H, Huo Z et al.: Computerized ana lysis of lesions in US images of the breast. Acad. Radiol. 6(11), 665-674 (1999).
48. Chen D, Chang R, Huang Y: Computer-aided diagnosis applied to US of solid breast nodules by using neural networks 1. Radiology 213(2), 407-412 (1999).
49. Chen CM, Chou YH, Han KC et al.: Breast lesions on sonograms: computer-aided diagnosis with nearly setting-independent features and artifcial neural networks. Radiology 226(2), 504-514 (2003).
50. Horsch K, Giger M, Venta L, Vyborny C: Computerized diagnosis of breast lesions on ultrasound. Med. Phys. 29(1), 157-164 (2002). (Pubitemid 34157988)
51. Sahiner B, Chan HP, Roubidoux MA et al.: Computerized characterization of breast masses on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes. Med. Phys. 31(4), 744-754 (2004).
52. Drukker K, Gruszauskas NP, Sennett CA, Giger ML: Breast US computer-aided diagnosis workstation: performance with a large clinical diagnostic population. Radiology 248(2), 392-397 (2008).
53. Horsch K, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Lan L, Mendelson EB, Hendrick RE: Classifcation of breast lesions with multimodality computer-aided diagnosis: observer study results on an independent clinical dataset. Radiology 240(2), 357-368 (2006).
54. Sahiner B, Chan H-P, Hadjiiski LM et al.: Multi-modality CADx: ROC study of the effect on radiologists' accuracy in characterizing breast masses on mammograms and 3D ultrasound images. Acad. Radiol. 16(7), 810-818 (2009).
55. Chang RF, Huang SF, Moon WK, Lee YH, Chen DR: Solid breast masses: neural network ana lysis of vascular features at three-dimensional power Doppler US for benign or malignant classifcation. Radiology 243(1), 56-62 (2007).
56. Joo S, Yang Y, Moon W, Kim H: Computer-aided diagnosis of solid breast nodules: use of an artifcial neural network based on multiple sonographic features. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 23(10), 1292-1300 (2004).
57. Song JH, Venkatesh SS, Conant EA, Arger PH, Sehgal CM: Comparative ana lysis of logistic regression and artifcial neural network for computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses. Acad. Radiol. 12(4), 487-495 (2005).
58. Shen WC, Chang RF, Moon WK, Chou YH, Huang CS: Breast ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis using BI-RADS features. Acad. Radiol. 14(8), 928-939 (2007).
59. Chen DR, Hsiao YH: Computer-aided diagnosis in breast ultrasound. J. Med. Ultrasound 16(1), 46-56 (2008).
60. Gruszauskas NP, Drukker K, Giger ML, Sennett CA, Pesce LL: Performance of breast ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis: dependence on image selection. Acad. Radiol. 15(10), 1234-1245 (2008).
61. Cui J, Sahiner B, Chan HP et al.: A new automated method for the segmentation and characterization of breast masses on ultrasound images. Med. Phys. 36(5), 1553-1565 (2009).
62. Yap MH, Edirisinghe E, Bez H: Processed images in human perception: a case study in ultrasound breast imaging. Eur. J. Radiol. 73(3), 682-687 (2010).
63. Suri JS, Rangayyan RM (Eds): Recent Advances in Breast Imaging, Mammography, and Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Breast Cancer. The International Society for Optical Engineering, WA, USA (2006).
64. Moore SG, Shenoy PG, Fanucchi L, Tumeh JW, Flowers CR: Cost-effectiveness of MRI compared with mammography for breast cancer screening in a high risk population. BMC Health Serv. Res. 9, 9 (2009).
65. Plevritis SK, Kurian AW, Sigal BM et al.: Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA 295(20), 2374-2384 (2006).
66. Szabó BK, Wiberg MK, Bone B, Aspelin P: Application of artifcial neural networks to the ana lysis of dynamic MR imaging features of the breast. Eur. J. Radiol. 14(7), 1217-1225 (2004).
67. Nattkemper T, Arnrich B, Lichte O et al.: Evaluation of radiological features for breast tumour classifcation in clinical screening with machine learning methods. Artif. Intell. Med. 34(2), 129-139 (2005).
68. Meinel LA, Stolpen AH, Berbaum KS, Fajardo LL, Reinhardt JM: Breast MRI lesion classifcation: improved performance of human readers with a backpropagation neural network computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 25(1), 89-95 (2007).
69. Deurloo E, Muller S, Peterse J, Besnard A, Gilhuijs K: Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions on MR images: potential effect of computerized assessment on clinical reading 1. Radiology 234(3), 693-701 (2005).
70. Williams T, DeMartini W, Partridge S, Peacock S, Lehman C: Breast MR imaging: computer-aided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant Lesions 1. Radiology 244(1), 94-103 (2007).
71. Lehman C, Peacock S, DeMartini W, Chen X: A new automated software system to evaluate breast MR examinations: improved specifcity without decreased sensitivity. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 187(1), 51-56 (2006).
72. Nie K, Chen JH, Yu HJ, Chu Y, Nalcioglu O, Su MY: Quantitative ana lysis of lesion morphology and texture features for diagnostic prediction in breast MRI. Acad. Radiol. 15(12), 1513-1525 (2008).
73. Baltzer PAT, Renz DM, Kullnig PE, Gajda M, Camara O, Kaiser WA: Application of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in MR-mammography (MRM): do we really need whole lesion time curve distribution ana lysis? Acad. Radiol. 16(4), 435-442 (2009).
74. Baltzer PAT, Freiberg C, Beger S et al.: Clinical MR-mammography: are computer-assisted methods superior to visual or manual measurements for curve type ana lysis? A Systematic Approach. Acad. Radiol. 16(9), 1070-1076 (2009).
75. Cook NR: Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction. Circulation 115(7), 928-935 (2007).
76. Cook NR: Statistical evaluation of prognostic versus diagnostic models: beyond the ROC curve. Clin. Chem. 54(1), 17-23 (2008).