Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 87, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 431-437

  Akkayan, Begüm ^a,b,c   Gülmez, Turgut ^a,b  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c Department of Prosthetic Dentistry ^*  (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; ADHESIVE AGENT; GLASS FIBER; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN CEMENT; SILICON DIOXIDE; TITANIUM; TOOTH CEMENT; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; GLASS; SINGLE BOND; ZIRCONIUM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; COMPRESSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAXILLA; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; VELOCITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; ELASTICITY; MATERIALS TESTING; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH PULP DISEASE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CROWNS; CUSPID; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; ELASTICITY; GLASS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; QUARTZ; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TITANIUM; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH, NONVITAL; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 0036546561     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2002.123227     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Caputo AA, Standlee JP. Biomechanics in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 1987. p. 185-203.
2. Caputo AA, Standlee JP. Pins and posts - why, when and how. Dent Clin North Am 1976;20:299-311.
3. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:780-4.
4. Sedgley CM, Messer HH. Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle? J Endod 1992;18:332-5.
5. Huang TJ, Schilder H, Nathanson D. Effects of moisture content and endodontic treatment on some mechanical properties of human dentin. J Endod 1992;18:209-15.
6. Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod 1989;15:512-6.
7. Trope M, Ray HL Jr. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated roots. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;73:99-102.
8. Guzy GE, Nicholls JI. In vitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with and without endo-post reinforcement. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:39-44.
9. Akkayan B, Caniklioglu B. Resistance to fracture of crowned teeth restored with different post systems. Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent 1998;6:13-8.
10. Sornkul E, Stannard JG. Strength of roots before and after endodontic treatment and restoration. J Endod 1992;18:440-3.
11. Creugers NH, Mentink AG, Kayser AF. An analysis of durability data on post and core restorations. J Dent 1993;21:281-4.
12. Hudis SI, Goldstein GR. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:33-8.
13. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Effect of post adaptation on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:419-24.
14. Burgess JO, Summitt JB, Robbins JW. The resistance to tensile, compression, and torsional forces provided by four post systems. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:899-903.
15. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:28-35.
16. Cooney JP, Caputo AA, Trabert KC. Retention and stress distribution of tapered-end endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:540-6.
17. Tjan AH, Grant BE, Dunn JR. Microleakage of composite resin cores treated with various dentin bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:24-9.
18. Yang HS, Lang LA, Molina A, Felton DA. The effects of dowel design and load direction on dowel-and-core restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:558-67.
19. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:565-7.
20. Standlee JP, Caputo AA. The retentive and stress distributing properties of split threaded endodontic dowels. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:436-42.
21. Libman WJ, Nicholls JI. Load fatigue of teeth restored with cast posts and cores and complete crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:155-61.
22. Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:151-7.
23. Christel P, Meunier A, Heller M, Torre JP, Peille CN. Mechanical properties and short-term in-vivo evaluation of yttrium-oxide-partially- stabilized zirconia. J Biomed Mater Res 1989;23:45-61.
24. Kwiatkowski S, Geller W. A preliminary consideration of the glass-ceramic dowel post and core. Int J Prosthodont 1989;2:51-5.
25. Vallittu PK. A review of fiber-reinforced denture base resins. J Prosthodont 1996;5:270-6.
26. Goldberg AJ, Burstone CJ. The use of continuous fiber reinforcement in dentistry. Dent Mater 1992;8:197-202.
27. Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using quartz fiber, carbon-quartz fiber, and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal posts. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:153-8.
28. Rosentritt M, Fürer C, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. Comparison of in vitro fracture strength of metallic and tooth-coloured posts and cores. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:595-601.
29. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999;27:275-8.
30. Butz F, Lennon AM, Heydecke G, Strub JR. Survival rate and fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post-and-core systems: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:58-64.