Radiologic follow-up of peri-implant bone loss around machine-surfaced and rough-surfaced interforaminal implants in the mandible functionally loaded for 3 to 7 years

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 216-221

  Zechner, Werner ^a,b   Trinkl, Nina ^a,b   Watzak, Georg ^a,b   Busenlechner, Dieter ^a,b   Tepper, Gabor ^a,b   Haas, Robert ^a,b   Watzek, Georg ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b LUDWIG BOLTZMANN INSTITUTE FOR LUNG VASCULAR RESEARCH   (Austria)

Author keywords

Acid etching; Dental implants; Peri implant bone loss; Surface properties

Indexed keywords

NICOTINE;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANDIBLE; OSTEOLYSIS; PREDICTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AIR ABRASION, DENTAL; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL ARCH; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE, OVERLAY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SMOKING; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 2342439421     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Brånemark P-I. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410.
2. Albrektsson T, Zarb GA, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants. A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
3. Brånemark P-I, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977;16:1-132.
4. Albrektsson T, Dahl E, Enbom L, et al. Osseointegrated oral implants. A Swedish multicenter study of 8,139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants. J Periodontol 1988;59:287-296.
5. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:843-848.
6. Davies JE, Lowenberg B, Shiga A. The bone-titanium interface in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res 1990;24:1289-1306.
7. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902.
8. Ericsson I, Johansson CB, Bystedt H, Norton MR. A histomorphometric evaluation of bone-to-implant contact on machine-prepared and roughened titanium dental implants. A pilot study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:202-206.
9. Wennerberg A, Ektessabi A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B. A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:486-494.
10. Zechner W, Tangl S, Fürst G, et al. Osseous healing characteristics of three different implant types. A histologic and histomorphometric study in mini-pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:150-157.
11. Watzek G, Matejka M, Lill W, Mailath G, Matzka P, Plenk H Jr. Knöchern eingeheilte Implantate (Tübinger, IMZ, Brånemark) - Erfahrungen mit einem Therapiekonzept. Z Stomatol 1988;85:207-233.
12. Haas R, Mensdorff-Pouilly N, Mailath G, Watzek G. Survival of 1,920 IMZ implants followed for up to 100 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:581-588.
13. Ichikawa T, Hirota K, Kanitani H, Wigianto R, Kawamoto N, Matsumoto N. Rapid bone resorption adjacent to hydroxy-apatite-coated implants. J Oral Implantol 1996;22:232-235.
14. van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Naert I, Maffei G, Jacobs R. Marginal bone loss around implants retaining hinging mandibular overdentures, at 4-, 8- and 12-years follow-up. J Clin Periodontol 2001;28:628-633.
15. Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:1-11.
16. Cochran DL, Nummikoski PV, Higginbottom FL, Hermann JS, Makins SR, Buser D. Evaluation of an endosseous titanium implant with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface in the canine mandible: Radiographic results. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:240-252.
17. London RM, Roberts FA, Baker DA, Rohrer MD, O'Neal RB. Histologic comparison of a thermal dual-etched implant surface to machined, TPS, and HA surfaces: Bone contact in vivo in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:369-376.
18. Orsini G, Assenza B, Scarano A, Piattelli M, Piattelli A. Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:779-784.
19. Sullivan DY, Sherwood RL, Porter SS. Long-term performance of Osseotite implants: A 6-year clinical follow-up. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2001;22:326-328,330,332-334.
20. Testori T, Del Fabbro M, Feldman S, et al. A multicenter prospective evaluation of 2-months loaded Osseotite implants placed in the posterior jaws: 3-year follow-up results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:154-161.
21. Lazzara RJ, Testori T, Trisi P, Porter SS, Weinstein RL. A human histologic analysis of Osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with 2 opposing surfaces. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999;19:117-129.
22. Khang W, Feldman S, Hawley CE, Gunsolley J. A multicenter study comparing dual acid-etched and machined-surfaced implants in various bone qualities. J Periodontol 2001;72:1384-1390.
23. Jeffcoat M. Radiographic methods for the detection of progressive alveolar bone loss. J Periodontol 1992;63 (4 suppl):367-372.
24. Bragger U, Hugel-Pisoni C, Burgin W, Buser D, Lang NP. Correlations between radiographic, clinical and mobility parameters after loading of oral implants with fixed partial dentures. A 2-year longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:230-239.
25. Batenburg R, Meijer H, Geraets W, van der Stelt P. Radiographic assessment of changes in marginal bone around endosseous implants supporting mandibular overdentures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27:221-224.
26. Garg A, Vicari A. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry [review]. Implant Soc 1995;5:7-11.
27. Dula K, Mini R, van der Stelt P, Buser D. The radiographic assessment of implant patients: Decision-making criteria. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:80-89.
28. Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Nummikoski PV, Buser D, Schenk RK, Cochran DL. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants: A methodologic study comparing linear radiographic with histometric measurements. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:475-485.
29. Ogawa T, Ozawa S, Shih JH, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of osseous implants having different surface topographies in rats. J Dent Res 2000;79:1857-1863 [erratum 2001;80:396].
30. McAlarney ME, Stavropoulos DN. Determination of cantilever length-anterior-posterior spread ratio assuming failure criteria to be the compromise of the prosthesis retaining screw-prosthesis joint. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:331-339.
31. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1999.
32. Zechner W, Watzak G, Gahleitner A, Busenlechner D, Tepper G, Watzek G. Rotational panoramic versus intraoral rectangular radiographs for evaluation of peri-implant bone loss in the anterior atrophic mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;6:873-878.
33. Larsson C, Thomsen P, Aronsson BO, et al. Bone response to surface-modified titanium implants: Studies on the early tissue response to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses. Biomaterials 1996;17:605-616.
34. Trisi P, Rao W, Rebaudi A. A histometric comparison of smooth and rough titanium implants in human low-density jawbone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:689-698.
35. De Bruyn H, Collaert B, Linden U, Flygare L. A comparative study of the clinical efficacy of Screw Vent implants versus Brånemark fixtures, installed in a periodontal clinic. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:32-41.
36. Fettig RH, Kay JF. A seven-year clinical evaluation of soft-tissue effects of hydroxylapatite-coated vs. uncoated subperiosteal implants. J Oral Implantol 1994;20:42-48.
37. Roynesdal AK, Ambjornsen E, Haanaes HR. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:543-548.
38. Puchades-Roman L, Palmer RM, Palmer PJ, Howe LC, Ide M, Wilson RF. A clinical, radiographic, and microbiologic comparison of Astra Tech and Brånemark single tooth implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:78-84.
39. Jemt T, Chai J, Harnett J, et al. A 5-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:291-298.
40. Albrektsson T, Isidor F. Consensus report of Session IV. In: Lang NP, Karring T (eds). Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop on Periodontology. London: Quintessence, 1994: 317-325.
41. Ahlqvist J, Borg K, Gunne J, Nilson H, Olsson M, Astrand P. Osseointegrated implants in edentulous jaws: A 2-year longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:155-163.
42. Wismeijer D, Van Waas MA, Vermeeren JI, Mulder J, Kalk W. Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures. A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;26:263-267.
43. Carlsson GE, Lindquist LW, Jemt T. Long-term marginal periimplant bone loss in edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:295-302.
44. Eliasson A, Palmqvist S, Svenson B, Sondell K. Five-year results with fixed complete-arch mandibular prostheses supported by 4 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:505-510.
45. Mailath G, Stoiber B, Watzek G, Matejka M. Bone resorption at the entry of osseointegrated implants - A biomechanical phenomenon. Finite element study [in German]. Z Stomatol 1989;86:207-216.
46. Haas R, Haimbock W, Mailath G, Watzek G. The relationship of smoking on peri-implant tissue: A retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:592-596.
47. Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. A prospective 15-year follow-up study of mandibular fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants. Clinical results and marginal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:329-336.