Finite element analysis of the stresses around fixtures in various reconstructed mandibular models - Part II (effect of horizontal load)

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 168-175

  Nagasao, T ^a   Kobayashi, M ^a   Tsuchiya, Y ^a   Kaneko, T ^a   Nakajima, T ^a  

^a KEIO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBEDDING; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FORCE; FRACTURE FIXATION; GRAFT FAILURE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MANDIBLE FRACTURE; MANDIBLE PROSTHESIS; MANDIBLE RECONSTRUCTION; PREMOLAR TOOTH; STATISTICAL MODEL; STRESS FRACTURE; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

EID: 0038158252     PISSN: 10105182     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1010-5182(03)00029-5     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Eliasson A, Palmqvist S, Svenson B, Sondell K: Five-year results with fixed complete-arch mandibular prostheses supported by 4 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15: 505-510, 2000
2. Flemming AFS, Evans BND, Brough MD: Mandibular reconstruction using vascularized fibula. Br J Plast Surg 43: 403-409, 1990
3. Hanai J: Dynamic analysis of osseointegrated implants on edentulous mandible by three dimensional finite element method: effect of fixture number and length on the stress distribution around the implants. Shikwa Gakuho 98: 933-954, 1998
4. Hidalgo DA: Fibula free flap; a new method of mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 84: 71-79, 1989
5. Kopp CD: Overdentures and osseointegration; case studies and treatment planning. Dent Clin North Am 34: 729-739, 1990
6. Menicucci G, Lorenzetti M, Pera P, Preti G: Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: finite element analysis of two anchorage systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13: 369-376, 1998
7. Nakajima K, Kondo J, Fujiwara M: An experimental study on the dynamic traits in dehydrated mandible - Regarding the Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio of compact bone. Shikwa Gakuho 84: 1951-1961, 1984
8. Nagasao T, Kobayashi M, Tsuchiya Y, Kaneko T, Nakajima T: Finite element analysis of the stresses around fixtures in various reconstructed mandibular models. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 30: 170-177, 2002
9. O'Mahony A, Bowles Q, Woolsey G, Robinson SJ, Spencer P: Stress distribution in the single-unit osseointegrated dental implant: finite element analysis of axial and off-axial loading. Implant Dent 9: 207-217, 2000
10. O'Mahony A, Williams J, Spencer P: Anisotropic elasticity of cortical and cancellous bone in the posterior mandible increases peri-implant stress and strain under oblique loading. Clin Oral Implant Res 12: 648-656, 2001
11. Schusterman MA, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Harris S: The osteocutaneous free fibular flap: is the skin paddle reliable? Plast Reconst Surg 90: 787-793, 1992
12. Sertgoz A, Guvener S: Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis. J Prosth Dent 76: 165-169, 1996
13. Stegaroiu R, Sato T, Kusakari H, Miyakawa O: Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13: 82-90, 1998
14. Tamatsu Y: A measurement of local elastic modulus of labial and buccal compact bone of human mandible. Jpn J Oral Biol 36: 306-329, 1994
15. van Zyl PP, Grundling NL, Jooste CH, Terblanche E: Three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible incorporating six osseointegrated implants for stress analysis of mandibular cantilever prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 10: 51-57, 1995
16. Wei FC, Chen HC, Chuang CC, Brough MD: Fibular osteoseptocutaneous flap: anatomic study and clinical application. Plast Reconst Surg 78: 191-199, 1986