Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: Prospective study of 104 cancers

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 187, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 20-28

  Dean, Judy C ^a,b   Ilvento, Christina C ^b  

^a ICAD INC   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Breast; Breast cancer; Mammography; Screening

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DUCTAL CARCINOMA IN SITU; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER INVASION; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TUMOR VOLUME; BIOPSY; BREAST TUMOR; FEMALE; MIDDLE AGED; PALPATION; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RADIOGRAPHY;

BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PALPATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 33747130105     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.0111     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Thurfjell EL, Lernevall KA, Taube AA. Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology 1994; 191:241-244
2. Hendee WR, Beam C, Hendrick E. Proposition: all mammograms should be double-read. Med Phys 1999; 26:115-118
3. Kopans DB. Double reading. Radiol Clin North Am 2000; 38:719-724
4. Ciatto S, Rosselli Del Turco M, Risso G, et al. Comparison of standard reading and computer aided detection (CAD) on a national proficiency test of screening mammography. Eur J of Radiol 2003; 45:135-138
5. Brem RF, Baum J, Lechner M, et al. Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial. AJR 2003; 181:687-693
6. Sallam MY, Nelson MT, Woods KS. Understanding computer-aided detection for mammography. Semin in Breast Dis 2003; 6:78-88
7. Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood SA, D'Orsi CJ, et al. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 2001; 215:554-562
8. Butler SA, Gabbay RJ, Kass DA, Siedler DE, O'Shaughnessy KF, Castellino RA. Computer-aided detection in diagnostic mammography: detection of clinically unsuspected cancers. AJR 2004; 183:1511-1515
9. Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology 2001; 219:192-202
10. Malich A, Sauner D, Marx C, et al. Influence of breast lesion size and histologic findings on tumor detection rate of a computer-aided detection system. Radiology 2003; 228:851-856
11. Evans WP, Warren Burhenne LJ, Laurie L, O'Shaughnessy KF, Castellino RA. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammography characteristics and computer-aided detection. Radiology 2002; 225:182-189
12. Sacks WM. Estimating the effect of computer-aided detection on the sensitivity of screening mammography. (letter) Radiology 2003; 226:597-599
13. Freer TW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001; 220:781-786
14. Gur D, Sumkin JH, Rockette HE, et al. Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96:185-190
15. Morton MJ, Whaley DH, Brandt KR, Amrami KK. Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer-aided detection - prospective evaluation. Radiology 2006; 239:204-212
16. Birdwell RL, Bandokar P, Ikeda DM. Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting. Radiology 2005;236:451-457
17. Cupples TE, Cunningham JE, Reynolds JC. Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program. AJR 2005;185:944-950
18. Feig SA, Sickles EA, Evans WP, Linver MN. Re: Changes in breast cancer detection and mammogram recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. (letter) J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96:1260-1261
19. Ikeda DM, Birdwell RL, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA, Brenner RJ. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography. Radiology 2004; 230:811-819
20. Sickles EA, Wolverton DE, Dee KE. Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists. Radiology 2002; 224:861-869