Comparative fine mapping of fruit quality QTLs on chromosome 4 introgressions derived from two wild tomato species

Euphytica

Volumn 135, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 283-296

  Yates, Heather E ^a   Frary, Anne ^a,c   Doganlar, Sami ^a,c   Frampton, Anna ^b   Eannetta, Nancy T ^a   Uhlig, John ^b   Tanksley, Steven D ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b Seminis Vegetable Seeds   (United States)

^c IZMIR INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

L. esculentum; L. hirsutum; L. peruvianum; Soluble solids; Wild germplasm

Indexed keywords

EMBRYOPHYTA; LYCOPERSICON; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON HIRSUTUM; LYCOPERSICON PERUVIANUM;

EID: 1342290140     PISSN: 00142336     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:EUPH.0000013314.04488.87     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bernacchi, D., T. Beck-Bunn, Y. Eshed, J. Lopez, V. Petriard, J. Uhlig, D. Zamir & S. Tanksley, 1998a. Advanced backcross QTL analysis in tomato. I. Identification of QTLs for traits of agronomic importance from L. hirsutum. Theor Appl Genet 97: 381-397.
2. Bernacchi, D., T. Beck-Bunn, D. Emmatty, Y. Eshed, S. Inai, J. Lopez, V. Petriard, H. Sayama, J. Uhlig, D. Zamir & S. Tanksley, 1998b. Advanced backcross QTL analysis in tomato. II. Evaluation of near-isogenic lines carrying single-donor introgressions for desirable QTL-alleles derived from L. hirsutum and L. pimpinellifolium. Theor Appl Genet 97: 170-180.
3. de Vincente, M.C. & S.D. Tanksley, 1993. QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross. Genetics 134: 585-596.
4. Eshed, Y. & D. Zamir, 1995. An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associate QTLs. Genetics 141: 1147-1162.
5. Foolad, M.R., L.P. Zhang, A.A. Khan, D. Nino-Liu & G.Y. Lin, 2002. Identification of QTLs for early blight, Alternaria solani resistance in tomato using backcross populations of a Lycopersicon esculentum x L. hirsutum cross. Theor Appl Genet 104: 945-958.
6. Frary, A., S. Doganlar, A. Frampton, T.M. Fulton, J. Uhlig, H.E. Yates & S.D. Tanksley, 2002. Fine Mapping of quantitative trait loci for improved fruit characteristics from Lycopersicon chmielewskii chromosome 1. Genome, in press.
7. Fulton, T.M., T. Beck-Bunn, D. Emmatty, Y. Eshed, J. Lopez, V. Petriard, J. Uhlig, D. Zamir & S.D. Tanksley, 1997a. QTL analysis of an advanced backcross of Lycopersicon peruvianum to the cultivated tomato and comparisons with QTLs found in other wild species. Theor Appl Genet 95: 881-894.
8. Fulton, T.M., J.C. Nelson & S.D. Tanksley, 1997b. Introgression and DNA marker analysis of Lycopersicon peruvianum, a wild relative of the cultivated tomato, into Lycopersicon esculentum, followed through three successive backcross generations. Theor Appl Genet 95: 895-902.
9. Fulton, T.M., S. Grandillo, T. Beck-Bunn, E. Fridman, A. Frampton, J. Lopez, V. Petriard, J. Uhlig, D. Zamir & S.D. Tanksley, 2000. Advanced backcross QTL analysis of a Lycopersicon esculentum x Lycopersicon parviflorum cross. Theor Appl Genet 100: 1025-1042.
10. Fulton, T.M., P. Bucheli, E. Voirol, V. Petriard & S.D. Tanksley, 2002. Quantitative trait loci, QTL affecting sugars, organic acids and other biochemical properties possibly contributing to flavor, identified in four advanced backcross populations of tomato. Euphytica 127: 163-177.
11. Kosambi, D.D., 1944. The estimation og map distance from recombination values. Ann Eugen 12: 172-175.
12. Lander, E.S., P. Green, J. Abrahamson, A. Barlow, M.J. Daly, S.E. Lincoln & L. Newburg, 1987. MAPAMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1: 174-181.
13. Levin, I., N. Gilboa, E. Yeselson, S. Shen, A.A. Schaffer, 2000. Fgr, a major locus that modulates the fructose to glucose ratio in mature tomato fruits. Theor Appl Genet 100: 256-262.
14. Miller, J.C. & S.D. Tanksley, 1990. RFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships and genetic variation in the genus Lycopersicon. Theor Appl Genet 80: 437-310.
15. Monforte, A.J., E. Friedman, D. Zamir & S.D. Tanksley, 2001. Comparison of a set of allelic QTL -NILs for chromosome 4 of tomato: Deductions about natural variation and implications for germplasm utilization. Theor Appl Genet 102: 572-590.
16. Tanksley, S.D., M.W. Ganal, J.P. Prince, M.C. deVicente, M.W. Bonierbale, P. Broun, T.M. Fulton, J.J. Giovannoni, S. Grandillo, G.B. Martin, R. Messeguer, J.C. Miller, A.H. Paterson, O. Pineda, M.S. Roder, R.A. Wing, W. Wu & N.D. Young, 1992. High density molecular linkage map of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 132: 1141-1160.
17. Tanksley, S.D. & J.C. Nelson, 1996. Advanced backcross QTL analysis: a method for the simultaneous discovery and transfer of valuable QTLs from unadapted germplasm into elite breeding lines. Theor Appl Genet 92: 191-203.
18. Tanksley, S.D., S. Grandillo, T.M. Fulton, D. Zamir, Y. Eshed, V. Petriard, J. Lopez & T. Beck-Bunn, 1996. Advanced Backcross QTL analysis in a cross between an elite processing line of tomato and its wild relative L. pimpinellifolium. Theor Appl Genet 92: 213-224.
19. Tanksley, S.D. & S.R. McCouch, 1997. Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277: 1063-1066.