Influence of endodontic treatment, post insertion, and ceramic restoration on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars

International Endodontic Journal

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 469-477

  Bitter, Kerstin ^a   Meyer Lueckel, H ^b   Fotiadis, N ^a   Blunck, U ^a   Neumann, K ^a   Kielbassa, A M ^a   Paris, S ^b  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ceramic inlays; Ceramic onlays; Fibre post; Fracture resistance; Post endodontic restoration; Thermo mechanical loading

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MAXILLA; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE; PREMOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; DENTAL INLAY; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DEVICES; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES; PROCEDURES; TOOTH FRACTURES;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; INLAYS; MAXILLA; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; ROOT CANAL THERAPY; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TOOTH FRACTURES;

DENTAL PORCELAIN;

EID: 77953755249     PISSN: 01432885     EISSN: 13652591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01701.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2002, 87:431-7.
2. Ausiello P, De Gee AJ, Rengo S, Davidson CL. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated premolars adhesively restored. American Journal of Dentistry 1997, 10:237-41.
3. Bateman G, Ricketts DN, Saunders WP. Fibre-based post systems: a review. British Dental Journal 2003, 195:43-8.
4. Bitter K, Noetzel J, Stamm O. Randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of post placement on failure rate of postendodontic restorations: preliminary results of a mean period of 32 months. Journal of Endodontics 2009, 35:1477-82.
5. Bremer BD, Geurtsen W. Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites. American Journal of Dentistry 2001, 14:216-20.
6. Burke FJ. Tooth fracture in vivo and in vitro. Journal of Dentistry 1992, 20:131-9.
7. Butz F, Lennon AM, Heydecke G, Strub JR. Survival rate and fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post-and-core systems: an in vitro study. The International Journal of Prosthodontics 2001, 14:58-64.
8. Cagidiaco MC, Garcia-Godoy F, Vichi A, Grandini S, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Placement of fiber prefabricated or custom made posts affects the 3-year survival of endodontically treated premolars. American Journal of Dentistry 2008, 21:179-84.
9. Cavel WT, Kelsey WP, Blankenau RJ. An in vivo study of cuspal fracture. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1985, 53:38-42.
10. Dejak B, Mlotkowski A. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2008, 99:131-40.
11. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Grandini S, De Sanctis M, Goracci C. Post placement affects survival of endodontically treated premolars. Journal of Dental Research 2007, 86:729-34.
12. de Freitas CR, Miranda MI, de Andrade MF, Flores VH, Vaz LG, Guimaraes C. Resistance to maxillary premolar fractures after restoration of class II preparations with resin composite or ceromer. Quintessence International 2002, 33:589-94.
13. Habekost LV, Camacho GB, Pinto MB, Demarco FF. Fracture resistance of premolars restored with partial ceramic restorations and submitted to two different loading stresses. Operative Dentistry 2006, 31:204-11.
14. Habekost L, Camacho GB, Azevedo EC, Demarco FF. Fracture resistance of thermal cycled and endodontically treated premolars with adhesive restorations. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2007, 98:186-92.
15. Hannig C, Westphal C, Becker K, Attin T. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2005, 94:342-9.
16. Hansen EK, Asmussen E, Christiansen NC. In vivo fractures of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with amalgam. Endodontics & Dental Traumatology 1990, 6:49-55.
17. Hofmann N, Just N, Haller B, Hugo B, Klaiber B. The effect of glass ionomer cement or composite resin bases on restoration of cuspal stiffness of endodontically treated premolars in vitro. Clinical Oral Investigations 1998, 2:77-83.
18. Khera SC, Goel VK, Chen RC, Gurusami SA. Parameters of MOD cavity preparations: a 3-D FEM study, Part II. Operative Dentistry 1991, 16:42-54.
19. Krejci I, Duc O, Dietschi D, de Campos E. Marginal adaptation, retention and fracture resistance of adhesive composite restorations on devital teeth with and without posts. Operative Dentistry 2003, 28:127-35.
20. Lang H, Korkmaz Y, Schneider K, Raab WH. Impact of endodontic treatments on the rigidity of the root. Journal of Dental Research 2006, 85:364-8.
21. Lin CL, Chang CH, Wang CH, Ko CC, Lee HE. Numerical investigation of the factors affecting interfacial stresses in an MOD restored tooth by auto-meshed finite element method. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2001, 28:517-25.
22. Magne P, Belser UC. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure. The International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 2003, 23:543-55.
23. Magne P, Oganesyan T. Premolar cuspal flexure as a function of restorative material and occlusal contact location. Quintessence International 2009, 40:363-70.
24. Manhart J, Schmidt M, Chen HY, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging. Operative Dentistry 2001, 26:357-66.
25. Mondelli J, Steagall L, Ishikiriama A, de Lima Navarro MF, Soares FB. Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1980, 43:419-22.
26. Mota CS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB, Powers JM. Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 2003, 5:63-70.
27. Naumann M, Preuss A, Frankenberger R. Reinforcement effect of adhesively luted fiber reinforced composite versus titanium posts. Dental Materials 2007, 23:138-44.
28. Naumann M, Sterzenbach G, Rosentritt M, Beuer F, Frankenberger R. Is adhesive cementation of endodontic posts necessary? Journal of Endodontics 2008, 34:1006-10.
29. Naumann M, Metzdorf G, Fokkinga W. Influence of test parameters on in vitro fracture resistance of post-endodontic restorations: a structured review. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2009, 36:299-312.
30. Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. Journal of Endodontics 1989, 15:512-6.
31. Ritter AV, Baratieri LN. Ceramic restorations for posterior teeth: guidelines for the clinician. Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 1999, 11:72-86.
32. Salameh Z, Sorrentino R, Papacchini F. Fracture resistance and failure patterns of endodontically treated mandibular molars restored using resin composite with or without translucent glass fiber posts. Journal of Endodontics 2006, 32:752-5.
33. Salameh Z, Sorrentino R, Ounsi HF. Effect of different all-ceramic crown system on fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with and without glass fiber posts. Journal of Endodontics 2007, 33:848-51.
34. Salameh Z, Sorrentino R, Ounsi HF, Sadig W, Atiyeh F, Ferrari M. The effect of different full-coverage crown systems on fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated maxillary incisors restored with and without glass fiber posts. Journal of Endodontics 2008, 34:842-6.
35. Schwartz RS, Fransman R. Adhesive dentistry and endodontics: materials, clinical strategies and procedures for restoration of access cavities: a review. Journal of Endodontics 2005, 31:151-65.
36. Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. Journal of Endodontics 2004, 30:289-301.
37. Siso SH, Hurmuzlu F, Turgut M, Altundasar E, Serper A, Er K. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques. International Endodontic Journal 2007, 40:161-8.
38. Soares CJ, Soares PV, de Freitas Santos-Filho PC, Castro CG, Magalhaes D, Versluis A. The influence of cavity design and glass fiber posts on biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars. Journal of Endodontics 2008a, 34:1015-9.
39. Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Martins LR, Soares CJ. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2008b, 99:30-7.
40. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1984, 51:780-4.
41. Sorrentino R, Monticelli F, Goracci C. Effect of post-retained composite restorations and amount of coronal residual structure on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth. American Journal of Dentistry 2007, 20:269-74.
42. Steele A, Johnson BR. In vitro fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars. Journal of Endodontics 1999, 25:6-8.
43. St-Georges AJ, Sturdevant JR, Swift EJ, Thompson JY. Fracture resistance of prepared teeth restored with bonded inlay restorations. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2003, 89:551-7.