Comparison of independent double readings and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for the diagnosis of breast calcifications

Academic Radiology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 84-94

  Jiang, Yulei ^a   Metz, Charles E ^a   Nishikawa, Robert M ^a   Schmidt, Robert A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasm; Breast radiography; Calcification; Computer; Diagnosis; Diagnostic aid; Diagnostic radiology; Observer performance; Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CALCIFICATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RADIOLOGIST; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIMULATION;

BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALCINOSIS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAMMOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 29944438579     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.09.086     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. J. Yerushalmy, J. Harkness, J. Cope, B. Kennedy The role of dual reading in mass radiography Am Rev Tuberc 61 1950 443 464
2. B.J. Hillman, S.J. Hessel, R.G. Swensson, P.G. Herman Improving diagnostic accuracy a comparison of interactive and Delphi consultations Invest Radiol 12 1977 112 115
3. S.J. Hessel, P.G. Herman, R.G. Swensson Improving performance by multiple interpretations of chest radiographs effectiveness and cost Radiology 127 1978 589 594
4. R.E. Bird, T.W. Wallace, B.C. Yankaskas Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography Radiology 184 1992 613 617
5. E.L. Thurfjell, K.A. Lernevall, A.A. Taube Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program Radiology 191 1994 241 244
6. R.M. Warren, S.W. Duffy Comparison of single reading with double reading of mammograms, and change in effectiveness with experience Br J Radiol 68 1995 958 962
7. J. Brown, S. Bryan, R. Warren Mammography screening an incremental cost effectiveness analysis of double versus single reading of mammograms BMJ 312 1996 809 812
8. R.G. Blanks, M.G. Wallis, R.M. Given-Wilson Observer variability in cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening in a study of two versus one view mammography J Med Screen 6 1999 152 158
9. D.J. Getty, R.M. Pickett, C.J. D'Orsi, J.A. Swets Enhanced interpretation of diagnostic images Invest Radiol 23 1988 240 252
10. H.P. Chan, K. Doi, C.J. Vyborny Improvement in radiologists' detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. The potential of computer-aided diagnosis Invest Radiol 25 1990 1102 1110
11. W.P. Kegelmeyer Jr, J.M. Pruneda, P.D. Bourland, A. Hillis, M.W. Riggs, M.L. Nipper Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions Radiology 191 1994 331 337
12. Y. Jiang, R.M. Nishikawa, R.A. Schmidt, C.E. Metz, M.L. Giger, K. Doi Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis Acad Radiol 6 1999 22 33
13. H.P. Chan, B. Sahiner, M.A. Helvie Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis an ROC study Radiology 212 1999 817 827
14. Z. Huo, M.L. Giger, C.J. Vyborny, C.E. Metz Breast cancer effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis observer study with independent database of mammograms Radiology 224 2002 560 568
15. T. Kobayashi, X.W. Xu, H. MacMahon, C.E. Metz, K. Doi Effect of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme on radiologists' performance in detection of lung nodules on radiographs Radiology 199 1996 843 848
16. M.C. Difazio, H. MacMahon, X.W. Xu Digital chest radiography effect of temporal subtraction images on detection accuracy Radiology 202 1997 447 452
17. L. Monnier-Cholley, H. MacMahon, S. Katsuragawa, J. Morishita, T. Ishida, K. Doi Computer-aided diagnosis for detection of interstitial opacities on chest radiographs AJR Am J Roentgenol 171 1998 1651 1656
18. K. Ashizawa, H. MacMahon, T. Ishida Effect of an artificial neural network on radiologists' performance in the differential diagnosis of interstitial lung disease using chest radiographs AJR Am J Roentgenol 172 1999 1311 1315
19. Y. Jiang, R.M. Nishikawa, D.E. Wolverton Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications automated feature analysis and classification Radiology 198 1996 671 678
20. E.A. Sickles Breast calcifications mammographic evaluation Radiology 160 1986 289 293
21. C.E. Metz Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies Invest Radiol 24 1989 234 245
22. J.A. Swets, R.M. Pickett Evaluation of Diagnostic Systems Methods From Signal Detection Theory 1982 Academic New York
23. C.E. Metz ROC methodology in radiologic imaging Invest Radiol 21 1986 720 733
24. J.A. Swets Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems Science 240 1988 1285 1293
25. H.E. Rockette, D. Gur, C.E. Metz The use of continuous and discrete confidence judgments in receiver operating characteristic studies of diagnostic imaging techniques Invest Radiol 27 1992 169 172
26. R.F. Wagner, S.V. Beiden, C.E. Metz Continuous versus categorical data for ROC analysis some quantitative considerations Acad Radiol 8 2001 328 334
27. C.E. Metz, B.A. Herman, J.H. Shen Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data Stat Med 17 1998 1033 1053
28. C.E. Metz, J.H. Shen Gains in accuracy from replicated readings of diagnostic images prediction and assessment in terms of ROC analysis Med Decis Making 12 1992 60 75
29. D.D. Dorfman, K.S. Berbaum, C.E. Metz Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method Invest Radiol 27 1992 723 731
30. Y. Jiang, R.M. Nishikawa, R.A. Schmidt, A.Y. Toledano, K. Doi Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications Radiology 220 2001 787 794
31. C.A. Beam, D.C. Sullivan What are the issues in the double reading of mammograms? Radiology 193 1994 582
32. S.H. Taplin, C.M. Rutter, J.G. Elmore, D. Seger, D. White, R.J. Brenner Accuracy of screening mammography using single versus independent double interpretation AJR Am J Roentgenol 174 2000 1257 1262
33. C.A. Beam, D.C. Sullivan, P.M. Layde Effect of human variability on independent double reading in screening mammography Acad Radiol 3 1996 891 897
34. C. Beam, E. Conant, E. Sickles, C. Guse The value of consensus reading in screening mammography Radiology 213 P 1999 239 240
35. R.A. Schmidt, G.M. Newstead, M.N. Linver Mammographic screening sensitivity of general radiologists N. Karssemeijer M. Thijssen J. Hendriks L. van Erning Digital Mammography 1998 Kluwer Dordrecht 383 388
36. Y. Jiang, R.S. Rana, R.A. Schmidt Computer classification of malignant and benign calcifications in full-field digital mammograms P. Pisano Digital Mammography 2004 Kluwer Dordrecht (in press)
37. C.E. Metz, P.-L. Wang, H.B. Kronman A new approach for testing the significance of differences between ROC curves measured from correlated data F. Deconinck Information Processing in Medical Imaging 1984 Nijhoff The Hague 432 445