Retrospective analysis of bar-retained dentures with cantilever extension: Marginal bone level changes around dental implants over time

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 385-393

  Semper, Wiebke ^a   Heberer, Susanne ^a   Nelson, Katja ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biologic width; Cantilever length; Crestal bone loss; Dental implants; Implant retained overdenture

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; DENTURE; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; JAW; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE RETENTION; DENTURE, OVERLAY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 77953280155     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Brånemark PI, Jemt T. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5: 347-359.
2. Duyck J, Van Oosterwyck H, Vander Sloten J, De Cooman M, Puers R, Naert I. In vivo forces on oral implants supporting a mandibular overdenture: The influence of attachment system. Clin Oral Investig 1999;3: 201-207.
3. Zitzmann NU, Marinello CP. A review of clinical and technical considerations for fixed and removable implant prostheses in the edentulous mandible. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15: 65-72.
4. Brosky ME, Korioth TW, Hodges J. The anterior cantilever in the implant-supported screw-retained mandibular prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89: 244-249.
5. McAlarney ME, Stavropoulos DN. Determination of cantilever length-anterior-posterior spread ratio assuming failure criteria to be the compromise of the prosthesis retaining screw-prosthesis joint. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11: 331-339.
6. Sertgöz A, Güvener S. Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76: 165-169.
7. Nagasao T, Kobayashi M, Tsuchiya Y, Kaneko T, Nakajima T. Finite element analysis of the stresses around fixtures in various reconstructed mandibular models-Part II (effect of horizontal load). J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2003;31: 168-175.
8. Eskitascioglu G, Usumez A, Sevimay M, Soykan E, Unsal E. The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: A three-dimensional finite element study. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91: 144-150.
9. Lai H, Zhang F, Zhang B, Yang C, Xue M. Influence of percentage of osseointegration on stress distribution around dental implants. Chin J Dent Res 1998;1: 7-11.
10. Meijer HJ, Kuiper JH, Starmans FJ, Bosman F. Stress distribution around dental implants: Influence of superstructure, length of im - plants, and height of mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68: 96-102.
11. Jemt T, Lekholm U. Measurements of bone and frame-work deformations induced by misfit of implant superstructures. A pilot study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9: 272-280.
12. Clelland NL, Carr AB, Gilat A. Comparison of strains transferred to a bone simulant between as-cast and postsoldered implant frameworks for a five-implant-supported fixed prosthesis. J Prosthodont 1996;5: 193-200.
13. Karl M, Wichmann MG, Winter W, Graef F, Taylor TD, Heckmann SM. Influence of fixation mode and superstructure span upon strain development of implant fixed partial dentures. J Pros - thodont 2008;17: 3-8.
14. Tan KB. The clinical significance of distortion in implant prosthodontics: Is there such a thing as passive fit? Ann Acad Med Singapore 1995;24: 138-157.
15. Duyck J, Rønold HJ, Van Oosterwyck H, Naert I, Vander Sloten J, Ellingsen JE. The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: An animal experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12: 207-218.
16. Lindquist LW, Rockler B, Carlsson GE. Bone resorption around fixtures in edentulous patients treated with mandibular fixed tissue-integrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59: 59-63.
17. Naert I, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D, Darius P. A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part II: Prosthetic aspects. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68: 949-956.
18. Romeo E, Lops D, Margutti E, Ghisolfi M, Chiapasco M, Vogel G. Implant-supported fixed cantilever prostheses in partially edentulous arches. A seven-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14: 303-311.
19. Hälg GA, Schmid J, Hämmerle CH. Bone level changes at implants supporting crowns or fixed partial dentures with or without cantilevers. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19: 983-990.
20. Wennström J, Zurdo J, Karlsson S, Ekestubbe A, Gröndahl K, Lindhe J. Bone level change at implant-supported fixed partial dentures with and without cantilever extension after 5 years in function. J Clin Periodontol 2004;31: 1077-1083.
21. Sadowsky SJ, Caputo AA. Effect of anchorage systems and extension base contact on load transfer with mandibular implant-retained overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84: 327-334.
22. Mericske-Stern R. Force distribution on implants supporting overdentures: The effect of distal bar extension. A 3-D in vivo study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8: 142-151.
23. Zechner W, Trinkl N, Watzak G, et al. Radiologic follow-up of peri-implant bone loss around machine-surfaced and roughsurfaced interforaminal implants in the mandible functionally loaded for 3 to 7 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19: 216-221.
24. Watzak G, Zechner W, Busenlechner D, Arnhart C, Gruber R, Watzek G. Radiological and clinical follow-up of machinedand anodized-surface implants after mean functional loading for 33 months. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17: 651-657.
25. Buser D, Ingmarsson S, Dula K, Lussi A, Hirt HP, Belser UC. Longterm stability of osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: A 5-year prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22: 109-117.
26. Goméz-Román G, Axmann D, D’Hoedt B, Schulte W. Methode zur quantitativen Erfassung und statistischen Auswertung des periimplantären Knochenabbaus. Stomatologie 1995;92: 463-471.
27. Brunner E, Domhof S, Langer F. Nonparametric Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Factorial Experiments. New York: Wiley, 2002.
28. Jeffcoat MK. Digital radiology for implant treatment planning and evaluation. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1992;21: 203-207.
29. Batenburg RH, Meijer HJ, Geraets WG, van der Stelt PF. Radiographic assessment of changes in marginal bone around endosseous implants supporting mandibular overdentures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27: 221-224.
30. Zechner W, Watzak G, Gahleitner A, Busenlechner D, Tepper G, Watzek G. Rotational panoramic versus intraoral rectangular radiographs for evaluation of peri-implant bone loss in the anterior atrophic mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18: 873-878.
31. Wismeijer D, van Waas MA, Mulder J, Vermeeren JI, Kalk W. Clinical and radiological results of patients treated with three treatment modalities for overdentures on implants of the ITI dental implant system. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10: 297-306.
32. van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Naert I, Maffei G, Jacobs R. Marginal bone loss around implants retaining hinging mandibular overdentures at 4-, 8- and 12-years follow-up. J Clin Periodontol 2001;28: 628-633.
33. Schmage P, Nergiz I, Pfeiffer P, Platzer U. Digitales versus konventionelles Zahnfilmröntgen. ZWR 1997;106: 504-509.
34. Deppe H, Wagenpfeil S, Donath K. Comparative value of attachment measurements in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19: 208-215.
35. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The longterm efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1: 11-25.
36. Smith DE, Zarb GA. Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62: 567-572.
37. Chung DM, Oh TJ, Lee J, Misch CE, Wang HL. Factors affecting late implant bone loss: A retrospective analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22: 117-126.
38. Naert IE, Duyck JA, Hosny MM, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D. Freestanding and tooth-implant connected prostheses in the treatment of partially edentulous patient. Part II: An up to 15- years radiographic evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12: 245-251.
39. Attard NJ, Zarb GA. Long-term treatment outcomes in edentulous patients with implant-fixed prostheses: The Toronto study. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17: 417-424.
40. Astrand P, Engquist B, Anzén B, et al. A three-year follow-up report of a comparative study of ITI dental implants and Brånemark system implants in the treatment of the partially edentulous maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6: 130-141.
41. Jung YC, Han CH, Lee KW. A 1-year radiographic evaluation of marginal bone around dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11: 811-818.
42. Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Schoolfield JD, Cochran DL. Biologic width around one- and two-piece titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12: 559-571.
43. Pontes AE, Ribeiro FS, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, Cirelli JA, Marcantonio E Jr. Biologic width changes around loaded implants inserted in different levels in relation to crestal bone: Histometric evaluation in canine mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19: 483-490.
44. Gargiulo AW, Wentz FM, Orban B. Dimensions and relations of the dentogingival junction in humans. J Periodontol 1961;32: 261-267.
45. Broggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS, et al. Persistent acute inflammation at the implant-abutment interface. J Dent Res 2003;82: 232-237.
46. Blanes RJ, Bernard JP, Blanes ZM, Belser UC. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. I: Clinical and radiographic results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18: 699-706.
47. Boronat A, Peñarrocha M, Carrillo C, Marti E. Marginal bone loss in dental implants subjected to early loading (6 to 8 weeks postplacement) with a retrospective short-term follow-up. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66: 246-250.
48. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Roos J, Lekholm U. Identification of bone quality in conjunction with insertion of titanium implants. A pilot study in jaw autopsy specimens. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6: 213-219.
49. Carlsson GE, Lindquist LW, Jemt T. Long-term marginal periimplant bone loss in edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13: 295-302.
50. Becker CM, Kaiser DA. Implant-retained cantilever fixed prosthesis:Where and when. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84: 432-435.
51. Becker CM. Cantilever fixed prostheses utilizing dental implants: A 10-year retrospective analysis. Quintessence Int 2004;35: 437-441.
52. White SN, Caputo AA, Anderkvist T. Effect of cantilever length on stress transfer by implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71: 493-499.
53. van Waas MA, Denissen HW, de Koomen HA, et al. Dutch consensus on guidelines for superstructures on endosseous implants in the edentulous mandible. J Oral Implantol 1991;17: 390-392.
54. Haraldson T, Zarb G. A 10-year follow-up study of the masticatory system after treatment with osseointegrated implant bridges. Scand J Dent Res 1988;96: 243-252.
55. Rangert B, Jemt T, Jörneus L. Forces and moments on Brånemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4: 241-247.