Processed images in human perception: A case study in ultrasound breast imaging

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 682-687

  Yap, Moi Hoon ^a   Edirisinghe, Eran ^a   Bez, Helmut ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Computer Aided Diagnosis; Human perception; Receiver Operating Curve; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; BREAST CANCER DETECTION; BREAST IMAGING; COGNITIVE TASK; EARLY DETECTION OF BREAST CANCER; HUMAN PERCEPTION; HUMAN PERFORMANCE; IMAGE PAIRS; LARGE DATABASE; MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS; ORIGINAL IMAGES; PROCESSED IMAGES; RANDOM SELECTION; RANDOM TESTS; RECEIVER OPERATING CURVES; RESEARCH EFFORTS; SOFTWARE TOOL; TRAINING TOOLS; ULTRASOUND IMAGES;

COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS; COMPUTER CRIME; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; FACE RECOGNITION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; SURVEYS; ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS; ULTRASONIC TRANSMISSION; ULTRASONICS;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS;

ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; QUESTIONNAIRES; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77949653127     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Chen D.R., Chang R.F., and Huang Y.L. Breast cancer diagnosis using self-organizing map for sonography. Ultrasound Med Biol 26 3 (2000) 405-411
2. Cancer Research UK-Breast Cancer. http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/breast/ (accessed on January 30, 2008).
3. Kallergi M. Computer-aided diagnosis of mammographic microcalcification clusters. Med Phys 31 (2004) 314-326
4. Gale A.G. PERFORMS-a self-asssessment scheme for radiologists in breast screening. Seminars in Breast Disease: Improving and Monitoring Mammographic Interpretative Skills 6 (2003) 148-152
5. National Health Service Breast Screening Programme. http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/breastscreen/index.html (accessed on January 15, 2008).
6. Crowley R.S., and Medvedeva O. A general architecture for intelligent tutoring of diagnostic classification problem solving. AMIA Annu Symp Proc (2003) 185-189
7. Azevedo R., and Lajoie S.P. The cognitive basis for the design of a mammography interpretation tutor. Int J Artif Intell Educ 9 (1998) 32-44
8. Crowley R.S., and Medvedeva O. An intelligent tutoring system for visual classification problem solving. Artif Intell Med 36 (2006) 85-117
9. Imaginis-General Information on Mammography. http://www.imaginis.com/breasthealth/mammography.asp (accessed on December 15, 2007).
10. Cowley HC. Assessment and training in breast cancer detection, PhD thesis, AVRC, ESRI, Loughborough University; 1999.
11. Venta L.A., Dudiak C.M., Salomon C.G., and Flisak M.E. Sonographic evaluation of the breast. RadioGraphics 14 (1994) 29-50
12. Yap M.H., Edirisinghe E.A., and Bez H.E. Fully automatic lesion boundary detection in ultrasound breast images, 651265123I (2007), SPIE Medical Imaging, San Diego
13. Prapavesis ST, Fornage BD, Weismann CF, Palko A, Zoumpoulis P. Breast ultrasound and US-guided interventional techniques-a multimedia teaching file, 1st ed., Thessaloniki Greece; 2001.
14. Market Research Society (MRS). Questionnaire design guidelines, May 2006.
15. Yap MH, Edirisinghe EA, Bez HE. Object boundary detection in ultrasound breast images, Third Canadian Robotics and Machine Vision Conference (CRV 2006).
16. Sample Questionnaires. http://www-staff.lboro.ac.uk/∼ehmhy/samples.html (accessed on January 31, 2008).
17. Moller S. Assessment and prediction of speech quality in telecommunication, chapter 3 (2000), Springer ISBN 0792378946
18. Metz C.E., Herman B.A., and Roe C.A. Statistical comparison of two ROC curve estimates obtained from partially-paired datasets. Med Decis Making 18 (1998) 110-121
19. Carsten S., Sebastian W., Tania S., and Klaus J. Comparison of eight computer programs for receiver-operating characteristic analysis. Clin Chem 49 3 (2003) 433-439