Mapping of QTLs for lycopene and other fruit traits in a Lycopersicon esculentum x L. pimpinellifolium cross and comparison of QTLs across tomato species

Molecular Breeding

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 283-299

  Chen, F Q ^a   Foolad, M R ^a   Hyman, J ^a   St Clair, D A ^b   Beelaman, R B ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Fruit quality; L. pimpinellifolium; Lycopene; Lycopersicon esculentum; Molecular markers; Quantitative trait loci (QTLs); Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP); Soluble solids

Indexed keywords

BACKCROSSING; GENE LOCUS; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC LINKAGE; LYCOPENE; PHENOTYPE; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT GENETICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM;

CONSERVATION; MAPPING; PLANTS (BOTANY);

FRUIT QUALITY; L PIMPINELLIFOLIUM; LYCOPENES; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MOLECULAR MARKER; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISMS; SOLUBLE SOLIDS;

FRUITS;

EMBRYOPHYTA; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON PIMPINELLIFOLIUM;

EID: 0032949146     PISSN: 13803743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1009656910457     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bernacchi D, Tanksley SD: An interspecific backcross of Lycopersicon esculentwn × L. hirsutum: Linkage analysis and a QTL study of sexual compatibility factors and floral traits. Genetics 147: 861-877 (1997).
2. Chen FQ, Foolad MR: A molecular linkage map of tomato based on an interspecific cross between Lycopersicon esculentum and L. pimpinellifolium and its comparison with other molecular maps of tomato. Genome 42, (1999) in press.
3. D'Souza MC, Singha S, Ingle M: Lycopene concentration of tomato fruit can be estimated from chromaticity values. HortScience 27: 465-466 (1992).
4. deVicente MC, Tanksley SD: QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross. Genetics 134: 585-596 (1993).
5. East EM: Studies on size inheritance in Nicotiana. Genetics 1: 164-176 (1915).
6. Eshed Y, Zamir D: Introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield associated QTL. Genetics 141: 1147-1162 (1995).
7. Falconer DS: Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman Scientific and Technical, London (1989).
8. Foolad MR, Chen FQ: RFLP mapping of QTLs conferring salt tolerance during vegetative stage in tomato. Theor Appl Genet, in press.
9. Foolad MR, Chen FQ, Lin GY: RFLP mapping of QTLs conferring cold tolerance during germination in an interspecific cross of tomato. Mol Breed 4: 519-529.
10. Foolad MR, Chen FQ, Lin GY: RFLP mapping of QTLs conferring salt tolerance during germination in an interspecific cross of tomato. Theor Appl Genet 97: 1133-1144 (1998).
11. Foolad MR, Stoltz T, Dervinis C, Rodriguez RL, Jones RA: Mapping QTLs conferring salt tolerance during germination in tomato by selective genotyping. Mol Breed 3: 269-277 (1997).
12. Forster BP, Russell JR, Ellis RP, Handley LL, Robinson D, Hackett CA, Nevo E, Waugh R, Gordon DC, Keith R, Powell W: Locating genotype and genes for abiotic stress tolerance in barley: a strategy using maps, markers and the wild species. New Phytol 137: 141-147 (1997).
13. Geldermann H: Investigation on inheritance of quantitative characters in animals by gene markers. Theor Appl Genet 46: 319-330 (1975).
14. Gerster H: The potential role of lycopene for human health. J Am Coll Nutr 16: 109-126 (1997).
15. Goldman IL, Paran I, Zamir D: Quantitative trait locus analysis of a recombinant inbred line population derived from a Lycopersicon esculentum × Lycopersicon cheesmanii cross. Theor Appl Genet 90: 925-932 (1995).
16. Grandillo S, Tanksley SD: QTL analysis of horticultural traits differentiating the cultivated tomato from the closely related species Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium. Theor Appl Genet 92: 935-951 (1996).
17. Lander ES, Botstein D: Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121: 185-199 (1989).
18. Lincoln S, Daly M, Lander E: Constructing Genetic Maps with MAPMAKER/EXP 3.0. Whitehead Institute Technical Report (1992).
19. MacArthur JW, Butler L: Size inheritance and geometric growth processes in the tomato fruit. Genetics 23: 253-268 (1938).
20. MacGillivary JH, Clemente LJ: Effects of tomato size on solids content. Proc Am Soc Hort Sci 68: 466-469 (1956).
21. Martin B, Nienhuis J, King G: Restriction fragment length polymorphisms associated with water use efficiency in tomato. Science 243: 1725-1728 (1989).
22. Mather K, Jinks JL: Biometrical Genetics. Chapman and Hall, London (1971).
23. Nelson JC: QGENE: software for marker-based genomic analysis and breeding. Mol Breed 3: 239-245 (1997).
24. Paterson AH, Damon S, Hewitt JD, Zamir D, Rabinowitch HD, Lincoln SE, Lander ES, Tanksley SD: Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations, and environments. Genetics 127: 181-197 (1991).
25. Paterson AH, Lander ES, Hewitt JD, Peterson S, Lincoln SE, Tanksley SD: Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature 335: 721-726 (1988).
26. Rick CM: High soluble-solids content in large-fruited tomato lines derived from a wild green-fruited species. Hilgardia 42: 493-510 (1974).
27. Rick CM: The potential of exotic germplasm for tomato improvement. In: Vasil IK, Scowcroft WR, Freys KJ (eds) Plant Improvement and Somatic Cell Genetics, pp. 1-28. Academic Press, New York (1983).
28. Sax K: The association of size differences with seed coat pattern and pigmentation in Phaseolus vulkaris. Genetics 8: 552-560 (1923).
29. Stevens MA: Inheritance of tomato fruit quality components. Pl Breed Rev 4: 273-311 (1986).
30. Stevens MA, Rick CM: Genetics and breeding. In: Atherton JG, Rvdich J (eds) The Tomato Crop, pp. 33-109. Chapman & Hall, London, New York (1986).
31. Stuber CW, Lincoln SE, Wolff DW, Helentjaris T, Lander ES: Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132: 823-839 (1992).
32. Tanksley SD, Ganal MW, Prince JP, de-Vicente MC, Bonierbale MW, Broun P, Fulton TM, Giovannoni JJ, Grandillo S, Martin GB, Messeguer R, Miller JC, Miller L, Paterson AH, Pineda O, Roder MS, Wing RA, Wu W, Young ND: High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 132: 1141-1160 (1992).
33. Tanksley SD, Grandillo S, Fulton TM, Zamir D, Eshed Y, Petiard V, Lopez J, Beck-Bunn T: Advanced backcross QTL analysis in a cross between an elite processing line of tomato and its wild relative L. pimpinellifolium. Theor Appl Genet 92: 213-224 (1996).
34. Tanksley SD, McCouch SR: Seed banks and molecular maps: Unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277: 1063-1066 (1997).
35. Thoday JM: Location of polygenes. Nature 191: 368-37O (1961).
36. Wang G, Mackill DJ, Bonman JM, McCouch SR, Champoux MC, Nelson RJ: RFLP mapping of genes conferring complete and partial resistance to blast in a durably resistant rice cultivar. Genetics 136: 1421-1434 (1994).
37. Wright S: Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1968).