Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: An ROC study

Radiology

Volumn 212, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 817-827

  Chan, Heang Ping ^a   Sahiner, Berkman ^a   Helvie, Mark A ^a   Petrick, Nicholas ^a   Roubidoux, Marilyn A ^a   Wilson, Todd E ^a   Adler, Dorit D ^a   Paramagul, Chintana ^a   Newman, Joel S ^a   Sanjay Gopai, Sethumadavan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HOSPITALS   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms; Breast neoplasms, radiography; Breast radiography; Computers, diagnostic aid; Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC)

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; TUMOR CLASSIFICATION;

EID: 0032872797     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.212.3.r99au47817     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics 1998. CA Cancer J Clin 1998; 48:6-29.
2. Adler DD, Helvie MA. Mammographic biopsy recommendations. Curr Opin Radiol 1992; 4:123-129.
3. Kopans DB. The positive predictive value of mammography. AJR 1991; 158:521-526.
4. Shtern F. Digital mammography and related technologies: a perspective from the National Cancer Institute. Radiology 1992; 183: 629-630.
5. Thurfjell EL, Lernevall KA, Taube AAS. Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology 1994; 191:241-244.
6. Vyborny CJ. Can computers help radiologists read mammograms? Radiology 1994; 191:315-317.
7. Chan HP, Doi K, Vyborny CJ, et al. Improvement in radiologists' detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: the potential of computer-aided diagnosis. Invest Radiol 1990; 25:1102-1110.
8. Kegelmeyer WP, Pruneda JM, Bourland PD, Hillis A, Riggs MW, Nipper ML. Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. Radiology 1994; 191: 331-337.
9. Getty DJ, Pickett RM, D'Orsi CJ, Swets JA. Enhanced interpretation of diagnostic images. Invest Radiol 1988; 23:240-252.
10. D'Orsi CJ, Getty DJ, Swets JA, Pickett RM, Seltzer SE, McNeil BJ. Reading and decision aids for improved accuracy and standardization of mammographic diagnosis. Radiology 1992; 184:619-622.
11. Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Lo JY, Floyd CE. Artificial neural network: improving the quality of breast biopsy recommendations. Radiology 1996; 198:131-135.
12. Chan HP, Sahiner B, Petrick N, et al. Observer performance study of radiologists' reading of mammographic masses and comparison with computerized classification (abstr). Radiology 1996; 201(P):370.
13. Chan HP, Sahiner B, Helvie MA, et al. Effects of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) on radiologists' classification of malignant and benign masses on mammograms: an ROC study (abstr). Radiology 1997; 205(P):275.
14. Jiang Y, Nishikawa R, Schmidt RA, Metz CE, Doi K, Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis (CAD): an observer study (abstr). Radiology 1997; 205(P):274.
15. Sahiner B, Chan HP, Petrick N, Helvie MA, Adler DD, Goodsitt MM. Classification of masses on mammograms using rubberband straightening transform and feature analysis. Proc SPIE 1996; 2710:44-50.
16. Sahiner B, Chan HP, Petrick N, Helvie MA, Goodsitt MM. Computerized characterization of masses on mammograms: the rubber-band straightening transform and texture analysis, Med Phys 1998; 25:516-526.
17. Sahiner B, Chan HP, Petrick N, Helvie MA, Goodsitt MM. Design of a high-sensitivity classifier based on a genetic algorithm: application to computer-aided diagnosis. Phys Med Biol 1998; 43:2853-2871.
18. Ackerman LV, Gose EE. Breast lesion classification by computer and xeroradiograph. Cancer 1972; 30:1025-1035.
19. Kilday J, Palmieri F, Fox MD. Classifying mammographic lesions using computerized image analysis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1993; 12:664-669.
20. Pohlman S, Powell KA, Obuchowshi NA, Chilote WA, Grundfest-Broniatowski S. Quantitative classification of breast tumors in digitized mammograms. Med Phys 1996; 23:1337-1345.
21. Huo Z, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Wolverton DE, Schmidt RA, Doi K. Automated computerized classification of malignant and benign masses on digitized mammograms. Acad Radiol 1998; 5:155-168.
22. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I. Texture features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernetics 1973; 3:610-621.
23. Norusis MJ. SPSS for Windows release 6: professional statistics. Chicago, Ill: Statistical Product for Service Solutions, 1993.
24. Lachenbruch PA. Discriminant analysis. New York, NY: Hafner, 1975; 8-19.
25. Metz CE. ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Invest Radiol 1986; 21:720-733.
26. Metz CE, Herman BA, Shen JH. Maximum-likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously distributed data. Stat Med 1998; 17:1033-1053.
27. Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 1989; 24:234-245.
28. Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE. ROC rating analysis: generalization to the population of readers and cases with the jack-knife method. Invest Radiol 1992; 27:723-731.
29. Fukunaga K, Hayes RR. Effects of sample size on classifier design. IEEE Trans Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1989; 11:873-885.
30. Chan HP, Sahiner B, Wagner RF, Petrick N, Mossoba J. Effects of sample size on classifier design: quadratic and neural network classifiers. Proc SPIE 1997; 3034:1102-1113.
31. Chan HP, Sahiner B, Wagner RF, Petrick N. Classifier design for computer-aided diagnosis in mammography: effects of finite sample size. Med Phys 1997; 24:1034-1035.