Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 185, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 944-950

  Cupples, Tommy E ^a   Cunningham, Joan E ^b,c   Reynolds, James C ^a  

^a Palmetto Richland Memorial Hospital   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c South Carolina Comprehensive Breast Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER INVASION; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SIZE; CANCER STAGING; CARCINOMA IN SITU; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RADIOLOGIST; RECALL; REVIEW; TASK PERFORMANCE; TUMOR BIOPSY; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; FEMALE; INCIDENCE; INSTRUMENTATION; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 32944481413     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.04.1300     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen HC, Yen MF, Duffy SW, Smith RA. Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 2001; 91:1724-1731
2. Duffy SW, Tabar L, Chen H, et al. The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties. Cancer 2002; 95:458-469
3. Vyborny CJ. Can computers help radiologists read mammograms? Radiology 1994; 191:315-317
4. te Brake GM, Karssemeijer N, Hendricks JH. Automated detection of breast carcinomas not detected in a screening program. Radiology 1998; 207:465-471
5. Nishikawa RW, Doi K, Geiger ML, et al. Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications: evaluation of performance on mammograms from multiple centers. RadioGraphics 1995; 15:445-452
6. Kregelmeyer WP, Pruneda JM, Bourland PD, Hillis A, Riggs MW, Nipper ML. Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. Radiology 1994; 191:331-337
7. Warren Burhenne LJ, D' Orsi CJ, Feig SA, et al. The potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 2000; 215:554-562
8. Freer TW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001; 220:781-786
9. Bandodkar P, Birdwell R, Ikeda D. Computer aided detection (CAD) with screening mammography in an academic institution: preliminary findings, (abstr) Radiology 2002; 225(P):458
10. Motion MJ, Whaley DH, Brandt KR, Amrami KK. The effects of computer-aided detection (CAD) on a local/regional screening mammography program: prospective evaluation of 12,646 patients, (abstr) Radiology 2002; 225(P):459
11. Gur D, Sumkin JH, Rockette HE, et al. Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96:185-190
12. Quality standards and certification requirements for mammography facilities, 58 Federal Register 67565 (1993)
13. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 2nd ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 1998
14. American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1997
15. Feig S, Sickles E, Evans WP, Linver M. Re: changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after introduction of a computer-aided detection system, (letter) J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96:1260-1261
16. Feig SA. Age-related accuracy of screening mammography: how should it be measured? Radiology 2000; 214:633-640
17. Butler WM, Cunningham JE, Bull D, et al. Breast cancer care: changing community standards. J Healthc Qual 2004; 26:22-28