Breast Ultrasound Computer-Aided Diagnosis Using BI-RADS Features

Academic Radiology

Volumn 14, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 928-939

  Shen, Wei Chih ^a   Chang, Ruey Feng ^a,b   Moon, Woo Kyung ^c   Chou, Yi Hong ^d   Huang, Chiun Sheng ^e  

^a NATIONAL CHUNG CHENG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^d TAIPEI VETERANS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^e NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

BI RADS; binary logistic regression model; Breast cancer; computer aided diagnosis (CAD) system; ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STUDENT T TEST;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 34447297286     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.04.016     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E., et al. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin 56 (2006) 106-130
2. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2006 (2006), American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
3. American Cancer Society. Cancer Prevention & Early Detection Facts & Figsures 2006 (2006), American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
4. Baker J.A., and Soo M.S. Breast US: Assessment of technical quality and image interpretation. Radiology 223 (2002) 229-238
5. Rizzatto G.J. Towards a more sophisticated use of breast ultrasound. Eur Radiol 11 (2001) 2425-2435
6. Williams J.C. US of solid breast nodules. Radiology 198 (1996) 585
7. Stavros A.t., Thickman D., Rapp C.L., et al. Solid breast nodules: Use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 196 (1995) 123-134
8. Liang S., Rangayyan R.M., and Desautels J.E.L. Application of shape analysis to mammographic calcifications. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 13 (1994) 263-274
9. Chang R.F., Wu W.J., Moon W.K., et al. Automatic ultrasound segmentation and morphology based diagnosis of solid breast tumors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 89 (2005) 179-185
10. Madabhushi A., and Metaxas D.N. Combining low-, high-level and empirical domain knowledge for automated segmentation of ultrasonic breast lesions. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22 (2003) 155-169
11. Kim K.G., Cho S.W., Min S.J., et al. Computerized scheme for assessing ultrasonographic features of breast masses. Acad Radiol 12 (2005) 58-66
12. Joo S., Yang Y.S., Moon W.K., et al. Computer-aided diagnosis of solid breast nodules: Use of an artificial neural network based on multiple sonographic features. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 23 (2004) 1292-1300
13. Chen C.M., Chou Y.H., Han K.C., et al. Breast lesions on sonograms: Computer-aided diagnosis with nearly setting-independent features and artificial neural networks. Radiology 226 (2003) 504-514
14. Drukker K., Giger M.L., Vyborny C.J., et al. Computerized detection and classification of cancer on breast ultrasound. Acad Radiol 11 (2004) 526-535
15. Chang R.F., Wu W.J., Moon W.K., et al. Support vector machines for diagnosis of breast tumors on US images. Acad Radiol 10 (2003) 189-197
16. Chen D.R., Chang R.F., and Huang Y.L. Computer-aided diagnosis applied to US of solid breast nodules by using neural networks. Radiology 213 (1999) 407-412
17. Chang R.F., Wu W.J., Moon W.K., et al. Improvement in breast tumor discrimination by support vector machines and speckle-emphasis texture analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 29 (2003) 679-686
18. Chen D.R., Chang R.F., Huang Y.L., et al. Texture analysis of breast tumors on sonograms. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 21 (2000) 308-316
19. Bader W., Bohmer S., van L.P., et al. Does texture analysis improve breast ultrasound precision?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 15 (2000) 311-316
20. Kim K.G., Kim J.H., and Min B.G. Classification of malignant and benign tumors using boundary characteristics in breast ultrasonograms. J Digit Imaging 15 suppl 1 (2002) 224-227
21. Sehgal C.M., Cary T.W., Kangas S.A., Weinstein S.P., Schultz S.M., Arger P.H., and Conant E.F. Computer-based margin analysis of breast sonography for differentiating malignant and benign masses. J Ultrasound Med 23 9 (2004) 1201-1209
22. Horsch K., Giger M.L., Venta L.A., and Vyborny C.J. Computerized diagnosis of breast lesions on ultrasound. Med Phys 29 2 (2002) 157-164
23. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. 4th ed. (2003), American College of Radiology
24. Costantini M., Belli P., Lombardi R., et al. Characterization of solid breast masses: Use of the sonographic breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon. J Ultrasound Med 25 5 (2006) 649-659
25. Baker J.A., Kornguth P.J., Lo J.Y., Williford M.E., and Floyd Jr. C.E. Breast cancer: prediction with artificial neural network based on BI-RADS standardized lexicon. Radiology 196 (1995) 817-822
26. Lo J.Y., Baker J.A., Kornguth P.J., Iglehart J.D., and Floyd Jr. C.E. Predicting breast cancer invasion with artificial neural networks on the basis of mammographic features. Radiology 203 (1997) 159-163
27. Baker J.A., Kornguth P.J., Lo J.Y., and Floyd Jr. C.E. Artificial neural network: improving the quality of breast biopsy recommendations. Radiology 198 (1996) 131-135
28. Markey M.K., Lo J.Y., and Floyd Jr. C.E. Differences between computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses and that of calcifications. Radiology 223 (2002) 489-493
29. Bilska-Wolak A.O., Floyd Jr. C.E., Lo J.Y., and Baker J.A. Computer aid for decision to biopsy breast masses on mammography: Validation on new cases. Acad Radiol 12 (2005) 671-680
30. Hosmer D.W., and Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd ed. (2000), Wiley, New York
31. Jain A.K. Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing (1989), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
32. Davis J.A. Elementary survey analysis (1971), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
33. Stone M. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictors. J R Stat Soc B 36 (1974) 111-147