QTL analysis of horticultural traits differentiating the cultivated tomato from the closely related species Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

Volumn 92, Issue 8, 1996, Pages 935-951

  Grandillo, S ^a   Tanksley, S D ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Domestication; Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium; Molecular markers; Plant breeding; Quantitative trait locus (QTL)

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON PIMPINELLIFOLIUM;

EID: 0029833762     PISSN: 00405752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF00224033     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Banerjee MK, Kalloo (1989) The inheritance of earliness and fruit weight in crosses between cultivated tomatoes and two wild species of Lycopersicon. Plant Breed 102 : 148-152
2. Bonierbale MW, Plaisted RL, Pineda O, Tanksley SD (1994) QTL analysis of trichome-mediated insect resistance in potato. Theor Appl Genet 87 : 973-987
3. de Vicente MC, Tanksley SD (1993) QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross. Genetics 134: 585-596
4. Doebley J, Stec A (1991) Genetic analysis of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte. Genetics 129 : 285-295
5. Doebley J, Bacigalupo A, Stec A (1994) Inheritance of kernel weight in two maize-teosinte hybrid populations: implications for crop evolution. J Hered 85 : 191-195
6. East EM (1915) Studies on size inheritance in Nicotiana. Genetics 1 : 164-176
7. Edwards MD, Stuber CW, Wendel JF (1987) Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative-trait loci in maize. I. Numbers, genomic distribution and types of gene action. Genetics 116 : 113-125
8. Emery GC, Munger HM (1970) Effect of inherited differences in growth habit on fruit size and soluble solids in tomato. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 95,410-412
9. Eshed Y, Zamir D (1995) An introgression line population of Lvcopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield associated QTLs. Genetics 141 : 1147-1162
10. Fatokun CA, Menancio-Hautea DI, Danesh D, Young ND (1992) Evidence for orthologous seed weight genes in cowpea and mung bean based on RFLP mapping. Genetics 132 : 841-846
11. Fogle HW, Currence TM (1950) Inheritance of fruit weight and earliness in a tomato cross. Genetics 35 : 363-380
12. Geldermann H (1975) Investigations on inheritance of quantitative characters in animals by gene markers. I. Methods. Theor Appl Genet 46 : 319-330
13. Goldenberg JB, von der Pahleen A (1966) Genetic and phenotypic correlation between weight and dry matter content of tomato fruits and their heritabilities. Bol Genet 2 : 1-15
14. Grandillo S, Tanksley SD (1996) Genetic analysis of RFLPs, GATA microsatellites and RAPDs in a cross between L. esculentum and L. pimpinellifolium. Theor Appl Genet 92 : 957-965
15. Hayes PM, Blake TK, Chen THH, Tragoonrung S, Chen F, Pan A, Liu B (1993) Quantitative trait loci on barley (Hordeum vulgare) chromosome 7 associated with components of winter hardiness. Genome 36 : 66-71
16. Houghtaling HB (1935) A developmental analysis of size and shape in tomato fruits. Bull Torrey Bot Club 62 : 243-252
17. Humphrey LM (1937) A cytological and morphological analysis of tomato species. Cytologia 8 : 306-318
18. Ibarbia EA, Lambeth VN (1969) Inheritance of soluble solids in a large small-fruited tomato cross. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 94 : 496-498
19. Ibarbia EA, Lambeth VN (1971) Tomato fruit size and quality interrelationships. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 96 : 199-201
20. Johanssen W (1909) Elemente der exakten Erblichkeitslehre. Fisher, Jena
21. Khalf-Allah AM, Pierce LC (1963) A comparison of selection methods for improving earliness, fruit size and yield in the tomato. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 82 : 414-419
22. Khalf-Allah AM, Pierce LC (1964) The effect of sib-mating on variation and selection of quantitative characters in the tomato. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 85 : 471-477
23. Keim P, Diers BW, Olson TC, Shoemaker RC (1990) RFLP mapping in soybean: association between marker loci and variation in quantitative traits. Genetics 126 : 735-742
24. Kemble JM, Gardner RG (1992) Inheritance of shortened fruit maturation in the cherry tomato Cornell 871213-1 and its relation to fruit size and other components of earliness. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 117 : 646-650
25. Kosambi DD (1944) The estimation of map distances from recombination values. Ann Eugen 12 : 172-175
26. Ladizinsky G (1985) Founder effect in crop-plant evolution. Econ Bot 39 : 191-199
27. Lambeth VN, Straten EF, Fields ML (1966) Fruit quality attributes of 250 foreign and domestic tomato accessions. Mo Res Bull 908
28. Lande R (1983) The response to selection on major and minor mutations affecting a metrical trait. Heredity 50 : 47-65
29. Lander ES, Botstein D (1989) Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121 : 185-199
30. Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly MJ, Lincoln SE, Newburg L (1987) MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1 : 174-181
31. Leonards-Schippers C, Gieffers W, Schäfer-Pregl R, Ritter E, Knapp SJ, Salamini F, Gebhardt C (1994) Quantitative resistance to Phytophtora infestans in potato: a case study for QTL mapping in an allogamous plant species. Genetics 137 : 67-77
32. Lincoln S, Daly M, Lander E (1992) Mapping genes controlling quantitative traits with MAPMAKER/QTL 1.1 Whitehead Institute Technical Report, 2nd edn
33. Lindhout P, Van Heusden S, Pet G, Van Ooijen JW, Sandbrink H, Verkerk R, Vrielink R. Zabel P (1994) Perspectives of molecular marker assisted breeding for earliness in tomato. Euphytica 79 : 279-286
34. Lindstrom EW (1927) The inheritance of ovate and related shapes of tomato fruits. J Agric Res 34: 961-985
35. Lindstrom EW (1935) Segregation of quantitative genes in tetraploid tomato hybrids as evidence for dominance relations of size characters. Genetics 20 : 1-11
36. Luckwill LC (1943) The genus Lycopersicon, an historical, biological, and taxonomic survey of the wild and cultivated tomatoes. Aberdeen University Studies, Scotland, No. 120
37. MacArthur JW (1928) Linkage studies with the tomato H. Three linkage groups. Genetics 13 : 410-420
38. MacArthur JW, L Butler (1938) Size inheritance and geometric growth processes in the tomato fruit. Genetics 23 : 253-268
39. Manly KF (1993) A Macintosh program for storage and analysis of experimental genetic mapping data. Mamm Genome 4 : 303-313
40. Martin B, Nienhuis J, King G, Schaefer A (1989) Restriction fragment length polymorphism associated with water use efficiency in tomato. Science 243 : 1725-1728
41. Miller JC, Tanksley SD (1990) RFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships and genetic variation in the genus Lycopersicon. Theor Appl Genet 80 : 437-448
42. Nelson CJ (1994) Molecular mapping in bread wheat. PhD thesis. Cornell University. Ithaca, N.Y.
43. Nienhuis J, Helentjaris T, Slocum M, Ruggero B, Schaefer A (1987) Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of loci associated with insect resistance in tomato. Crop Sci 27 : 797-803
44. Nilsson-Ehle H (1909) Kreuzunguntersuchungen an Hafer und Weizen. Lunds. Univ Aarskz NF 5 : 1-122
45. Paterson AH, Lander ES, Hewitt JD, Peterson S, Lincoln SE, Tanksley SD (1988) Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature 335 : 721-726
46. Paterson AH, DeVerna JW, Lanini B, Tanksley SD (1990) Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using selected overlapping recombinant chromosomes, in an interspecies cross of tomato. Genetics 124 : 735-742
47. Paterson AH, Damon S, Hewitt JD, Zamir D, Rabinovitch HD, Lincoln SE, Lander ES, Tanksley SD (1991) Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations, and environments. Genetics 127 : 181-197
48. Pierce LC, Currence TM (1959) The efficiency of selecting for earliness, yield, and fruit size in a tomato cross. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 73 : 294-304
49. Powers L (1955) Components of variance method and partitioning method of genetic analysis applied to weight per fruit of tomato hybrid and parental populations. US Dep Agric Tech Bull 1131 : 1-64
50. Powers L, Locke LF, Garret JC (1950) Partitioning method of genetic analysis applied to quantitative characters of tomato crosses. US Dep Agric Tech Bull 998 : 1-56
51. Rick CM (1958) The role of natural hybridization in the derivation of cultivated tomatoes in western South America. Econ Bot 12 : 346-367
52. Rick CM (1974) High soluble-solids content in large-fruited tomato lines derived from a wild green-fruited species. Higardia 42 : 493-510
53. Rick CM (1976) Tomato Lycopersicon esculentum (Solanaceae). In: Simmonds NW (ed) Evolution of crop plants. Longman, London, pp 268-273
54. Rick CM (1982) The Potential of exotic germplasm for tomato improvement. In: Vasil IK, Scowcroft WR, Frey KJ (eds) Plant improvement and somatic cell genetics. Academic Press, New York, pp 478-495
55. SAS Institute (1988) SAS users guide: statistics. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.
56. SAS Institute (1989) JMP users guide: Version 3.0 of JMP. SAS Institute. Cary, N.C.
57. Schön CC, Melchinger AE, Boppenmaier J, Brunklaus-Jung E, Herrmann RG, Seitzer JF (1994) RFLP mapping in maize, quantitative trait loci affecting testcross performance of elite European flint lines. Crop Sci 34 : 378-389
58. Simmonds NW (1976) Evolution of crop plants. Longman, London New York
59. Stevens MA, Rudich J (1978) Genetic potential for overcoming physiological limitations on adaptability, yield, and quality in the tomato. Hortic Sci 13 : 673-678
60. Stubbe H (1971) Weitere evolutionsgenetische Unterschungen in der Gattung Lycopersicon. Biol Zbl 90 : 545-559
61. Stuber CW, Edwards MD, Wendel JF (1987) Molecular marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative trait loci in maize. II. Factors influencing yield and its component traits. Crop Sci 27 : 639-648
62. Stuber CW, Lincoln SE, Wolff DW, Helentjaris T, Lander ES (1992) Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132 : 823-839
63. Tanksley SD (1993) Mapping polygenes. Annu Rev Genet 27 : 205-233
64. Tanksley SD, Hewitt J (1988) Use of molecular markers in breeding for soluble solids in tomato-a re-examination. Theor Appl Genet (1988) 75 : 811-823
65. Tanksley SD, Medina-Filho H, Rick CM (1982) Use of naturally-occurring enzyme variation to detect and map genes controlling quantitative traits in an interspecific backcross of tomato. Heredity 49 : 11-25
66. Tanksley SD, Ganal MW, Prince JP, de Vicente MC, Bonierbale MW, Broun P, Fulton TM, Giovannoni JJ, Grandillo S, Martin GB, Messeguer R, Miller JC, Miller L, Paterson AH, Pineda O, Röder MS, Wing RA, Wu W, Young ND (1992) High-density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 132 : 1141-1160
67. Wang G, Mackill DJ, Bonman JM, McCouch SR, Champoux MC, Nelson RJ (1994) RFLP mapping of genes conferring complete and partial resistance to blast in a durably resistant rice cultivar. Genetics 136 : 1421-1434
68. Wang ZY, Second G, Tanksley SD (1992) Polymorphism and phylogenetic relationships among species in the genus Oryzae as determined by analysis of nuclear RFLPs. Theor Appl Genet 83 : 565-581
69. Weller JI, Soller M, Brody T (1988). Linkage analysis of quantitative traits in an interspecific cross of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum x Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium) by means of genetic markers. Genetics 118 : 329-339
70. Yeager AF (1937) Studies on the inheritance and development of fruit size and shape in the tomato. J Agric Res 55 : 141-152