Implant-retained cantilever fixed prosthesis: Where and when

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 84, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 432-435

  Becker, Curtis M ^a   Kaiser, David A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; HUMAN; MALOCCLUSION; OSTEOLYSIS; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; HUMANS; MALOCCLUSION; OSSEOINTEGRATION;

EID: 0034303173     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2000.110259     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Brånemark Pl, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Tissue-integrated prostheses osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985. p. 283-7.
2. Brånemark Pl, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Tissue-integrated prostheses osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985. p. 241-70.
3. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockier B, Brånemark P. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416.
4. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Brånemark P, JemtT. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws, Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants 1990;5:347-59.
5. Buser D, Schewk R, Steinemann S, Fiorellini J, Fox C, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902.
6. Wilke HJ, Claes L, Steinemann S. The influence of various titanium surfaces on the interface shear strength between implant and bone. Adv Biomater 1990;9:309-14.
7. Cochran DL, Simpson J, Weber H, Buser D. Attachment and growth of periodontal cells on smooth and rough titanium, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;2:289.
8. Cochran D, Nummikowski P, Higginbottom F, Herman J, Makins S, Buser D. Evaluation of an endosseous titanium implant with sandblasted and acid-etched surface in the canine mandible: radiographic results. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:240-52.
9. Klekkevold PR. Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:442-7.
10. Boyan B, Batzer R, Keiswetter K, Lui Y, Cochran D, Szmuckler-Moncler S, et al. Titanium surface roughness alter responsiveness of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to 1 alpha, 25-(OH)2D3. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;39:77-85.
11. Cochran DL, Schenk R, Lussi A, Higginbottom F, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. A histometric study on the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:1-11.
12. Buser D. The interface shear strength of titanium implant with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. A biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;45:75-83.
13. Buser D. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs. A direct comparison of sandblasted and acid-etched with machined and acid etched screw implants, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:611-9.
14. Cochran D, Herman J, Schenk R, Higginbottom F, Buser D. Biologic width around titanium implants. A histometric analysis of the implant-gingival junction around unloaded and loaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 1997;68:186-98.
15. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard J, Behneke A, Behneken N, Hint H, et al. Long-term evaluation of nonsubmerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study of 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-72.
16. Becker CM, Kaiser DA. Guidelines for splinting when implants are present. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:210-4.
17. Selby A. Fixed prosthodontic failure. Aust Dent J 1994;39:150-6.