Current status and future directions of computer-aided diagnosis in mammography

Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics

Volumn 31, Issue 4-5, 2007, Pages 224-235

  Nishikawa, Robert M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Clinical evaluation; Computer aided detection; Computer aided diagnosis; Mammography; Observer studies; ROC analysis

Indexed keywords

MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TUMORS;

BREAST CANCER; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; OBSERVER STUDIES; ROC ANALYSIS;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS;

ARTICLE; CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; NOISE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; SIMULATION; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAMMOGRAPHY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34247169972     PISSN: 08956111     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2007.02.009     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2006 (2006), American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
2. Anderson I., Aspegren K., Janzon L., et al. Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmo mammographic screening trial. Br Med J 297 (1988) 943-948
3. Shapiro S., Venet W., Strax P.H., Venet L., and Roeset R. Ten to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 69 (1982) 349-355
4. Tabar L., Yen M.F., Vitak B., Tony Chen H.H., Smith R.A., and Duffy S.W. Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening. Lancet 361 9367 (2003) 1405-1410
5. Berry D.A., Cronin K.A., Plevritis S.K., et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353 17 (2005) 1784-1792
6. Pisano E.D., Gatsonis C., Hendrick E., et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353 17 (2005) 1773-1783
7. Andersson I. What can we learn from interval carcinomas?. Recent Results Cancer Res. 90 (1984) 161-163
8. Frisell J., Eklund G., Hellstrom L., and Somell A. Analysis of interval breast carcinomas in a randomized screening trial in Stockholm. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 9 (1987) 219-225
9. Harvey J.A., Fajardo L.L., and Innis C.A. Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective versus blinded interpretation. Am J Roentgenol 161 (1993) 1167-1172
10. Holland T., Mrvunac M., Hendriks J.H.C.L., and Bekker B.V. So-called interval cancers of the breast. Pathologic and radiographic analysis. Cancer 49 (1982) 2527-2533
11. Ma L., Fishell E., Wright B., Hanna W., Allen S., and Boyd N.F. A controlled study of the factors associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 84 (1992) 781-785
12. Martin J.E., Moskowitz M., and Milbrath J.R. Breast cancers missed by mammography. Am J Roentgenol 132 (1979) 737-739
13. Peeters P.H.M., Verbeek A.L.M., Hendriks J.H.C.L., Holland R., Mrvunac M., and Vooijs G.P. The occurrence of interval cancers in the Nijmegen screening programme. Br J Cancer 59 (1989) 929-932
14. Smith-Bindman R., Chu P.W., Miglioretti D.L., et al. Comparison of Screening Mammography in the United States and the United Kingdom. J Am Med Assoc 290 (2003) 2129-2137
15. Boone JM, Kwan AL, Yang K, Burkett GW, Lindfors KK, Nelson TR. Computed tomography for imaging the breast. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia; 2006.
16. Boone J.M., Nelson T.R., Lindfors K.K., and Seibert J.A. Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation. Radiology 221 3 (2001) 657-667
17. Chen B., and Ning R. Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study. Med Phys 29 5 (2002) 755-770
18. Niklason L.T., Christian B.T., Niklason L.E., et al. Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 205 2 (1997) 399-406
19. Chan H.P., Wei J., Sahiner B., et al. Computer-aided detection system for breast masses on digital tomosynthesis mammograms: preliminary experience. Radiology 237 3 (2005) 1075-1080
20. Reiser I., Nishikawa R.M., Giger M.L., et al. Computerized mass detection for digital breast tomosynthesis directly from the projection images. Med Phys 33 2 (2006) 482-491
21. Barlow W.E., Chi C., Carney P.A., et al. Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. J Natl Cancer Inst 96 24 (2004) 1840-1850
22. Elmore J.G., Nakano C.Y., Koepsell T.D., Desnick L.M., D'Orsi C.J., and Ransohoff D.F. International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs. J Natl Cancer Inst 95 18 (2003) 1384-1393
23. Beam C.A., Layde P.M., and Sullivan D.C. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample. Arch Intern Med 156 2 (1996) 209-213
24. Elmore J.G., Wells C.K., Lee C.H., Howard D.H., and Feinstein A.R. Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. N Engl J Med 331 22 (1994) 1493-1499
25. Getty D.J., Pickett R.M., D'Orsi C.J., and Swets J.A. Enhanced interpretation of diagnostic images. Invest Radiol 23 (1988) 240-252
26. Horsch K., Giger M.L., Vyborny C.J., Lan L., Mendelson E.B., and Hendrick R.E. Classification of breast lesions with multimodality computer-aided diagnosis: observer study results on an independent clinical data set. Radiology 240 2 (2006) 357-368
27. Huo Z., Giger M.L., Vyborny C.J., and Metz C.E. Effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis-observer study with independent database of mammograms. Radiology 224 (2002) 560-568
28. Jiang Y., Nishikawa R.M., Schmidt R.A., Metz C.E., Giger M.L., and Doi K. Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis. Acad Radiol 6 1 (1999) 22-33
29. Winsberg F., Elkin M., Macy J., Bordaz V., and Weymouth W. Detection of radiographic abnormalities in mammograms by means of optical scanning and computer analysis. Radiology 89 (1967) 211-215
30. Chan H.-P., Doi K., Vyborny C.J., et al. Improvement in radiologists' detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: the potential of computer-aided diagnosis. Invest Radiol 25 10 (1990) 1102-1110
31. Kobayashi T., Xu X.-W., MacMahon H., Metz C.E., and Doi K. Effect of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme on radiologists' performance in detection of lung nodules on radiographs. Radiology 199 (1996) 843-848
32. Abe K., Doi K., MacMahon H., et al. Computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiography: analysis of results in a large clinical series. Invest Radiol 28 (1993) 987-993
33. Abe H., MacMahon H., Engelmann R., et al. Computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiography: results of large-scale observer tests at the 1996-2001 RSNA scientific assemblies. Radiographics 23 1 (2003) 255-265
34. Abe H., Ashizawa K., Li F., et al. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) for differential diagnosis of interstitial lung disease: results of a simulation test with actual clinical cases. Acad Radiol 11 1 (2004) 29-37
35. Shiraishi J., Abe H., Engelmann R., Aoyama M., MacMahon H., and Doi K. Computer-aided diagnosis for distinction between benign and malignant solitary pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs: ROC analysis of radiologists' performance. Radiology 227 (2003) 469-474
36. Malich A., Fischer D.R., and Bottcher J. CAD for mammography: the technique, results, current role and further developments. Eur Radiol 16 (2006) 1449-1460
37. Karssemeijer N. Detection of masses in mammograms. In: Strickland R.N. (Ed). Image-processing techniques in tumor detection (2002), Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, NY 187-212
38. Nishikawa R.M. Detection of microcalcifications. In: Strickland R.N. (Ed). Image-processing techniques in tumor detection (2002), Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, NY 131-153
39. Giger M.L., Huo Z., Kupinski M.A., and Vyborny C.J. Computer-aided diagnosis in mammography. In: Sonka M., and Fitzpatrick J.M. (Eds). Handbook of medical imaging vol. 2 (2000), The Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, Bellingham, WA 915-1004
40. Sampat M.P., Markey M.K., and Bovik A.C. Computer-aided detection and diagnosis in mammography. In: Bovik A.C. (Ed). The handbook of image and video processing. 2nd ed. (2005), Elsevier, New York 1195-1217
41. Nishikawa R.M. Computer-assisted detection and diagnosis (2005), Wiley
42. Chan H.-P., Niklason L.T., Ikeda D.M., Lam K.L., and Adler D.D. Digitization requirements in mammography: effects on computer-aided detection of microcalcifications. Med Phys 21 7 (1994) 1203-1211
43. Stafford R.G., Beutel J., and Mickewich D.J. Application of neural networks to computer-aided pathology detection in mammography. Proc SPIE (1993) 1898
44. El-Naqa I., Yang Y., Wernick M.N., Galatsanos N.P., and Nishikawa R.M. A support vector machine approach for detection of microcalcifications. IEEE Trans Med Imag 21 12 (2002) 1552-1563
45. Campanini R., Dongiovanni D., Iampieri E., et al. A novel featureless approach to mass detection in digital mammograms based on support vector machines. Phys Med Biol 49 6 (2004) 961-975
46. Veldkamp W.J.H., and Karssemeijer N. Improved correction for signal dependent noise applied to automatic detection of microcalcifications. In: Karssemeijer N., Thijssen M., Hendriks J., and van Erning L. (Eds). Digital mammography nijmegen 98 (1998), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam 160-176
47. Chan H.P., Doi K., Galhotra S., Vyborny C.J., MacMahon H., and Jokich P.M. Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography I. Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammography. Med Phys 14 4 (1987) 538-548
48. Nagel R.H., Nishikawa R.M., and Doi K. Analysis of methods for reducing false positives in the automated detection of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms. Med Phys 25 8 (1998) 1502-1506
49. Davies D.H., and Dance D.R. Automatic computer detection of clustered calcifications in digital mammograms. Phys Med Biol 35 (1990) 1111-1118
50. Cheng H.-D., Lui Y.M., and Freimanis R.I. A novel approach to microcalcification detection using fuzzy logic technology. IEEE Trans Med Imag 17 3 (1998) 442-450
51. Cernadas E., Zwiggelaar R., Veldkamp W., et al. Detection of mammographic microclcifications using a statistical model. In: Karssemeijer N., Thijssen M., Hendriks J., and van Erning L. (Eds). Digital mammography (1998), Kuwester, Amsterdam 205-208
52. Brown S., Li R., Brandt L., Wilson L., Kossoff G., and Kossoff M. Development of a multi-feature CAD system for mammography. In: Karssemeijer N., Thijssen M., Hendriks J., and van Erning L. (Eds). Digital mammography (1998), Kuwester, Amsterdam 189-196
53. Bankman I.N., Christens-Barry W.A., Kim D.W., Weinberg I.N., Gatewood O.B., and Brody W.R. Automated recognition of microcalcification clusters in mammograms. Proc SPIE 1905 (1993) 731-738
54. Anastasio M.A., Yoshida H., Nagel R., Nishikawa R.M., and Doi K. A genetic algorithm-based method for optimizing the performance of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms. Med Phys 25 9 (1998) 1613-1620
55. Anastasio M.A., Kupinski M.A., and Nishikawa R.M. Optimization and FROC analysis of rule-based detection schemes using a multiobjective approach. IEEE Trans Med Imag 17 6 (1998) 1089-1093
56. Nishikawa R., Edwards A., Schmidt R., Papaioannou J., and Linver M. Can radiologists recognize that a computer has identified cancers that they have overlooked?. Proc SPIE 6146 (2006) 1-8
57. Chakraborty D.P., and Berbaum K.S. Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation. Med Phys 31 8 (2004) 2313-2330
58. Efron B., and Tibshirani R. Improvements on cross-validation: the .632+ bootstrap method. J Am Stat Assoc 92 438 (1997) 548-560
59. Taylor P., Champness J., Given-Wilson R., Johnston K., and Potts H. Impact of computer-aided detection prompts on the sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography. Health Technol Assess 9 6 (2005) 1-70
60. Gilbert F.J., Astley S.M., McGee M.A., et al. Single reading with computer-aided detection and double reading of screening mammograms in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Program. Radiology 241 1 (2006) 47-53
61. Kegelmeyer Jr. W.P., Pruneda J.M., Bourland P.D., Hillis A., Riggs M.W., and Nipper M.L. Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. Radiology 191 2 (1994) 331-337
62. Astley S., Quarterman C., Al Nuaimi Y., et al. Computer-aided detection in screening mammography: the impact of training on reader performance. In: Pisano E. (Ed). Digital mammography 2004 (2004), Chapel Hill
63. Anderson E.D., Muir B.B., Walsh J.S., and Kirkpatrick A.E. The efficacy of double reading mammograms in breast screening. Clin Radiol 49 4 (1994) 248-251
64. Harvey S.C., Geller B., Oppenheimer R.G., Pinet M., Riddell L., and Garra B. Increase in cancer detection and recall rates with independent double interpretation of screening mammography. Am J Roentgenol 180 5 (2003) 1461-1467
65. Thurfjell E.L., Lernevall K.A., and Taube A.A. Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology 191 1 (1994) 241-244
66. Freer T.W., and Ulissey M.J. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 220 3 (2001) 781-786
67. Gur D., Sumkin J.H., Rockette H.E., et al. Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst 96 3 (2004) 185-190
68. Feig S.A., Sickles E.A., Evans W.P., and Linver M.N. Re: changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst 96 16 (2004) 1260-1261 author reply 1261
69. Nishikawa R.M. Modeling the effect of computer-aided detection on the sensitivity of screening mammography. In: Astley S.M. (Ed). Digital mammography 2006 (2006), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 136-142
70. Cupples T.E., Cunningham J.E., and Reynolds J.C. Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185 4 (2005) 944-950
71. van Engeland S., Varela C., Timp S., Snoeren P.R., and Karssemeijer N. Using context for mass detection and classification in mammograms. Proc SPIE 5749 (2006) 94-102
72. Paquerault S., Petrick N., Chan H.P., Sahiner B., and Helvie M.A. Improvement of computerized mass detection on mammograms: fusion of two-view information. Med Phys 29 2 (2002) 238-247
73. Birdwell R.L., Bandodkar P., and Ikeda D.M. Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting. Radiology 236 (2005) 451-457
74. Helvie M.A., Hadjiiski L., Makariou E., et al. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial. Radiology 231 1 (2004) 208-214
75. Khoo L.A., Taylor P., and Given-Wilson R.M. Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study. Radiology 237 2 (2005) 444-449