Survival Rate and Fracture Strength of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Incisors with Moderate Defects Restored with Different Post-and-Core Systems: An in Vitro Study

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 58-64

  Butz, Frank ^a   Lennon, Áine M ^a   Heydecke, Guido ^a,b   Strub, Jörg R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; GLASS IONOMER; GOLD ALLOY; KETAC CEM; KETAC-CEM; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; PANAVIA TPN S; PANAVIA TPN-S; PHOSPHATE; POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENT; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; TITANIUM; ZINC OXIDE; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARE; ENDODONTICS; HEAT; HUMAN; INCISOR; INJURY; INSTRUMENTATION; MASTICATION; MAXILLA; MECHANICAL STRESS; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURVIVAL RATE; THERMODYNAMICS; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH ROOT;

CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; COMPOSITE RESINS; CROWNS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; GOLD ALLOYS; HEAT; HUMANS; INCISOR; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; MASTICATION; MAXILLA; PHOSPHATES; POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENT; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; RESIN CEMENTS; ROOT CANAL THERAPY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURVIVAL RATE; THERMODYNAMICS; TITANIUM; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH ROOT; ZINC OXIDE; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 0035240132     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. Preparations for extensively damaged teeth. In: Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett SE (eds). Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics. Chicago: Quintessence, 1997:181-209.
2. Bergman B, Lundquist P, Sjögren U, Sundquist G. Restorative and endodontic results after treatment with cast posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:10-15.
3. Creugers NH, Mentink AC, Kayser AF. An analysis of durability data on post and core restorations. J Dent 1993;21:281-284.
4. Lovdahl PE, Nicholls JI. Pin-retained amalgam cores vs cast-gold dowel-cores. J Prosthet Dent 1977;38:507-514.
5. Perez Moll JF, Howe DF, Svare CW. Cast gold post and core and pin-retained composite resin bases: A comparative study in strength. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:642-644.
6. Plasmans PJ, Visseren LG, Vrijhoef MM, Kayser AF. In vitro comparison of dowel and core techniques for endodontically treated molars. J Endod 1986;12:382-387.
7. Fraga RC, Chaves BT, Mello GS, Siqueira JF Jr. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots after restoration. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:809-813.
8. Stegaroiu R, Yamada H, Kusakari H, Miyakawa O. Retention and failure mode after cyclic loading in two post and core systems. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:506-511.
9. Chan RW, Bryant RW. Post-core foundations for endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:401-406.
10. Sirimai S, Riis DN, Morgano SM. An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence of vertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:262-269.
11. Sornkul E, Stannard JG. Strength of roots before and after endodontic treatment and restoration. J Endod 1992;18:440-443.
12. Reagan SE, Fruits TJ, Van Brunt CL, Ward CK. Effects of cyclic loading on selected post-and-core systems. Quintessence Int 1999;30: 61-67.
13. Isidor F, Brondum K. Intermittent loading of teeth with tapered, individually cast or prefabricated, parallel-sided posts. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:257-261.
14. Kern M, Pleimes AW, Strub JR. Fracture resistance of cast and all-ceramic post and cores [in German with English summary]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1995;50:451-453.
15. Kern M, Simon MHP, Strub JR. Preliminary clinical experience with zirconia posts [in German with English summary]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1998;53:266-268.
16. Zalkind M, Hochman N. Direct core buildup using a preformed crown and prefabricated zirconium oxide post. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:730-732.
17. Sorensen JA, Mito WT. Rationale and clinical technique for esthetic restoration of endodontically treated teeth with the Cosmopost and IPS Empress post system. Quintessence Dent Technol 1998;12: 81-90.
18. Dong JK, Lüthy H, Wohlwend A, Schärer P. Heat-pressed ceramics: Technology and strength. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:9-16.
19. Kraus BS, Jordan EJ, Abrams LA. The dentition: Its alignment and articulation. In: Kraus BS, Jordan EJ, Abrams LA (eds). A Study of the Masticatory System. Dental Anatomy and Occlusion. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1969:223-237.
20. DeLong R, Pintado MR, Douglas WH. The wear of enamel opposing shaded ceramic restorative materials: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:42-48.
21. Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH, DeLong R, Pintado MR. The wear of a posterior composite in an artificial mouth: A clinical correlation. Dent Mater 1986;2:235-240.
22. Kern M, Strub JR, Lu X-Y. Wear of composite resin veneering materials in a dual-axis chewing simulator. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26: 372-378.
23. Kampe T, Haraldson T, Hannerz H, Carlsson GE. Occlusal perception and bite force in young subjects with and without dental fillings. Acta Odontol Scand 1987;45:101-107.
24. De Soever JA, McCall WD Jr, Holden S, Ash MM Jr. Functional occlusal forces: An investigation by telemetry. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:326-333.
25. Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M. An in vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 1. A computer-controlled mastication simulator [in German with English summary]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990;100:953-960.
26. DeLong R, Douglas WH. Development of an artificial oral environment for the testing of dental restoratives: Bi-axial force and movement control. J Dent Res 1983;62:32-36.
27. Kelly JR. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:652-661.
28. Bates JF, Stafford CD, Harrison A. Masticatory function: A review of the literature. 2. Speed of movement of the mandible, rate of chewing and forces developed in chewing. J Oral Rehabil 1975;2: 281-301.
29. Loney RW, Moulding MB, Ritsco RG. The effect of load angulation on fracture resistance of teeth restored with cast post and cores and crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:247-251.
30. Heydecke G, Butz F, Strub JR. The effect of various post-core buildup designs on the fracture resistance of crown-restored incisors [in German with English summary]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1999;54:637-640.
31. Morgano SM, Milot P. Clinical success of cast metal posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:11-16.
32. Isidor F, Brondum K, Ravnholt G. The influence of post length and crown ferrule length on the resistance to cyclic loading of bovine teeth with prefabricated titanium posts. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:78-82.
33. Lauer H-C, Ottl P, Weigl P. Mechanical resistance of different post-and-core systems [in German with English summary]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1994;49:985-989.
34. Schmeissner H. Comparison of the fracture loads of smooth and screw retained post and core reconstructions [in German with English summary]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1983;38:163-166.
35. Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod 1989;15:512-516.
36. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:529-536.
37. Barkhordar RA, Radke R, Abbasi J. Effect of metal collars on resistance of endodontically treated teeth to root fracture. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:676-678.
38. Libman WJ, Nicholls JI. Load fatigue of teeth restored with cast posts and cores and complete crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:155-161.
39. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Effect of post adaptation on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:419-424.
40. Assif D, Bitenski A, Pilo R, Oren E. Effect of post design on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth with complete crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:36-40.
41. Strub JR, Pontius O, Koutayas S. Survival rate and fracture strength of incisors restored with different post and core systems after exposure in the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehabil (forthcoming).
42. Sidoli GE, King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78: 5-9.