Post placement affects survival of endodontically treated premolars

Journal of Dental Research

Volumn 86, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 729-734

  Ferrari, M ^a   Cagidiaco, M C ^a   Grandini, S ^a   De Sanctis, M ^a   Goracci, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Clinical trial; Endodontically treated teeth; Fiber post; Luting; Restoration

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; FEMALE; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH CROWN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BICUSPID; CROWNS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTIN; FEMALE; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIERS ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 34547935030     PISSN: 00220345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/154405910708600808     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Akkayan B (2004). An in vitro study evaluating the effect of ferrule length on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced and zirconia dowel systems. J Prosthet Dent 92:155-162.
2. Akkayan B, Gulmez T (2002). Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 87:431-437.
3. Aquilino SA, Caplan DJ (2002). Relationship between crown placement and the survival of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 87:256-263.
4. Cagidiaco MC, Radovic I, Simonetti M, Tay FR, Ferrari M (2007). Clinical performance of fiber post restorations in endodontically treated teeth - 2 year results. Int J Prosthodont 20:293-298.
5. Caplan DJ, Kolker J, Rivera EM, Walton RE (2002). Relationship between number of proximal contacts and survival of root canal treated teeth. Int Endod J '35:193-199.
6. Cury AH, Goracci C, de Lima Navarro MF, Carvalho RM, Sadek FT, Tay FR, et al. (2006). Effect of hygroscopic expansion on the push-out resistance of glass ionomer-based cements used for the luting of glass fiber posts. J Endod 32:537-540.
7. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN (2000a). Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 13(Spec No.):9B-13B.
8. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F (2000b). Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores Am J Dent 13(Spec No.):15B-18B.
9. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Goracci C, Vichi A, Mason PN, Tay FR (2007). Long term retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent (in press).
10. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Vallittu PK, Creugers NH (2004). A structured analysis of in vitro failure loads and failure modes of fiber, metal, and ceramic post-and-core systems. Int J Prosthodont 17:476-482.
11. Fokkinga WA, Le Bell AM, Kreulen CM, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK, Creugers NH (2005). Ex vivo fracture resistance of direct resin composite complete crowns with and without posts on maxillary premolars. Int Endod J 38:230-237.
12. Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K (1998). A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 80:151-157.
13. Glazer B (2000). Restoration of endodontically treated teeth with carbon fibre posts - a prospective study. J Can Dent Assoc 66:613-618.
14. Goracci C, Fabianelli A, Sadek FT. Papacchini F. Tay FR, Ferrari M (2005). The contribution of friction to the dislocation resistance of bonded fiber posts. J Endod 31:608-612.
15. Grandini S, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Tay FR, Ferrari M (2005). Fatigue resistance and structural characteristics of fiber posts: three-point bending test and SEM evaluation. Dent Mater 21:75-82.
16. Malferrari S, Monaco C, Scotti R (2003). Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. Int J Prosthodont 16:39-44.
17. Mannocci F, Bertelli E, Sherriff M, Watson TF, Ford TR (2002). Three-year clinical comparison of survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with either full cast coverage or with direct composite restoration. J Prosthet Dent 88:297-301.
18. Monticelli F, Grandini S, Goracci C, Ferrari M. (2003). Clinical behavior of translucent-fiber posts: a 2-year prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 16:593-596.
19. Naumann M, Blankenstein F, Dietrich T (2005a). Survival of glass fibre reinforced composite post restorations after 2 years - an observational clinical study. J Dent 33:305-312.
20. Naumann M, Blankenstein F, Kiessling S, Dietrich T (2005b). Risk factors for failure of glass fiber-reinforced composite post restorations: a prospective observational clinical study. Eur J Oral Sci 113:519-524.
21. Pereira JR, de Ornelas F, Conti PC, do Valle AL (2006). Effect of crown ferrule on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with prefabricated posts. J Prosthet Dent 95:50-54.
22. Pirani C, Chersoni S, Foschi F, Piana G, Loushine RJ, Tay FR, et al. (2005). Does hybridization of intraradicular dentin really improve fiber post retention in endodontically treated teeth? J Endod 31:891-894.
23. Ray HA, Trope M (1995). Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling and the coronal restoration. Int Endod J 28:12-18.
24. Salameh Z, Sorrentino R, Papacchini F, Ounsi HF, Tashkandi E, Goracci C, et al. (2006). Fracture resistance and failure patterns of endodontically treated mandibular molars restored using resin composite with or without translucent glass fiber posts. J Endod 32:752-755.
25. Salameh Z, Sorrentino R, Ounsi HF, Tashkandi T, Tay FR, Ferrari M (2007). Effect of different all-ceramic crown system on fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with and without glass fiber posts. J Adhes Dent (in press).
26. Schwartz RS, Robbins JW (2004). Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod 30:289-301.
27. Sorrentino R, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Zarone F, Tay FR, Ferrari M (2007a). Effect of post and core restorations on the resistance to fracture of endodontically treated maxillary premolars in different restorative systems. J Adhes Dent (in press).
28. Sorrentino R, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Zarone F, Tay FR, Ferrari M (2007b). Effect of post retained composite restorations on the resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth related to the amount of coronal residual structure. Am J Dent (in press).
29. Stankiewicz NR, Wilson PR (2002). The ferrule effect: a literature review. Int Endod J 35:575-581.
30. Tan PL, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, Stanford CM, Tan SC, Johnson WT, et al. (2005). In vitro fracture resistance of endodontically treated central incisors with varying ferrule heights and configurations. J Prosthet Dent 93:331-336.
31. Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Lambrechts P, Weller RN, Pashley DH (2005). Geometric factors affecting dentin bonding in root canals: a theoretical modeling approach. J Endod 31:584-589.
32. Tronstad L, Asbjornsen K, Doving L, Pedersen I, Eriksen HM (2000). Influence of coronal restorations on the periapical health of endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 16:18-21.
33. Zhi-Yue L, Yu-Xing Z (2003). Effects of post-core design and ferrule on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 89:368-373.