Quantitative trait loci influencing fruit-related characteristics of tomato grown in high-temperature conditions

Euphytica

Volumn 174, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 119-135

  Lin, Kuan Hung ^b   Yeh, Wei Lung ^b   Chen, Huei Mei ^c   Lo, Hsiao Feng ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b CHINESE CULTURE UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c AVRDC THE WORLD VEGETABLE CENTER   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP); Inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR); Marker assisted selection (MAS); Quantitative trait loci (QTLs); Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD); Tomato

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; SOLANUM;

EID: 77953308652     PISSN: 00142336     EISSN: 15735060     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-010-0147-6     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. AVRDC (1993) Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center report. AVRDC, Taiwan.
2. AVRDC (1997) Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center report. AVRDC, Taiwan.
3. Bai Y, Feng X, van der Hulst R, Lindhout P (2004) A set of simple PCR markers converted from sequence specific RFLP markers on tomato chromosomes 9 to 12. Mol Breed 13: 281-287.
4. Basten CB, Weir BS, Zeng ZS (2002) QTL cartographer: a reference manual and tutorial for QTL mapping. Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
5. Bernacchi D, Tanksley SD (1997) An interspecific backcross of Lycopersicon esculentum × Lycopersicon hirsutum: linkage analysis and a QTL study of sexual compatibility factors and floral traits. Genetics 147: 861-877.
6. Bernacchi D, Beck-Bunn T, Eshed Y, Lopez J, Petiard V, Zamir D, Tanksley SD (1998) Advanced backcross QTL analysis in tomato. I. Identification of QTLs for traits of agronomic importance from Lycopersicon hirsutum. Theor Appl Genet 97: 381-397.
7. Causse M, Duffe P, Buret M (2004) A genetic map of candidate genes and QTL involved in tomato fruit size and composition. J Exp Bot 55: 1671-1685.
8. Chen FQ, Foolad MR (1999) A molecular linkage map of tomato based on a cross between Lycopersicon esculentum and L. pimpinellifolium and its comparison with other molecular maps of tomato. Genome 42: 94-103.
9. Chen KY, Tanksley SD (2004) High resolution mapping and functional analysis of se2. 1: a major stigma exsertion quantitative trait locus associated with the evolution from allogamy to autogamy in the genus Lycopersicon. Genetics 168: 1563-1573.
10. Chen FQ, Foolad MR, Hyman J, Clair DA, Beelaman RB (1999) Mapping of QTLs for lycopene and other fruit traits in a Lycopersicon esculentum × L. pimpinellifolium cross and comparison of QTLs across tomato species. Mol Breed 5: 283-299.
11. Chetelat RT, Meglic V (2000) Molecular mapping of chromosome segments introgressed from Solanum lycopersicoides into cultivated tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Theor Appl Genet 100: 232-241.
12. de Vicent MC, Tanksley SD (1993) QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tmato cross. Genetics 134: 585-596.
13. Doerge RW, Churchill GA (1996) Permutation tests for multiple loci affecting a quantitative character. Genetics 142: 285-294.
14. Doganlar S, Frary A, Ku HM, Tanksley SD (2002) Mapping quantitative trait loci in inbred backcross lines of Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium (LA1589). Genome 45: 1189-1202.
15. Eshed Y, Zamir D (1995) An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTLs. Genetics 141: 1147-1162.
16. Foolad MR (2007) Genome mapping and molecular breeding of tomato. Int J Plant Genome 2007: 64358.
17. Fray A, Nesbitt TC, Grandillo S, Knaap E, Liu J, Elber R, Alpert KB, Tanksley SD (2000) fe2. 2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science 289: 85-88.
18. Fridman E, Pleban T, Zamir D (2000) A recombination hotspot delimits a wild-species quantitative trait locus for tomato sugar content to 484 bp within an invertase gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 4718-4723.
19. Fridman E, Carrari F, Liu YS, Fernie AR, Zamir D (2004) Zooming in on a quantitative trait for tomato yield using interspecific introgressions. Science 305: 1786-1789.
20. Fulton TM, Chunwongse J, Tanksley SD (1995) Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants. Plant Mol Biol Rep 13: 207-209.
21. Fulton TM, Beckbunn T, Emmatty D, Eshed Y, Lopez J, Petiard V, Zamir D, Tanksley SD (1997) QTL analysis of an advanced backcross of Lycopersicon peruvianum to the cultivated tomato and comparisons with QTLs found in other wild specifics. Theor Appl Genet 95: 881-894.
22. Fulton TM, Grandillo S, Beck-Bunn T, Fridman E, Frampton A, Lopez J (2000) Advanced backcross QTL analysis of a Lycopersicon esculentum × Lycopersicon parviflorum cross. Theor Appl Genet 100: 1025-1042.
23. Georgelis N, Scott JW, Baldwin EA (2004) Relationship of tomato fruit sugar concentration with physical and chemical traits and linkage of RAPD markers. J Am Soc Hort Sci 129: 839-845.
24. Goldman IL, Paran I, Zamir D (1995) Quantitative trait locus analysis of a recombinant inbred line population derived from a Lycopersicum esculentum × Lycopersicum cheesmanii cross. Theor Appl Genet 90: 925-932.
25. Grandillo S, Tanksley SD (1996) Analysis of horticultural traits differentiating the cultivated tomato from the closely related species Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium. Theor Appl Genet 92: 935-951.
26. Grandillo S, Ku HM, Tanksley SD (1999) Identifying the loci responsible for natural variation in fruit size and shape in tomato. Theor Appl Genet 99: 978-987.
27. Gur A, Zamir D (2004) Unused natural variation can lift yield barriers in plant breeding. PLoS Biol 2: 1610-1615.
28. Gur A, Semel Y, Cahaner A, Zamir D (2004) Real time QTL of complex phenotypes in tomato interspecific introgression lines. Trends Plant Sci 9: 33-39.
29. 2 populations. Theor Appl Genet 99: 254-271.
30. Jiang C, Zeng ZB (1995) Multiple trait analysis of genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 140: 1111-1127.
31. Knaap EV, Tanksley SD (2003) The making of a bell pepper-shaped tomato fruit: identification of loci controlling fruit morphology in Yellow Stuffer tomato. Theor Appl Genet 107: 139-147.
32. Kosambi DD (1994) The estimation of map distance from recombination values. Ann Eugenet 12: 172-175.
33. Labate JA, Baldo AM (2005) Tomato SNP discovery by EST mining and resequencing. Mol Breed 16: 343-349.
34. Lande R, Thompson R (1990) Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics 124: 743-756.
35. Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly MJ (1987) Mapmaker: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genome 1: 174-181.
36. Lecomte L, Duffe P, Buret M (2004) Marker-assisted introgression of five QTLs controlling fruit quality traits into three tomato lines revealed interactions between QTLs and genetic backgrounds. Theor Appl Genet 109: 658-668.
37. Lin KH, Lo HF, Lee SP, Kuo C, Chen TC, Yeh WL (2006) RAPD markers for the identification of yield traits in tomatoes under heat stress via bulked segregant analysis. Hereditas 143: 142-154.
38. Lippmana Z, Tanksley SD (2001) Dissecting the genetic pathway to extreme fruit size in tomato using a cross between the small-fruited wild species Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium and L. esculentum var. Giant Heirloom. Genetics 158: 413-422.
39. Lohar DP, Peet WE (1998) Floral characteristics of heat-tolerance and heat-sensitive tomato cultivars at high temperature. HortScience 73: 53-60.
40. Marin TB, Moyseeno JB, Monforte AJ, van Der KE (2007) Morphological variation in tomato: a comprehensive study of quantitative trait loci controlling fruit shape and development. J Exp Bot 58: 1339-1349.
41. Messeguer R, Ganal MW, Steffens JC, Tanksley SD (1991) Characterization of the level, target sites and inheritance of cytosine methylation in tomato nuclear DNA. Plant Mol Biol 16: 753-770.
42. Mijalski T, Harder A, Halder T, Kersten M, Horsch M (2005) Identification of coexpressed gene clusters in a comparative analysis of transcriptome and proteome in mouse tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 8621-8626.
43. Monforte AJ, Friedman E, Zamir D, Tanksley SD (2001) Comparison of a set of allelic QTL-NILs for chromosome 4 of tomato: deductions about natural variation and implications for germplasm ultilization. Theor Appl Genet 102: 572-590.
44. Nesbitt TN, Tanksley SD (2002) Comparative sequencing in the genus Lycopersicon: implications for the evolution of fruit size in the domestication of cultivated tomatoes. Genetics 162: 365-379.
45. Paran I, Zamir D (2003) Quantitative traits in plants: beyond the QTL. Trends Genet 19: 303-306.
46. Paterson AH, Damon S, Hewitt JD (1991) Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations and environments. Genetics 127: 181-197.
47. Ruiz JJ, García-Martínez S, Picó B, Gao M, Quiros CF (2005) Genetic variability and relationship of closely related Spanish traditional cultivars of tomato as detected by SRAP and SSR markers. J Am Soc Hort Sci 130: 88-94.
48. Saliba-Colombani V, Causse M, Gervais L, Philouze J (2000) Efficiency of RFLP, RAPD, and AFLP markers for the construction of an intraspecific map of the tomato genome. Genome 43: 29-40.
49. Saliba-Colombani V, Causse M, Langlois D (2001) Genetic analysis of organoleptic quality in fresh market tomato. 1. Mapping QTLs for physical and chemical traits. Theor Appl Genet 102: 259-272.
50. Semel Y, Nissenbaum J, Menda N, Zinder M, Krieger U, Issman N (2006) Overdominant quantitative trait loci for yield and fitness in tomato. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 12981-12986.
51. Sharma A, Zhang L, Niño-Liu D, Ashrafi H, Foolad MR (2008) A Solanum lycopersicum × Solanum pimpinellifolium linkage map of tomato displaying genomic locations of R-genes, RGAs, and candidate resistance/defense-response ESTs. Int J Plant Genome 2008: 926090.
52. Stevens MA (1986) Inheritance of tomato fruit quality components. Plant Breed Rev 4: 273-311.
53. Suliman-Pollatschek S, Kashkush K, Shats H, Hillel J, Lavi U (2002) Generation and mapping of AFLP, SSRs and SNPs in Lycopersicon esculentum. Cell Mol Biol Let 7: 583-597.
54. Swamy MBP, Sarla M (2008) Yield-enhancing quantitative trait loci (QTLs) from wild species. Biotech Adv 26: 106-120.
55. Tanksley SD (1993) Mapping polygenes. Ann Rev Genet 27: 205-233.
56. Tanksley SD, Nelson JC (1996) Advanced backcross QTL analysis, a method for the simultaneous discovery and transfer of valuable QTL from unadapted germplasm into elite breeding lines. Theor Appl Genet 92: 191-203.
57. Tanksley SD, Ganal MW, Prince JP, de Vicente MC, Bonierbale MW, Broun P, Fulton TM, Giovannoni JJ, Grandillo S, Martin GB, Messeguer R, Miller JC, Miller L, Paterson AH, Pineda O, Riider MS, Wing RA, Wu W, Young ND (1992) High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 132: 1141-1160.
58. Tanksley SD, Grandillo S, Fultom TM, Zamir D, Eshed Y, Petiard V (1996) Advanced backcross QTL analysis in a cross between an elite processing line of tomato and its wild relative L. pimpinellifolium. Theor Appl Genet 92: 213-224.
59. 7 lines. Theor Appl Genet 114: 1001-1017.
60. Villareal RL, Lai SH, Wong SH (1978) Screening for heat tolerance in the genus Lycopersicon. HortScience 13: 479-481.
61. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van De Lee T, Hornes M, Frijers A, Pot J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23: 4407-4414.
62. Yang W, Bai X, Kabelka E (2004) Discovery of singly nucleotide polymorphisms in Lycopersicon esculentum by computer aided analysis of expressed sequence tags. Mol Breed 14: 21-34.
63. Yates HE, Frary A, Doganlar S (2004) Comparative fine mapping of fruit quality QTLs on chromosome 4 introgressions derived from two wild tomato species. Euphytica 135: 283-296.
64. Zeng ZB (1994) Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 136: 1468-1475.