Advanced backcross QTL analysis in a cross between an elite processing line of tomato and its wild relative L. pimpinellifolium

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

Volumn 92, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 213-224

  Tanksley, S D ^a   Grandillo, S ^a   Fulton, T M ^a   Zamir, D ^b   Eshed, Y ^b   Petiard, V ^c   Lopez, J ^d   Beck Bunn, T ^e  

^a Cornell University ^*  (United States)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^c Francereco   (France)

^d Hispareco SA   (Spain)

^e Peto Seeds   (United States)

Author keywords

Introgression; Molecular markers; Plant breeding; Quantitative trait loci

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON PIMPINELLIFOLIUM;

EID: 0029832896     PISSN: 00405752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF00223378     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Alpert K, Grandillo S, Tanksley SD (1995) fw2.2: a major QTL controlling fruit weight is common to both red and green-fruited tomato species. Theor Appl Genet (in press)
2. Davies JN, Massey DN, Winsor GW (1958) The effect of defoliating tomato plants on fruit composition. Rpt Glasshouse Crops Res Inst 1957:53-66
3. Emery GC, Munger HM (1970) Effects of inherited differences in growth habit on fruit size and soluble solids in tomato. J Am Soc Hort Sci 95:410-412
4. Eshed Y, Zamir D (1995) An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTLs. Genetics 141:1147-1162
5. Fisher KJ (1975) Effects of the amount and position of leaf Tissue on the yield of single-truss tomatoes. Scien Hort 3:303-308
6. Goldenberg JB, von der Pahleen A (1966) Genetic and phenotypic correlation between wieght and dry matter content of tomato fruits and their heritabilities. Bol Genetico 2:1-15
7. Grandillo S, Tanksley SD(1995a) QTL analysis of horticultural traits differentiating the cultivated tomato from the closely related species Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium. Theor Appl Genet (in press)
8. Grandillo S, Tanksley SD (1995b) Genetic analysis of RFLPs, GATA microsatellites and RAPDs in a cross between L. esculentum and L. pimpinellifolium. Theor Appl Genet (in press)
9. Hewitt JD, Stevens MA (1981) Growth analysis of two tomato genotypes differing in total fruit solids content. J Am Soc Hort Sci 106:723-727
10. Ibarbia EA, Lambeth VN (1971) Tomato fruit size and quality interrelationships. J Am Soc Hort Sei 96:199-210
11. Paterson AH, Lander ES, Hewitt JD, Peterson S, Lincoln SF, Tanksley SD (1988) Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature 335:721-726
12. Paterson AH, Damon S, Hewitt JD, Zamir D, Rabinovitch HD, Lincoln SE, Lander ES, Tanksley SD (1991) Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations, and environments. Genetics 127:181-197
13. SAS Institute, Inc (1994) JMP users guide: version 3.0 of JMP. SAS Institute, Carry, N.C.
14. Stevens MA (1976) Inheritance of viscosity potential in tomato. J Am Soc Hort Sci 101:152-155
15. Stevens MA, Rudich J (1978) Genetic potential for overcoming physiological limitations on adaptability, yield, and quality in the tomato. Hort Science 13:673-678
16. Tanksley SD, Nelson JC (1995) Advanced backcross QTL analysis: a method for the simultaneous discovery and transfer of valuable QTLs from unadapted germplasm into elite breeding lines. Theor Appl Genet (in press)
17. Tanksley SD, Ganal MW, Prince JP, de Vicente MC, Bonierbale MW, Broun P, Fulton TM, Giovannoni JJ, Grandillo S, Martin GB, Messeguer R, Miller JC, Miller L, Paterson AH, Pineda O, Röder MS, Wing RA, Wu W, Young ND (1992) High-density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 132:1141-1160
18. Young ND, Tanksley SD (1989) Restriction fragment length polymorphism maps and the concept of graphical genotypes. Theor Appl Genet 77:95-101