Premolar cuspal flexure as a function of restorative material and occlusal contact location

Quintessence International

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 363-370

  Magne, Pascal ^a,b   Oganesyan, Tevan ^b  

^a The Don and Sybil Harrington Foundation   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Composite resins; Cuspal flexure; Finite element analysis; Occlusion; Porcelain inlays; Restorative dentistry

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MASTICATION; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

BICUSPID; BITE FORCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL OCCLUSION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INLAYS; PHOTOGRAPHY, DENTAL; SOFTWARE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TOOTH CROWN;

EID: 77953746523     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Morin DL, Douglas WH, Cross M, DeLong R. Biophysical stress analysis of restored teeth: Experimental strain measurements. Dent Mater 1988; 4: 41-48.
2. Assif D, Marshak BL, Pilo R. Cuspal flexure associated with amalgam restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 258-262.
3. Lopes LM, Leitao JG, Douglas WH. Effect of a new resin inlay/onlay restorative material on cuspal reinforcement. Quintessence Int 1991; 22: 641-645.
4. Douglas WH. Methods to improve fracture resistance of teeth. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC (eds). International Symposium on Posterior Composite Resin Restorative Materials. The Netherlands: Peter Szulc, 1995: 433-441.
5. Hood JAA. Methods to improve fracture resistance of teeth. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC (eds). International Symposium on Posterior Composite Resin Restorative Materials. The Netherlands: Peter Szulc, 1995: 443-450.
6. Panitvisai P, Messer HH. Cuspal deflection in molars in relation to endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod 1995; 21: 57-61.
7. Pilo R, Brosh T, Chweidan H. Cusp reinforcement by bonding of amalgam restorations. J Dent 1998; 26: 467-472.
8. Rees JS. The role of cuspal flexure in the development of abfraction lesions: A finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106: 1028-1032.
9. Jantarat J, Panitvisai P, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Comparison of methods for measuring cuspal deformation in teeth. J Dent 2001; 29: 75-82.
10. Zidan O, Abdel-Keriem U. The effect of amalgam bonding on the stiffness of teeth weakened by cavity preparation. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 680-685.
11. González-López S, De Haro-Gasquet F, Vílchez-Díaz MA, Ceballos L, Bravo M. Effect of restorative procedures and occlusal loading on cuspal deflection. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 33-38.
12. González-López S, Vilchez-Díaz MA, de Haro-Gasquet F, Ceballos L, de Haro-Muñoz C. Cuspal flexure of teeth with composite restorations subjected to occlusal loading. J Adhes Dent 2007; 9: 11-15.
13. Fennis WM, Kuijs RH, Kreulen CM, Verdonschot N, Creugers NH. Fatigue resistance of teeth restored with cuspal-coverage composite restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 313-317.
14. Fennis WM, Tezvergil A, Kuijs RH, et al. In vitro fracture resistance of fiber reinforced cusp-replacing composite restorations. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 565-572.
15. Kuijs RH, Fennis WM, Kreulen CM, Roeters FJ, Verdonschot N, Creugers NH. A comparison of fatigue resistance of three materials for cusp-replacing adhesive restorations. J Dent 2006; 34: 19-25.
16. Magne P, Belser UC. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: Effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003; 23: 543-555.
17. Cattaneo PM, Dalstra M, Frich LH. A three-dimensional finite element model from computed tomography data: A semi-automated method. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2001; 215: 203-213.
18. Verdonschot N, Fennis WM, Kuijs RH, Stolk J, Kreulen CM, Creugers NH. Generation of 3-D finite element models of restored human teeth using micro-CT techniques. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 310-315.
19. Cattaneo PM, Dalstra M, Melsen B. The transfer of occlusal forces through the maxillary molars: A finite element study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123: 367-373.
20. Cattaneo PM, Dalstra M, Melsen B. The finite element method: A tool to study orthodontic tooth movement. J Dent Res 2005; 84: 428-433.
21. Magne P. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 539-548.
22. Magne P, Tan DT. Incisor compliance following operative procedures: A rapid 3-D finite element analysis using micro-CT data. J Adhes Dent 2008; 10: 49-56.
23. Eldiwany M, Powers JM, George LA. Mechanical properties of direct and post-cured composites. Am J Dent 1993; 6: 222-224.
24. Anusavice KJ, Hojjatie B. Influence of incisal length of ceramic and loading orientation on stress distribution in ceramic crowns. J Dent Res 1988; 67: 1371-1375.
25. Farah JW, Craig RG, Meroueh KA. Finite element analysis of three- and four-unit bridges. J Oral Rehabil 1989; 16: 603-611.
26. Nakayama WT, Hall DR, Grenoble DE, Katz JL. Elastic properties of dental resin restorative materials. J Dent Res 1974; 53: 1121-1126.
27. Craig RG, Peyton FA, Johnson DW. Compressive properties of enamel, dental cements, and gold. J Dent Res 1961; 40: 936-945.
28. Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Folwaczny M, Hickel R. Stabilization effects of CAD/CAM ceramic restorations in extended MOD cavities. J Adhes Dent 2004; 6: 239-245.
29. Shor A, Nicholls JI, Phillips KM, Libman WJ. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 64-69.
30. Dejak B, Mlotkowski A. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 99: 131-140.
31. Magne P, Belser UC. Rationalization of shape and related stress distribution in posterior teeth: A finite element study using nonlinear contact analysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002; 22: 425-433.