Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 63-70

  Mota, Cristiane Soares ^c   Demarco, Flávio Fernando ^a   Camacho, Guilherme Brião ^a   Powers, John M ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PELOTAS   (Brazil)

^b Houston Biomaterials Research Center   (United States)

^c Department of Operative Dentistry ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; CEMENT; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; RESIN; SILANE; ALUMINUM SILICATE; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; COLORING AGENT; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; ENFORCE SURE CURE; ENFORCE-SURE CURE; FELDSPAR; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POTASSIUM DERIVATIVE; PRIME & BOND NT; RELYX ARC; RESIN CEMENT; SILANE DERIVATIVE; SINGLE BOND;

ARTICLE; CEMENTUM; CERAMICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTIN; ENAMEL; EVALUATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; MATERIALS TESTING; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME; TOOTH DISEASE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ALUMINUM SILICATES; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CERAMICS; COLORING AGENTS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL CEMENTUM; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; INLAYS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; POTASSIUM COMPOUNDS; RESIN CEMENTS; SILANES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0041808026     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review. Oper Dent 1997;22:173-185.
2. Belli S, Inokoshi S, Ozer F, Pereira PN, Ogata M, Tagami J. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations. Oper Dent 2001;26:70-75.
3. Bergman MA. The clinical performance of ceramic inlays: a review. Aust Dent J 1999;44:157-168.
4. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH. A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 1996;21:17-24.
5. Christensen GJ. Acceptability of alternatives for conservative restoration of posterior teeth. Practic Period Aesthet Dent 1995;7:228-232.
6. Davidson CL, De Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite dentin bond strength and thee polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984;63:1396-1399.
7. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 1997;25:435-440.
8. Demarco FF, Ramos OLV, Mota CS, Formolo E, Justino LM. Influence of different restorative techniques on microleakage in Class II cavities with gingival wall in cementum. Oper Dent 2001, 26:253-259.
9. Eick JD, Gwinnett AJ, Pashley DH, Robinson SJ. Current concepts on adhesion to dentin. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997;8:306-335.
10. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987;66:1636-1639.
11. Ferrari M, Mason PN, Fabianelli A, Cagidiano MC, Kugel G, Davidson CL. Influence of tissue characteristics at margins on leakage of Class II indirect porcelain restorations. Am J Dent 1999;12:134-142.
12. Frankenberger R, Petschelt A, Kramer N. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior. Oper Dent 2000;25:459-465.
13. Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 1999;24:147-155.
14. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Dentine permeability and tracers tests J Dent 1999;27:1-11.
15. Gurel G. Porcelain inlays and onlays. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45:117-125.
16. Hahn P, Attin T, Gröfke M, Hellwig E. Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays. Dent Mater 2001;17:191-196.
17. Hasanreisoglu U, Sönmez H, Üctasli, Wilson HG. Microleakage of direct and indirect inlay/onlay systems. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:66-71.
18. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:45-64.
19. Irie M, Suzuki K. Current luting cements: marginal gap formation of composite inlay and their mechanical properties. Dent Mater 2001;17:347-353.
20. Kinomoto Y, Torii M. Photoelastic analysis of polymerization contraction stress in resin composite restorations. J Dent 1998;26:165-172.
21. Kitasako Y, Burrow MF, Katahira N, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Shear bond strengths of three resin cements to dentine over 3 years in vitro. J Dent 2001;29:139-144.
22. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M. Marginal adaptation and fit of adhesive ceramic inlays. J Dent 1993;21:39-46.
23. LoPresti JT, David S, Calamia JR. Microleakage of CAD-CAM porcelain restorations. Am J Dent 1996;9:37-39.
24. Lösche GM. Marginal adaptation of Class II composite fillings: guided polymerization vs reduced light intensity. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:31-39.
25. Mixson JM, Eick JD, Chappel RP, Tira DE, Moore DL. Comparison of two-surface and multiple-surface scoring methodologies for in vitro microleakage studies. Dent Mater 1991;7:191-196.
26. Mjör IA, Moorhead JE, Dahl JE. Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Int Dent J 2000;50:362-366.
27. Moura FRR, Tomazzoni A, Ramos OLV, Demarco FF. Avaliação "in vitro" da infiltração marginal em três sistemas adesivos de frasco único. RPG Rev Pós-Grad Fac Odontol São Paulo 2000;7:35-42.
28. Pashley DH. Clinical considerations of microleakage. J Endod 1990;16:70-77.
29. Patel S, Saunders WP, Burke FJ. Microleakage of dentin-bonded crowns placed with different luting materials. Am J Dent 1997;10:179-183.
30. st Century. Compend Cont Educ Dent 1999;20:1173-1182.
31. Ramos O, Osorio R, Demarco FF, Toledano M. Effect of C factor changes on microleakage of the Class II cavities [abstract 3400]. J Dent Res 2002;80:419.
32. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting: A review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:280-301.
33. Santini A, Mitchell S. Microleakage of composite restorations bonded with three dentin bonding agents. J Esthet Dent 1998;10:296-304.
34. Sorensen JA, Kang SK, Avera SP. Porcelain-composite interface microleakage with various porcelain surface treatments. Dent Mater 1991;7:118-123.
35. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted-Bindslev P. Comparisons of marginal fit and microleakage of ceramic and composite inlays: an in vitro study. J Dent 1994;22:147-153.
36. Torii Y, Itou K, Itota T, Hama K, Konishi N, Nagamine M, Inoue K. Influence of filler content and gap dimension on wear resistance of resin composite luting cements around a CAD/CAM ceramic inlay restoration. Dent Mater J 1999;18:453-461.
37. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998;26:1-20.
38. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Do dental composites always shrink toward the light? J Dent Res 1998;77:1435-1445.
39. Yanagawa T, Finger WJ. Relationship between degree of polymerization of composite resin and bond strength to Gluma-treated dentin. Am J Dent 1994;7:157-60.
40. Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Effects of dentin depth and cavity configuration on bond strength. J Dent Res 1999;78:898-905.
41. Ziskind D, Avivi-Arber L, Haramati O, Rosen L. Amalgam alternatives - microleakage evaluation of clinical procedures. Part I: direct composite/ composite inlay/ ceramic inlay. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:443-447.