Effect of post-retained composite restorations and amount of coronal residual structure on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 269-274

  Sorrentino, Roberto ^a   Monticelli, Francesca ^a   Goracci, Cecilia ^a   Zarone, Fernando ^b   Tay, Franklin R ^c   García Godoy, Franklin ^d   Ferrari, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^c MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^d NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; COMPOSITE DENTAL RESIN; POLYURETHAN; RESIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH PULP DISEASE;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; HUMANS; POLYURETHANES; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH PREPARATION; TOOTH, NONVITAL;

EID: 35348959002     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Llena-Puy MC, Forner-Navarro L, Barbero-Navarro I. Vertical root fracture in endodontically treated teeth: A review of 25 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 92: 553-555.
2. Testori T, Badino M, Castagnola M. Vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth: A clinical survey of 36 cases. J Endod 1993; 19: 87-91.
3. Tamse A, Fuss Z, Lustig J, Kaplavi J. An evaluation of endodontically treated vertically fractured teeth. J Endod 1999; 7: 506-508.
4. Fennis WMM, Kuijs RH, Kreulen CM, Roeters FJ, Creugers NH, Burgersdijk RC. A survey of cusp fractures in a population of general dental practices. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 559-563.
5. Khers SC, Carpenter CW, Vetter JD, Staley RN. Anatomy of cusps of posterior teeth and their fracture potential. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64: 139-147.
6. Hansen EK, Asmussen E, Christiansen NC. In vivo fractures of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with amalgam. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990; 10: 49-55.
7. Sedgley CM, Messer HH. Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle? J Endod 1992; 18: 332-335.
8. Ross IF. Fracture susceptibility of endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 1980; 6: 560-565.
9. Salis SG, Hood JAA, Stokes ANS, Kirk EEJ. Patterns of indirect fracture in intact and restored human premolar teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1987; 3: 10-14.
10. Caputo AA, Standlee JP. Pins and posts - Why, when and how. Dent Clin North Am 1976; 20: 299-311.
11. Somkul E, Stannard JG. Strength of roots before and after endodontic treatment and restoration. J Endod 1992; 18: 440-443.
12. Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:431-437.
13. Hudis SI, Goldstein GR. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55: 33-38.
14. Ortega VL, Pegoraro LF, Conti PCR, Do Valle AL, Bonfante G. Evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars, restored with ceromer or heat-pressed ceramic inlays and fixed with dual-resin cements. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 393-397.
15. Creugers NH, Mentink AG, Kayser AF. An analysis of durability data on post and core restorations. J Dent 1993; 21: 281-284.
16. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: A study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51:780-784.
17. Torbjörner A, Karlsson S, Ödman PA. Survival rate and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 439-444.
18. Yamada Y, Tsubota Y, Fukushima S. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 94-98.
19. Ausiello P, Gee AJ, Rengo S, Davidson CL. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated premolars adhesively restored. Am J Dent 1997; 10:237-241.
20. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71: 565-567.
21. Akkayan B, Canikioglu B. Resistance to fracture of crowned teeth restored with different post systems. Eur J Prosthod Restar Dent 1998; 6: 13-18.
22. Libman WJ, Nicholls JI. Load fatigue of teeth restored with cast posts and cores and complete crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995; 8:155-161.
23. Goldberg AJ, Burstone CJ. The use of continuous fiber reinforcement in dentistry. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 197-202.
24. Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using quartz fibre, carbon-quartz fibre and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal posts. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1: 153-158.
25. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999; 27: 275-278.
26. Goodacre CJ, Spolnik KJ. The prosthodontic management of endodontically treated teeth: A literature review. Part HI. Tooth preparation considerations. J Prosthodont 1995; 4: 122-128.
27. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 52: 28-35.
28. Goodacre CJ, Spolnik KJ. The prosthodontic management of endodontically treated teeth: A literature review. Part II. Maintaining the apical seal. J Prosthodont 1995; 4: 51-53.
29. Abramovitz L, Lev R, Fuss Z, Metzger Z. The unpredictability of seal after post space preparation: A fluid transport study. J Endod 2001;27:292-295.
30. Hansen EK, Asmussen E. Influence of temporary filling materials on effect of dentin-bonding agents. Scand J Dent Res 1987; 95: 516-520.
31. Craig RG. Restorative dental materials. 8th ed., St. Louis: CV Mosby Co., 1989; 272.
32. Ngoh EC, Pashley DH, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Kimbrough F. Effects of eugenol on resin bond strengths to root canal dentin. J Endod 2001; 27: 411-414.
33. Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A literature review. J Endod 2004; 30: 289-301.
34. Tjan A, Nemetz H. Effect of eugenol-containing endodontic sealer on retention of prefabricated posts luted with an adhesive composite resin cement. Quintessence Int 1992; 22: 839-844.
35. Schwartz RS, Murchison DF, Walker WA. Effects of eugenol and noneugenol endodontic sealer cements on post retention. J Endod 1998; 24: 564-567.
36. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Influence of eugenol-containing temporary cement on efficacy of dentin-bonding systems. Eur J Oral Sci 1999; 107: 65-69.
37. Mayhew JT, Windchy AM, Goldsmith LJ, Gettleman L. Effect of root canal sealers and irrigation agents on retention of preformed posts luted with a resin cement. J Endod 2000; 26: 341-344.
38. Boone KJ, Murchison DF, Schindler WG, Walker WA. Post retention: The effect of sequence of post-space preparation, cementation time, and different sealers. J Endod 2001 ; 27: 768-771.
39. Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts and composite cores after cyclic loading: A confocal microscopic study. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 284-291.
40. Wolanek GA, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Kimbrough WF, Volkmann KR. In vitro bacterial penetration of endodontically treated teeth coronally sealed with a dentin bonding agent. J Endod 2001 ; 27: 354-357.
41. Reis PNB, Ferreira JAM, Costa JDM, Richardson MOW. Fatigue damage in a glass fibre reinforced polypropylene composite. In: Found MS. Experimental techniques and design in composite materials. 4. A.A. Balkema Publishers, Lisse, 2002; 33-36.
42. De Iorio A, Ianniello D, Iannuzzi R, Penta F, Apicella A, Di Palma L. Strength criteria for composite material structures. In: Found MS. Experimental techniques and design in composite materials. 4. A.A. Balkema Publishers, Lisse, 2002; 62-64.
43. Korioth TW, Versluis A. Modeling the mechanical behavior of the jaws and their related structures by finite element (FE) analysis. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997; 8: 90-104.