Virtual Teams: Collaborating across Distance

International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2004

Volumn 19, Issue , 2005, Pages 205-248

  Axtell, Carolyn M ^a   Fleck, Steven J ^a   Turner, Nick ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Co located and virtual teams; Media richness and 'cues filtered out'; Virtual teams

Indexed keywords

EID: 84960256508     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/0470013311.ch7     Document Type: Chapter

References (168)

1. Allen, T. J. (1977). Managing the Flow of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Armstrong, D. J., & Cole, P. (2002). Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work. In P. Hinds, & S. Kiesler (eds), Distributed Work (167-187). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Ashforth, B. E., & Lee, R. T. (1990). Defensive Behavior in Organizations-a Preliminary Model. Human Relations, 43(7), 621-648.
4. Athanasiou, R., & Yoshioka, G. A. (1973). The spatial character of friendship formation. Environment and Behavior, 5, 43-65.
5. Baltes, B. B., Dickinson, M. W., Sherman, M. P., Bauer, C. C., & LaGanke, S. (2002). Computer mediated communication and group decision making: A metaanalysis. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87(1), 156-179.
6. Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group & Organization Management, 27(1), 14-49.
7. Berscheid, E., & Walster, H. (1978). Interpersonal Attraction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
8. Cappel, J. J., & Windsor, J. C. (2000). Ethical decision making: A comparison of computer-supported and face-to-face group. Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 95-107.
9. Carlson, J. R., & Zmud, R. W. (1999). Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 153-170.
10. Cartwright, D. (1968). The nature of group cohesiveness. In A. Zander (ed.), Group Dynamics: Research and Theory (3rd edn). New York: Harper & Row.
11. Cherns, A. B. (1976). The principles of socio-technical design. Human Relations, 29, 783-792.
12. Cohen, S. G., & Gibson, C. B. (2003). In the beginning: Introduction and Framework. In C. B.Gibson, & S. G. Cohen (eds), Virtual Teams That Work: Creating Conditions for Effective Virtual Teams (pp. 1-14). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
13. Cramton, C. D. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12(3), 346-371.
14. Cramton, C. D. (2002a). Finding common ground in dispersed collaboration. Organizational Dynamics, 30(4), 356-367.
15. Cramton, C. D. (2002b). Attribution in distributed teams. In P. Hinds, & S. Kiesler (eds), Distributed Works (pp. 191-212). Cambrige, MA: MIT Press.
16. Cramton, C. D., & Orvis, K. L. (2002). Attribution behavior in distributed dyads. Academy of Management Conference, Denver, CO.
17. Cramton, C. D., & Webber, S. S. (2001). Relationships among Geographic Dispersion, Team Processes and Effectiveness in Software Development Work Teams (Working paper). VA: George Mason University.
18. Cramton, C. D., & Wilson, J. M. (2002). Explanation and judgement in distributed groups: An interactional justice perspective. Academy of Management Conference, Denver, CO.
19. Crisp, C. B. (2002). Control enactment in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Conference, Denver, CO.
20. Crisp, C. B., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (2000). Trust over time in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Conference, Washington, DC.
21. Culnan, M. J., & Markus, L. M. (1987). Information Technologies. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (eds), Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (pp. 420-444). London: Sage.
22. Cummings, J. N. (2001). Work Groups and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
23. Cummings, J. N. (in press). Leading groups from a distance: How to mitigate consequences of geographic dispersion. In S. Weisband, & L. E. Atwater (eds),Leadership at a Distance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Cummings, J. N. (2002). Work Groups and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization. Unpublished manuscript. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571.
26. Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H., & Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance-implications for information-systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 355-366.
27. Dennis, A. R., & Wixom, B. H. (2002). Investigating the moderators of the group support systems use with meta-analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 235-257.
28. Depickere, A. (1999). Managing virtual working: Between commitment and control? In P. Jackson (ed.), Virtual Working: Social and Organizational Dynamics. London: Routledge.
29. DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121-147.
30. Eppinger, S. D. (2001). Innovation at the speed of information. Harvard Business Review, January, 149-160.
31. Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social Pressures in Informal Groups. New York: Harper.
32. Finholt, T. A., & Sproull, L. (1990). Electronic groups at work. Organization Science, 1(1), 41-64.
33. Fleck, S. J., Axtell, C. M., Clegg, C. W., & Totterdell, P. (2002). Trust in Virtual Teams (Working paper). Sheffield, UK: Institute of Work Psychology, University of Sheffield.
34. France, E. M., Anderson, A. H., & Gardner, M. (2001). The impact of status and audio conferencing technology on business meetings. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54, 857-876.
35. Gluesing, J. C., Alcordo, T., Baba, M. L., Britt, D., Wagner, K. H., McKether, W., Montplaisir, L., Ratner, H., & Riopelle, K. (2003). The development of global virtual teams. In C. B. Gibson, & S. G. Cohen (eds), Virtual Teams that Work: Creating Conditions for Effective Virtual Teams (pp. 353-380). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36. Gorten, I., & Motwani, S. (1996). Issues in cooperative software engineering using globally distributed teams. Information and Software Technology, 38, 647-655.
37. Griffith, T. L., & Neale, M. A. (2001). Information processing in traditional, hybrid, and virtual teams: From nascent knowledge to transactive memory. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 379-421.
38. Gruenfeld, D. H., Mannix, E. A., Williams, K. Y., & Neale, M. A. (1996). Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 1-15.
39. Handy, C. (1995). Trust and the Virtual Organization. Harvard Business Review, 73(3), 40-50.
40. Herbsleb, J. D., Mockus, A., Finholt, T. A., & Grinter, R. E. (2000). Distance, dependencies, and delay in a global collaboration. ACM 2000 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Philadelphia, PA.
41. Herring, S. C. (1993). Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. Electronic Journal of Communication, 3(2).
42. Herschel, R. T., Cooper, T. R., Smith, L. F., & Arrington, L. (1994). Exploring numerical proportions in a unique context: The group support systems meeting environment. Sex Roles, 31(1/2), 99-123.
43. Hightower, R., & Sayeed, L. (1995). The Impact of Computer-Mediated Communication-Systems on Biased Group Discussion. Computers in Human Behavior, 11(1), 33-44.
44. Hightower, R., & Sayeed, L. (1996). Effects of communication mode and prediscussion information distribution characteristics on information exchange in groups. Information Systems Research, 7(4), 451-465.
45. Hinds, P. (2000). Perspective Taking among Distributed Workers: The Effect of Distance on Shared Mental Models of Work (Working paper). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
46. Hinds, P., & Bailey, D. E. (2000). Virtual Team Performance: Modeling the Impact of Geographic and Temporal Virtuality (Working paper). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
47. Hinds, P., & Bailey, D. E. (in press). Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization Science.
48. Hinds, P., & Kiesler, S. (2002). Distributed Work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Hinds, P., & Mortensen, M. (2002). Understanding antecedents to conflict in geographically distributed research and development teams. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Barcelona.
50. Hinds, P., & Weisband, S. (2003). Knowledge sharing and shared understanding in virtual teams. In C. B. Gibson, & S. G. Cohen (eds.), Virtual Teams that Work: Creating Conditions for Virtual Team Effectiveness (pp. 21-36). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
51. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social Identification. London: Routledge.
52. Hogg, M. A. (1992). The Social Psychology of Group Cohesiveness: From Attraction to Social Identity. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
53. Hollingshead, A. B., McGrath, J. E., & O'Connor, K. M. (1993). Group task performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computermediated versus face-to-face work groups. Small Group Research, 24, 307-333.
54. Hollingshead, A. B. (1998a). Communication, learning and retrieval in transactive memory systems. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 423-442.
55. Hollingshead, A. B. (1998b). Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 659-671.
56. Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
57. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 29-64.
58. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10(6), 791-815.
59. Jehn, K. A. (1997). Qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 530-557.
60. Jones, E., & Nisbett, R. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E. Jones, D. Kanouse, H. Kelley, R. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (eds), Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior (pp. 79-94). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
61. Joshi, A., Labianca, G., & Caligiuri, P. M. (2002). Getting along long distance: Understanding conflict in a multinational team through network analysis. Journal of World Business, 125, 1-8.
62. Kahn, A., & McGaughey, T. A. (1977). Distance and liking: When moving closer produces increased liking. Sociometry, 40(2), 138-144.
63. Kayworth, T. R., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 7-40.
64. Kelley, H., & Michela, J. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457-501.
65. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological-aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39(10), c.
66. Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1992). Group decision-making and communication technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52(1), 96-123.
67. Kiesler, S., & Cummings, J. N. (2002). What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research. In P. Hinds, & S. Kiesler (eds), Distributed Work (pp. 57-83). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
68. Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Gibson, C. B., Tesluk, P. E., & McPherson, S. O.(2002). Five challenges to virtual team performance: Lessons from Sabre Inc. Academy of Management Executive, 16(3), 67-79.
69. Klein, J. A., & Kleinhanns, A. (2003). Closing the time gap in virtual teams. In C. B. Gibson, & S. G. Cohen (eds), Virtual Teams that Work: Creating Conditions for Virtual Team Effectiveness (pp. 381-400). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
70. Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. (1994). Team Mental Models-construct or metaphor. Journal of Management, 20(2), 403-437.
71. Krauss, R., & Fussell, S. R. (1990). Mutual knowledge and communicative effectiveness. In J. Galegher, R. Kraut, & C. Egido (eds), Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work (pp. 111-146). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
72. Kraut, R., Lewis, S., & Swezey, L. (1982). Listener responsiveness and the coordination of conversation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(4), 718-731.
73. Kraut, R., Egido, C., & Galegher, J. (1990). Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaborations. In J. Galegher, R. Kraut, & C. Egido (eds), Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work (pp. 149-171). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
74. Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., Brennan, S. E., & Siegel, J. (2002). Understanding the effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. In P. Hinds, & S. Kiesler (eds), Distributed Work (pp. 137-162). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
75. Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: Thecompositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 325-340.
76. Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, deindividuation and group decision-making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34(2), 283-301.
77. Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1992). Paralinguistic and social perception in computermediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2, 321-341.
78. Lea, M., Spears, R., & de Groot, D. (2001). Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects on social identity processes within groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(5), 526-537.
79. Liang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group and individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(4), 384-393.
80. Lipnack, J., & Stamps, J. (2001). Virtual Teams: People Working Across Boundaries with Technology (2nd edn). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
81. Lott, A. J., & Lott, B. E. (1961). Group cohesiveness, communication level, and conformity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 408-412.
82. Maisonneuve, J., Palmade, G., & Fourment, C. (1952). Selective choices and propinquity.Sociometry, 15(1/2), 135-140.
83. Majchrzak, A., Rice, R. E., King, N., Malhotra, A., & Ba, S. L. (2000). Computermediated inter-organizational knowledge sharing: Insights from a virtual team innovating using a collaborative tool. Information Resources Management Journal, 13(1), 44-53.
84. Mannix, E. A., Griffith, T., & Neale, M. A. (2002). The phenomenology of conflict in distributed work teams. In P. Hinds, & S. Kiesler (eds), Distributed Work (pp.213-235). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
85. Markus, M. L. (1994). Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organizational Science, 5, 502-527.
86. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
87. McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-based and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal,38(1), 24-59.
88. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
89. McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1994). Groups Interacting With Technology.Ideas, Evidence, Issues, and an Agenda. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
90. McGuire, T. W., Kiesler, S., & Siegel, J. (1987). Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,52(5), 917-930.
91. McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review,23(3), 473-490.
92. Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1996) Swift trust and temporary groups. In R. M. Kramer, & T. R. Tyler (eds), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. (pp. 166-195) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
93. Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to Authority. New York: Harper & Row.
94. Mittleman, D. D., & Briggs, R. O. (1999). Communication technology for traditional and virtual teams. In E. Sundstrom (ed.), Supporting Work Team Effectiveness.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
95. Monge, P., & Kirste, K. K. (1980). Measuring proximity in human organization.Social Psychology Quarterly, 43(1), 110-115.
96. Montoya-Weiss, M. M., Massey, A. P., & Song, M. (2001). Getting it together:Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1251-1262.
97. Moore, D., Kurtzberg, T., Thompson, L., & Morris, M. W. (1999). Long and short routes to success in electronically-mediated negotiations: Group affiliations and good vibrations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77,22-43.
98. Moreland, R., Argote, L., & Krishnan, R. (1998). Training people to work in Bryant, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, E. Henderson-King, & J. Myers (eds), Applications of Theory and Research on Groups to Social Issues (Vol. 4, pp. 37-60). New York:Plenum.
99. Mortensen, M., & Hinds, P. J. (2001). Conflict and shared identity in geographically distributed teams. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12(3),212-238.
100. O'Connaill, B., Whittaker, S., & Wilbur, S. (1993). Conversations over video conferences:An evaluation of the spoken aspects of video-mediated communication.Human Computer Interaction, 8, 389-428.
101. O'Leary, M., & Cummings, J. N. (2002). The Spacial, Temporal, and Configurational Characteristics of Geographic Dispersion in Work Teams. Cambridge, MA:MIT Center for E-Business.
102. O'Leary, M., Orlikowski, W., & Yates, J. (2002). Distributed work over the centuries: Trust and control in the Hudson's Bay Company, 1670-1826. In P.Hinds, & S. Kiesler (eds), Distributed Work (pp. 27-55). Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
103. Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction,15(2-3), 139-178.
104. Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (1994). Genre repertoire: Structuring of communicative practices in organisations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(4), 541-574.
105. Pelled, L. H., & Adler, P. S. (1994). Antecedents of intergroup conflict in multifunctional product development teams-a conceptual-model. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 41(1), 21-28.
106. Pelled, L. H. (1996a). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes:An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7(6), 615-631.
107. Pelled, L. H. (1996b). Relational demography and perceptions of group conflict and performance: A field investigation. International Journal of Conflict Management,7(3), 230-246.
108. Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1-28.
109. Pettigrew, T. (1979). The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport's cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 461-476.
110. Poole, M. S., & Holmes, M. E. (1995). Decision development in computer-assisted group decision-making. Human Communication Research, 22(1), 90-127.
111. Poole, M. S. (1999). Organizational challenges for the new forms. In G. Descants, & J. Fulk (ed.), Shaping Organization Form: Communication, Connection and Community (pp. 453-471). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
112. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Sakhel, K., & de Groot, D. (2001). Social influence in computer-mediated communication: The effects of anonymity on group behavior.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(10), 1243-1254.
113. Rennecker, J. A. (2002). The situated nature of virtual teamwork: Understanding the constitutive role of 'place' in the enactment of virtual work configurations.Academy of Management Conference, Denver, CO.
114. Rice, R. E., & Shook, D. (1990). Voice messaging, coordination and communication.In J. Galegher, & R. Kraut, & C. Egido (eds), Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work (pp. 327-350). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
115. Riopelle, K., Gluesing, J. C., Baba, M. L., Britt, D., McKether, W., Montplaisir,L., Ratner, H., & Wagner, K. H. (2003). Context, task and the evolution of technology use in global virtual teams. In C. B. Gibson, & S. G. Cohen (eds),Virtual Teams that Work: Creating Conditions for Effective Virtual Teams (pp.239-264). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
116. Robey, D., Khoo, H. M., & Powers, C. (2000). Situated learning in cross-functional virtual teams. Technical Communication, 47(1), 51-66.
117. Robey, D., Schwaig, K. S., & Lin, L. (2003). Intertwining material and virtual work. Information and Organization, 13, 111-129.
118. Rocco, E., Finholt, T. A., Hofer, E. C., & Herbsleb, J. D. (2000). Designing as If Trust Mattered (Working paper). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
119. Romm, C. T., & Pliskin, N. (1998). Group development in the virtual workplace:The story of a strike. In M. Igbaria, & M. Tan (eds), The Virtual Workplace (pp. 368-388). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
120. Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 174-220.
121. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3),393-404.
122. Sai, C. L., Tan, B. C. Y., & Wei, K. K. (2002). Group polarization and computermediated communication: Effects of communication cues, social presence and anonymity. Information Systems Research, 13(1), 70-90.
123. Saunders, C., Robey, D., & Vavarek, K. A. (1994). The persistence of status differentials in computer conferencing. Human Communication Research, 20(4),433-472.
124. Shunn, C., Crowley, K., & Okada, T. (2002). What makes collaborations across a distance succeed? The case of the cognitive science community. In P. Hinds, & S. Kiesler (eds), Distributed Work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
125. Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. W. (1986). Group Processes in Computer-Mediated Communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37(2), 157-187.
126. Sole, D., & Edmondson, A. C. (2002). Situated knowledge and learning in dispersed teams. British Journal of Management, 13(S2), S17-S34.
127. Sosa, M. E., Eppinger, S. D., Pich, M., McKendrick, D. G., & Stout, S. K. (2002).Factors that influence technical communication in distributed product development:An empirical study in the telecommunications industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(1), 45-58.
128. Sparrow, P. R., & Daniels, K. 1999. Human resource management and the virtual organization: Mapping the future research issues. In C. L. Cooper, & D. M. Rousseau (eds), Trends in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 6, pp. 45-62).Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
129. Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon-the hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21(4), 427-459.
130. Spears, R., Lea, M., & Lee, S. (1990). Deindividuation and group polarization in computer-mediated communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29,121-134.
131. Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1998). Spears, R., & Postmes, T.. 'Social Psychology on the Web'Symposium, Society for Experimental Social Psychology, Lexington, KY, October.
132. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social-context cues-electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32(11), 1492-1512.
133. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1467-1478.
134. Stasser, G., Vaughan, S. I., & Stewart, D. (2000). Pooling unshared information:The benefits of knowing how access to information is distributed among group members. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 102-116.
135. Storck, J. S., & Sproull, L. (1995). Through a glass darkly: What do people learn in video-conferences? Human Communication Research, 22, 197-219.
136. Straus, S. G. & McGrath, J. E. (1994). Does the medium matter: The interaction of task and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 87-97.
137. Straus, S. G. (1998). Seeing is deceiving: Effects of face-to-face, videoconference and telephone media on judgements in job interviews. Academy of Management Conference, San Diego, CA.
138. Straus, S. G., Miles, J. A., & Levesque, L. L. (2001). The effects of videoconferencing,telephone, and face-to-face media on interviewer and applicant judgements in employment interviews. Journal of Management, 27(3), 363-381.
139. Suchan, J., & Hayzak, G. (2001). The communication characteristics of virtual teams: A case study. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 44(3),175-185.
140. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
141. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. London: McGraw-Hill.
142. Thompson, L., & Nadler, J. (2002). Negotiating via information technology: Theory and application. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 109-124.
143. Thomsen, K. (1969). Bopælsafstand og valg af ægtefælle. Sosiologiske Meddelelser,13, 75-98.
144. Townsend, A. M., DeMarie, S. M., & Hendrickson, A. R. (1998). Virtual teams:Technology and the workplace of the future. The Academy of Management Executive, 12(3), 17-29.
145. Tyre, M. J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1994). Windows of opportunity-temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organization Science, 5(1),98-118.
146. van den Bulte, C., & Moenaert, R. K. (1998). The effects of R&D team co-location on communication patterns among R&D, marketing, and manufacturing. Management Science, 44(11), S1-S18.
147. van den Ven, A. H., Delbeq, A. L., & Koening, R. J. (1976). Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review, 41,322-338.
148. Veinott, E. S., Olson, J., Olson, G. M., & Fu, X. (1999). Video helps remote work:speakers who need to negotiate common ground benefit from seeing each other.CHI 99 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Pittsburgh, PA.
149. Vickery, C. M., Clark, T. D., & Carlson, J. R. (1999). Virtual positions: An examination of structure and performance in ad hoc workgroups. Information Systems Journal, 9(4), 291-312.
150. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction-a relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52-90.
151. Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computermediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19(1), 50-88.
152. Walther, J. B. (1994). Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20(4), 473-501.
153. Walther, J. B., Anderson, J. F., & Park, D. W. (1994). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction-a meta-analysis of social and antisocial communication.Communication Research, 21(4), 460-487.
154. Walther, J. B., & Tidwell, L. C. (1995). Nonverbal cues in computer-mediated communication, and the effect of chronemics on relational communication.Journal of Organizational Computing, 5, 355-378.
155. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal,and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-43.
156. Walther, J. B. (1997). Group and interpersonal effects in international computermediated collaboration. Human Communication Research, 23(3), 342-369.
157. Walther, J. B. & D'Addario, K. P. (2001). The impacts of emoticons on message interpretation in computer-mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19(3), 324-347.
158. Walther, J. B. (2002). Time effects in computer-mediated groups: Past, present, and future. In P. Hinds, & S. Kiesler (eds), Distributed Work (pp. 235-259).Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
159. Warkentin, M. E., Sayeed, L., & Hightower, R. (1997). Virtual teams versus faceto-face teams: An exploratory study of a Web-based conference system. Decision Sciences, 28(4), 975-996.
160. Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In G. R. Goethals (ed.), Theories of Group Behavior (pp. 185-208). New York: Springer-Verlag.
161. Weick, K. E., & Bougon, M. G. (1986). Organizations as cogntive maps: Charting ways to success and failure. In H. P. Simms, & D. A. Gioia (eds), The Thinking Organization: Dynamics of Organizational Social Cognition. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
162. Weisband, S., & Atwater, L. E. (1999). Evaluating self and others in electronic and face-to-face groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), 632-639.
163. Weisband, S. P., Schneider, S. K., & Conolly, T. (1995). Computer-mediated communication and social information: Status salience and status differences.Academy of Management Journal, 38(4), 1124-1151.
164. Wiesenfeld, B. M., Raghuram, S., & Garud, R. (1999). Communication patterns as determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(4), 777-790.
165. Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations:A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol.20, pp. 77-140). Stamford, CT: Jai Press Inc.
166. Wilson, J. M., Straus, S. G., & McEvily, B. (2002). All in due time: The development of trust in electronic and face to face groups. Academy of Management Conference, Denver, CO.
167. Zheng, J., Bos, N., Olson, J. S., & Olson, G. M. (2001). Trust without touch:Jump-start trust with social chat. CHIOI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, WA.
168. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., Brewer, M. B., & Peng, Y. (1996). Collaboration structure and informant dilemmas in biotechnology. In R. M. Kramer, & T. R. Tyler (eds), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (pp. 90-113). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.