Influence of fixation mode and superstructure span upon strain development of implant fixed partial dentures

Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 3-8

  Karl, Matthias ^a   Wichmann, Manfred G ^a   Winter, Werner ^a   Graef, Friedrich ^a   Taylor, Thomas D ^b   Heckmann, Siegfried M ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^c School of Dental Medicine   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bridge span; Cement retention; Passive fit; Screw retention; Strain development; Superstructure accuracy

Indexed keywords

TOOTH CEMENT;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

CEMENTATION; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE RETENTION; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS FITTING;

EID: 38049060005     PISSN: 1059941X     EISSN: 1532849X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00236.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Assif D, Marshak B, Schmidt A : Accuracy of implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996 11 : 216 222
2. Pietrabissa R, Gionso L, Quaglini V, et al : An in vitro study on compensation of mismatch of screw versus cement-retained implant supported fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000 11 : 448 457
3. Jemt T, Carlsson L, Boss A, et al : In vivo load measurements on osseointegrated implants supporting fixed or removable prostheses: a comparative pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991 6 : 413 417
4. Smedberg JI, Nilner K, Rangert B, et al : On the influence of superstructure connection on implant preload: a methodological and clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996 7 : 55 63
5. Clelland NL, Papazoglou E, Carr AB, et al : Comparison of strains transferred to a bone simulant among implant overdenture bars with various levels of misfit. J Prosthodont 1995 4 : 243 250
6. Clelland NL, Carr AB, Gilat A : Comparison of strains transferred to a bone simulant between as-cast and postsoldered implant frameworks for a five-implant- supported fixed prosthesis. J Prosthodont 1996 5 : 193 200
7. Watanabe F, Uno I, Hata Y, et al : Analysis of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000 15 : 209 218
8. Carr AB : Comparison of impression techniques for a five-implant mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991 6 : 448 455
9. Carr AB : Comparison of impression techniques for a two-implant 15-degree divergent model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992 7 : 468 475
10. Vigolo P, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G : In vitro comparison of master cast accuracy for single-tooth implant replacement. J Prosthet Dent 2000 83 : 562 566
11. Herbst D, Nel JC, Driessen CH, et al : Evaluation of impression accuracy for osseointegrated implant supported superstructures. J Prosthet Dent 2000 83 : 555 561
12. Ma T, Nicholls JI, Rubenstein JE : Tolerance measurements of various implant components. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997 12 : 371 375
13. Tan KB : The clinical significance of distortion in implant prosthodontics: is there such a thing as passive fit? Ann Acad Med Singapore 1995 24 : 138 157
14. Keith SE, Miller BH, Woody RD, et al : Marginal discrepancy of screw-retained and cemented metal-ceramic crowns on implants abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999 14 : 369 378
15. Cheshire PD, Hobkirk JA : An in vivo quantitative analysis of the fit of Nobel Biocare implant superstructures. J Oral Rehabil 1996 23 : 782 789
16. Carr AB, Brunski JB, Hurley E : Effects of fabrication, finishing, and polishing procedures on preload in prostheses using conventional "gold" and plastic cylinders. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996 11 : 589 598
17. Misch CE : Screw-retained versus cement-retained implant-supported prostheses. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995 7 : 15 18
18. Hebel KS, Gajjar RC : Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997 77 : 28 35
19. Chee W, Felton DA, Johnson PF, et al : Cemented versus screw-retained implant prostheses: which is better? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999 14 : 137 141
20. Guichet DL, Caputo AA, Choi H, et al : Passivity of fit and marginal opening in screw- or cement-retained implant fixed partial denture designs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000 15 : 239 246
21. Heckmann SM, Karl M, Wichmann MG, et al : Cement fixation and screw retention: parameters of passive fit. An in vitro study of three-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004 15 : 466 473
22. Karl M, Winter W, Taylor TD, et al : In vitro study on passive fit in implant-supported 5-unit fixed partial dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004 19 : 30 37
23. Keaveny TM, Guo XE, Wachtel EF, et al : Trabecular bone exhibits fully linear elastic behavior and yields at low strains. J Biomech 1994 27 : 1127 1136
24. Haack JE, Sakaguchi RL, Sun T, et al : Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995 10 : 529 536