Breast US computer-aided diagnosis workstation: Performance with a large clinical diagnostic population

Radiology

Volumn 248, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 392-397

  Drukker, Karen ^a   Gruszauskas, Nicholas P ^a   Sennett, Charlene A ^a   Giger, Maryellen L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER PATIENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR DIFFERENTIATION; ULTRASOUND; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; BIOPSY; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; ROC CURVE;

AREA UNDER CURVE; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 49049083896     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2482071778     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Horsch K, Giger ML, Venta LA, Vyborny CJ. Automatic segmentation of breast lesions on ultrasound. Med Phys 2001;28:1652-1659.
2. Horsch K, Giger ML, Venta LA, Vyborny CJ. Computerized diagnosis of breast lesions on ultrasound. Med Phys 2002;29:157-164.
3. Drukker K, Giger ML, Horsch K, Kupinski MA, Vyborny CJ, Mendelson EB. Computerized lesion detection on breast ultrasound. Med Phys 2002;29:1438-1446.
4. Drukker K, Giger ML, Mendelson EB. Computerized analysis of shadowing on breast ultrasound for improved lesion detection. Med Phys 2003;30:1833-1842.
5. Drukker K, Giger ML, Metz CE. Robustness of computerized lesion detection and classification scheme across different breast US platforms. Radiology 2005;237:834-840.
6. Drukker K, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Mendelson EB. Computerized detection and classification of cancer on breast ultrasound. Acad Radiol 2004;11:526-535.
7. Drukker K, Horsch K, Giger ML. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography. Acad Radiol 2005;12:970-979.
8. Drukker K, Gruszauskas N, Sennett CA, Giger ML. CADx in diagnostic breast ultrasound: study of a large sample of patients [abstr]. In: Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2006;567.
9. Kupinski MA, Giger ML. Automated seeded lesion segmentation on digital mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998;17:510-517.
10. Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 1978;8:283-298.
11. Metz CE. Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems. J Am Coll Radiol 2006;3:413-422.
12. Pan X, Metz CE. The "proper" binormal model: parametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimation with degenerate data. Acad Radiol 1997;4:380-389.
13. Metz CE, Herman BA, Roe CA. Statistical comparison of two ROC-curve estimates obtained from partially-paired datasets. Med Decis Making 1998;18:110-121.
14. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 1979;6:65-70.
15. Joo S, Moon WK, Kim HC. Computer-aided diagnosis of solid breast nodules on ultrasound with digital image processing and artificial neural network. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2004;2:1397-1400.
16. Beiden SV, Wagner RF, Campbell G. Components-of-variance models and multiplebootstrap experiments: an alternative method for random-effects, receiver operating characteristic analysis. Acad Radiol 2000;7:341-349.
17. Mossman D. Resampling techniques in the analysis of non-binormal ROC data. Med Decis Making 1995;15:358-366.
18. Obuchowski NA. Testing for equivalence of diagnostic tests. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:13-17.