The anterior cantilever in the implant-supported screw-retained mandibular prosthesis

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 244-249

  Brosky, M E ^a   Korioth, T W P ^b   Hodges, J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; EDENTULOUSNESS; MANDIBLE PROSTHESIS; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; RANDOMIZATION; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MANDIBLE; MECHANICAL STRESS; MIDDLE AGED; PRESSURE; ROTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTURE DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; PRESSURE; ROTATION; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0038305565     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2003.43     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416.
2. Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. 2nd ed. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985. p. 51-70.
3. Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:120-32.
4. Zarb GA, Bolender CL, Carlsson GE, Boucher CO. Boucher's prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. 11th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1997. p. 40.
5. Pietrokovski J. The bony residual ridge in man. J Prosthet Dent 1975;34: 456-62.
6. Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1998. p. 113.
7. English CE. Critical A-P spread. Implant Soc 1990;1:2-3.
8. Rangert B, Jemt T, Jorneus L. Forces and moments on Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:241-7.
9. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:843-8.
10. McAlarney ME, Stavropoulos DN. Determination of cantilever length-anterior-posterior spread ratio assuming failure criteria to be the compromise of the prosthesis retaining screw-prosthesis joint. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:331-9.
11. Chapman RJ. Principles of occlusion for implant prostheses: guidelines for position, timing, and force of occlusal contacts. Quintessence Int 1989;20:473-80.
12. Shackleton JL, Carr L, Slabbert JC, Becker PJ. Survival of fixed implant-supported prostheses related to cantilever lengths. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:23-6.
13. Beumer J, Lewis SG. The Branemark implant system: clinical and laboratory procedures. St. Louis: Medico Dental Media; 1989. p. 73.
14. Hobo S, Ichida E. Osseointegration and occlusal rehabilitation. Chicago: Quintessence; 1989. p. 179.
15. Zarb G, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointe-grated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:185-94.
16. Hansen CA, DeBoer J, Woolsey GD. Esthetic and biomechanical considerations in reconstructions using dental implants. Dent Clin North Am 1992;36:713-41.
17. Naert I, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D, Darius P. A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part II: prosthetic aspects. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:949-56.
18. Lindquist LW, Rockler B, Carlsson GE. Bone resorption around fixtures in edentulous patients treated with mandibular fixed tissue-integrated pros-theses. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:59-63.
19. White SN, Caputo AA, Anderkvist T. Effect of cantilever length on stress transfer by implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:493-9.
20. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Branemark PI, Jemt T. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally eden-tulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:347-59.
21. Jemt T, Carlsson L, Boss A, Jorneus L. In vivo load measurements on osseointegrated implants supporting fixed or removable prostheses: a comparative pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:413-7.
22. Zarb G, Schmitt A. Osseointegration and the edentulous predicament: the 10-year-old Toronto study. Br Dent J 1991;170:439-44.
23. Kallus T, Bessing C. Loose gold screws frequently occur in full-arch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants after 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:169-78.
24. Walton JN, MacEntee MI. Problems with prostheses on implants: a retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:283-8.
25. Patterson EA, Johns RB. Theoretical analysis of the fatigue life of fixture screws in osseointegrated dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:26-33.
26. McGlumphy EA, Mendel DA, Holloway JA. Implant screw mechanics. Dent Clin North Am 1998;42:71-89.
27. Hobkirk JA, Schwab J. Mandibular deformation in subjects with osseointe-grated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:319-28.
28. Meijer HJ, Kuiper JH, Starmans FJ, Bosman F. Stress distribution around dental implants: influence of superstructure, length of implants, and height of mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:96-102.
29. Korioth TW, Hannam AG. Deformation of the human mandible during simulated tooth clenching. J Dent Res 1994;73:56-66.
30. Hobkirk JA, Havthoulas TK. The influence of mandibular deformation, implant numbers, and loading position on detected forces in abutments supporting fixed implant superstructures. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:169-74.
31. DiPietro GJ, Moergeli JR. Significance of the Frankfort-mandibular plane angle to prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1976;36:624-35.
32. Mercier P, Lafontant R. Residual alveolar ridge atrophy: classification and influence of facial morphology. J Prosthet Dent 1979;41:90-100.
33. Unger JW, Ellinger CW, Gunsolley JC. An analysis of the relationship between mandibular alveolar bone loss and a low Frankfort-mandibular plane angle. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:513-6.
34. Ericsson I, Glantz PO, Branemark PI. Use of implants in restorative therapy in patients with reduced periodontal tissue support. Quintessence Int 1988;19:801-7.
35. Cohen SR, Orenstein JH. The use of attachments in combination implant and natural-tooth fixed partial dentures: a technical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:230-4.
36. Osier JF. Biomechanical load analysis of cantilevered implant systems. J Oral Implantol 1991;17:40-7.
37. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Branemark system. Clin Oral Implant Res 1992;3:104-11.
38. Carr AB, Stewart RB. Full-arch implant framework casting accuracy: preliminary in vitro observations for in vivo testing. J Prosthodont 1993;2:2-8.
39. Worthington P, Bolender CL, Taylor TD. The Swedish system of osseointe-grated implants: problems and complications encountered during a 4-year trial period. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:77-84.
40. Korioth TW, Johann AR. Influence of mandibular superstructure shape on implant stresses during simulated posterior biting. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:67-72.
41. FaroArm Technologies Inc Manual; 1999.
42. FaroArm Technologies Inc. The FaroArm product page. Available at: http://faroarm.com. Accessed March 20, 2002.
43. Taylor TD. Prosthodontic problems and limitations associated with osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:74-8.
44. Tulley WJ. Methods of recording patterns of behavior of the oro-facial muscles using the electromyograph. Trans Brit Soc Study Orthodont 1953;96:88-95.