Fracture resistance of premolars restored with partial ceramic restorations and submitted to two different loading stresses

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 204-211

  De Habekost, Luciano V ^a,b   Camacho, Guilherme Brião ^a   Pinto, Márcia Bueno ^a   Demarco, Flávio F ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PELOTAS   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; INJURY; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH FRACTURE; WEIGHT BEARING;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; CERAMICS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; HUMANS; INLAYS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH FRACTURES; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 33646155936     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2341/05-11     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abu Hassan MI, Abu Hammad OA & Harrison A (2000) Stress distribution associated with loaded ceramic onlay restorations with different designs of marginal preparation. An FEA study Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 27(4) 294-298.
2. th edition Philadelphia Saunders WB Company p 33-74.
3. Banks RG (1990) Conservative posterior ceramic restorations: A literature review The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 63(6) 619-626.
4. Blatz MB (2002) Long-term clinical success of all-ceramic posterior restorations Quintessence International 33(6) 415-426.
5. Bremer BD & Geurtsen W (2001) Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites American Journal of Dentistry 14(4) 216-220.
6. Burke FJ, Watts DC, Wilson NH & Wilson MA (1991) Current status and rationale for composite inlays and onlays British Dental Journal 170(7) 269-273.
7. Burke FJ, Wilson NH & Watts DC (1993) The effect of cuspal coverage on the fracture resistance with indirect composite resin restorations Quintessence International 24(12) 875-880.
8. Cavel WT, Kelsey WP & Blankenau RJ (1985) An in vivo study of cuspal fracture The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 53(1) 38-42.
9. Dalpino PH, Francischone CE, Ishikiriama A & Franco EB (2002) Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials American Journal of Dentistry 15(6) 389-394.
10. de Freitas CR, Miranda MI, de Andrade MF, Flores VH, Vaz LG & Guimaraes C (2002) Resistance to maxillary premolar fractures after restoration of Class II preparations with resin composite or ceromer Quintessence International 33(8) 589-594.
11. Dietschi D, Maeder M, Meyer JM & Holz J (1990) In vitro resistance to fracture of porcelain inlays bonded to tooth Quintessence International 21(10) 823-831.
12. Eakle WS, Staninec M & Lacy AM (1992) Effect of bonded amalgam on the fracture resistance of teeth The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 68(2) 257-260.
13. Edelhoff D & Sorensen JA (2002) Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry 22(3) 241-249.
14. Fuzzi M & Rappelli G (1998) Survival rate of ceramic inlays Journal of Dentistry 26(7) 623-626.
15. Galan J Jr (1970) Principle dimensions of human permanent teeth in Brasilians of both sexes with rencoderma Revista Brasileira de Odontologia 27(163) 145-158.
16. Haller B, Hofmann N, Klaiber B & Bloching U (1993) Effect of storage media on microleakage of five dentin bonding agents Dental Materials 9(3) 191-197.
17. Hickel R & Manhart J (2001) Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 3(1) 45-64.
18. Krejci I, Duc O, Dietschi D & de Campos E (2003) Marginal adaptation, retention and fracture resistance of adhesive composite restorations on devital teeth with and without posts Operative Dentistry 28(2) 127-135.
19. Larson TD, Douglas WH & Geistfeld RE (1981) Effect of prepared cavities on the strength of teeth Operative Dentistry 6(1) 2-5.
20. Lopes LM, Leitao JG & Douglas WH (1991) Effect of a new resin inlay/onlay restorative material on cuspal reinforcement Quintessence International 22(8) 641-645.
21. Milleding P, Ortengren U & Karlsson S (1995) Ceramic inlay systems: Some clinical aspects Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 22(8) 571-580.
22. Mondelli J, Steagall L, Ishikiriama A, de Lima Navarro MF & Soares FB (1980) Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 43(4) 419-422.
23. Mondelli RF, Barbosa WF, Mondelli J, Franco EB & Carvalho RM (1998) Fracture strength of weakened human premolars restored with amalgam with and without cusp coverage American Journal of Dentistry 11(4) 181-184.
24. Ritter AV & Baratieri LN (1999) Ceramic restorations for posterior teeth: Guidelines for the clinician Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 11(2) 72-86.
25. Salis SG, Hood JA, Kirk EE & Stokes AN (1987) Impact-fracture energy of human premolar teeth The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 58(1) 43-48.
26. St-Georges AJ, Sturdevant JR, Swift EJ Jr & Thompson JY (2003) Fracture resistance of prepared teeth restored with bonded inlay restorations The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 89(6) 551-557.
27. Thordrup M, Isidor F & Horsted-Bindslev P (2001) A 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays Quintessence International 32(3) 199-205.
28. Vale WA (1959) Cavity preparation and further thoughts on high speed British Dental Journal 107(11) 333-346.
29. Van Dijken JW, Hoglund-Aberg C & Olofsson AL (1998) Fired ceramic inlays: A 6-year follow up Journal of Dentistry 26(3) 219-225.
30. Watts DC, Wilson NH & Burke FJ (1995) Indirect composite preparation width and depth and tooth fracture resistance American Journal of Dentistry 8(1) 15-19.