Resistance to maxillary premoiar fractures after restoration of Class II preparations with resin composite or ceromer

Quintessence International

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2002, Pages 589-594

  de Freitas, Cláudia Regina Buainain ^a   Miranda, Maria Isabel Serra ^a   de Andrade, Marcelo Ferrarezi ^b   Flores, Victor Humberto Orbegoso ^a   Vaz, Luis Geraldo ^b   Guimarães, Norberto Catanzaro ^b  

^a State University of São Paulo ^*  (Brazil)

^b SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Ceromer; Class II restoration; Fracture; Polymer; Resin composite

Indexed keywords

CEROMER; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; ENFORCE SURE CURE; ENFORCE-SURE CURE; FILTEK Z250; OPTIBOND SOLO PLUS; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SOLIDEX;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; MAXILLA; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE; THERMODYNAMICS; TIME; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH FRACTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; CERAMICS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; INLAYS; MAXILLA; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; THERMODYNAMICS; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH FRACTURES;

EID: 0036717754     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Vale WA. Cavntj’ preparation and further thoughts on high speed, Br Dent J 1959:107:333-346.
2. Mondelli J, Steagall L, Ishikiriama A, de Lima Navarro MF, Soares FB. Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations. J Proslhet Dent 1980:45:419-422.
3. Larson TD. Douglas WH, Geistfeld RE. Effect of prepared cavities on the strength of teeth. Oper Dent 1981:6:2-5.
4. El-Sherii MH, Halhoul MN, Kamar AA, Nour El-Din A. Fracture strength of premolars «ith Class 2 silver amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 1988:13:50-53.
5. Jagadish S, Yogesh BG, Fracture resistance of teeth with class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations, Oper Dent 1990:15:42-47.
6. Flores VHO, Estudo da microinfiltraçào marginal em restauračões de Classe V. Efeito dos sistemas adesivos e técnicas de preparo thesisJ. Araraquara, Brazil: School of Dentistry’, State University’ of São Paulo, 2000.
7. Dekon SSC, Martins S, Marquczini L. Prótese parcial fwa adesiva sem estrutura metálica-Artglass com reforeo de Ribbond. RevAPCL 1999:2(1):85-88
8. Armstrong DJ, Kimball D. Fiber-reinforced polymerceramic fixed partial dentures in the esthetic zone: A clinical and laboratory case perspective. Quintessence Dent Technol 1999:22:95-106.
9. Galan J Jr. Contribuielo ao estudo das principáis dimensSes dos dentés hutnanos permanentes de leucodermas BrasQeiros em ambos os sexos. Rev Bras Odontol 1970:163:145.
10. Sá D, Gabrieili F, Estudo da infiltaçào marginal em restauraçSes com amalgama. Efeito da liga, vemiz e bruniduta. Rev Fac Farm Odontol Ribeirio Preto 1979:16:53-62.
11. Davidson CL. Restoring the curing contraction with adhesive composites, J Prosthet Dent 1986:55:446-447.
12. Devolio R. Resina fot opo lim eriza vel com filamentos cerámicos para laboratorio. PCL Rev Bras Prótese Clin Lab 1999; l(l):37-39.
13. Pereira JC, Atta MT, Ishikiriama A, Navarro MFL, Francischone CE, Mondelli J. Resistencia à fratura de dentés molares superiores submetidos a diversos tipos de preparação cavitária, Estomatol Cult 1983;13(2):20-24.
14. Burke FJT, Tooth fracture "in vivo" and "in vitro." J Dent 1992;20:131-139.
15. Bell JG, Smith MC, de Pont JJ. Cuspai failures of MOD restored teeth, Aust Dent J 1982:27:283-287.
16. Denehy GE, Tomey DL, Internal enamel reinforced through micromechanical bonding. J Prosthet Dent 1976:36:171-175.
17. Mondelli RFL, Barbosa WPS. Mondelli J, Franco EB, Carvallio RM. fracture strength of weakened human premolars restored with amalgam with and without cusp coverage. Am IDent 1998;11(41):181-184.
18. Eakle WS. Fraelure resistance of teeth restored with class II bonded resin composites, J Dent Res 1986;65:149-153.
19. Eaide WS, Braly BV. Fracture resistance of human teeth with mesial-occlusal-distal cavities prepared with sharp and rüund infernal line forms. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:646-649.
20. McCullock AJ, Smith BGN. In vitro studies of cuspal movement produced by adhesive restorative materials. Ër Dent J 1986:161:405-409.
21. McCullock AJ, Smith BGN. In vitro studies of cusp reinforcement with adhesive restorative material. Br Dent 1986:161:450-462.
22. Gelb MN, Barouch E, Simonsen RJ. Resistance to eusp fracture in class II prepared and restored premolars. J Prosthet Dent 1986:55:184-185.
23. Fahl N Jr, Casellini RC. Teenologia FRC/Cerômero: El futuro de la odontología estétiea adhesiva hiofuncional Signature Int 1998:3(2):5-11.
24. Abi-Rached A, de Freitas CRB, Ahid F, de Andrade MF Prótese adesiva posterior eom sistema Sculpture/ Fibrekor-Relato de caso clínico. PCL Rev Bras Prótese Clin Lab 2000:2:7-15.