Performance of Breast Ultrasound Computer-aided Diagnosis. Dependence on Image Selection

Academic Radiology

Volumn 15, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1234-1245

  Gruszauskas, Nicholas P ^a,b   Drukker, Karen ^a   Giger, Maryellen L ^a   Sennett, Charlene A ^a   Pesce, Lorenzo L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b University of Illinois at Chicago

Author keywords

breast cancer; Breast ultrasound; computer aided diagnosis (CAD)

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 51249097492     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.04.016     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Edwards B.K., Brown M.L., Wingo P.A., et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 97 (2005) 1407-1427
2. Elmore J.G., Armstrong K., Lehman C.D., and Fletcher S.W. Screening for breast cancer. JAMA 293 (2005) 1245-1256
3. Fine R.E., and Staren E.D. Updates in breast ultrasound. Surg Clin North Am 84 (2004) 1001-1034
4. Kolb T.M. Breast US for screening, diagnosing, and staging breast cancer: Issues and controversies; RSNA Categorical Course in Diagnostic Radiology Physics: Advances in Breast Imaging-Physics, Technology, and Clinical Applications 2004 (2004), Radiologic Society of North America, Chicago, IL ; 247-257
5. Berg W.A., Gutierrez L., NessAiver M.S., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233 (2004) 830-849
6. Berg W.A., Blume J.D., Cormack J.B., Mendelson E.B., Madsen E.L., and ACRIN 6666 Investigators. Lesion detection and characterization in a breast US phantom: Results of the ACRIN 6666 investigators. Radiology 239 (2006) 693-702
7. Jackson V.P. The role of US in breast imaging. Radiology 177 (1990) 305-311
8. Sickles E.A. Breast imaging: From 1965 to the present. Radiology 215 (2000) 1-16
9. Weinstein S.P., Conant E.F., and Sehgal C. Technical advances in breast ultrasound imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 27 (2006) 273-283
10. Horsch K., Giger M.L., Venta L.A., and Vyborny C.J. Computerized diagnosis of breast lesions on ultrasound. Med Phys 29 (2002) 157-164
11. Horsch K., Giger M.L., Vyborny C.J., and Venta L.A. Performance of computer-aided diagnosis in the interpretation of lesions on breast sonography. Acad Radiol 11 (2004) 272-280
12. Horsch K., Giger M.L., Vyborny C.J., Lan L., Mendelson E.B., and Hendrick R.E. Classification of breast lesions with multimodality computer-aided diagnosis: Observer study results on an independent clinical data set. Radiology 240 (2006) 357-368
13. Horsch K., Giger M.L., Venta L.A., and Vyborny C.J. Automatic segmentation of breast lesions on ultrasound. Med Phys 28 (2001) 1652-1659
14. Madjar H., and Jellins J. The Practice of Breast Ultrasound: Techniques, Findings, Differential Diagnosis (2000), Thieme, Stuttgart/New York
15. Kupinski M.A., Edwards D.C., Giger M.L., and Metz C.E. Ideal observer approximation using Bayesian classification neural networks. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20 (2001) 886-899
16. Metz C.E. Fundamental ROC analysis. In: Beutel J., Kundel H.J., and Van Metter R.L. (Eds). Handbook of Medical Imaging, Volume 1: Physics and Psychophysics (2000), SPIE Press, Bellingham, WA 751-764
17. Obuchowski N.A. Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology. Radiology 229 (2003) 3-8
18. Pesce L.L., and Metz C.E. Proproc v2.2.0. Department of Radiology, University of Chicago. http://xray.bsd.uchicago.edu/krl/roc_soft.htm Updated February 27, 2007. Accessed July 1, 2007
19. Pesce L.L., and Metz C.E. Reliable and computationally efficient maximum-likelihood estimation of "proper" binormal ROC curves. Acad Radiol 14 (2007) 814-829
20. Pepe M.S. The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction (2004), Oxford University Press, New York
21. Mossman D. Resampling techniques in the analysis of non-binormal ROC data. Med Decis Making 15 (1995) 358-366
22. Glantz S.A. Primer of Biostatistics. 6th ed (2005), McGraw-Hill, New York :219-251
23. Pocock S.J. The pros and cons of noninferiority trials. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 17 (2003) 483-490
24. Piaggio G., Elbourne D.R., Altman D.G., Pocock S.J., and Evans S.J.W. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: An extension of the CONSORT statement. JAMA 295 (2006) 1152-1160
25. Jenkins R., and Burton A.M. 100% accuracy in automatic face recognition. Science 319 (2008) 435
26. Huo Z., Giger M.L., and Vyborny C.J. Computerized analysis of multiple-mammographic views: Potential usefulness of special view mammograms in computer-aided diagnosis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20 (2001) 1285-1292
27. Liu B., Metz C.E., and Jiang Y. Effect of correlation on combining diagnostic information from two images of the same patient. Med Phys 32 (2005) 3329-3338
28. Metz C.E., and Pan X. "Proper" binormal ROC curves: Theory and maximum-likelihood estimation. J Math Psychol 43 (1999) 1-33